Karamo addresses fraud and prop 2
This is a sharp lady. And frankly Benson is by her actions, ..a criminal.
I wish I would have started the video sooner. Kristina will do a fine job.
Share as you can, there isn’t too much time left in this election cycle.
(8)Nuh Uh.
(1)Michigan statewide results are unworthy of certification, period.
Michigan’s top election official has soiled the bed.
Not unexpected, but very real and is as evident as the mess dripping off 6tally sheets in Detroit since counting started Tuesday evening. Giving Jocelyn Benson the benefit of the doubt, I guess we could call the entire affair ..gross incompetence. You can decide if it is enough to explain illegal mailings, purposefully overwhelming clerks with procedure changes, and dropping late notice and unnecessary and illegal rules about firearms in election places.
Her office is apparently unavailable at the most critical times during the count, and when fraud is literally happening before folks eyes, there is no adherence to state law. To call this ‘planned malfeasance’ would be a compliment, as the evidence piles up making the case for felony election manipulation seemingly only possible in 2020.
In 2016 there weren’t agents in Michigan’s top offices. In 2016 they didn’t see Donald Trump even having even the slightest chance of winning the ‘blue state’ of Michigan. It’s 2020, and three criminals run the prison, and they saw him coming this time.
Antrim County offers a glimpse at what might happen when we have problems with electronic equipment and such, but Detroit is as Detroit as it has ever been, and with it’s large population, it offers great cover for the largest election fraud operation ever perpetrated on the voters in Michigan. this state has seen it for decades, and that is why there are laws that protect the sanctity of the vote, and why there are procedures to allow challenges to illegal ballots and over counting.
This time it was overwhelming, and those laws are being ignored. Ballots appearing after cut off times, ballots being re-run, ballots with no names being run? Challengers are being kept away from inspecting after calling out these problems, and a majority of this action happening in one particular place.
Any judge looking to answer the Trump campaign’s concerns on this will have to have options however.
(15)Nuh Uh.(1)Antrim County may have exposed a significant issue with voting during the 2020 Presidential election.
If it was not for a history of STRONG conservative voting in a Northern Michigan County, we might not have been aware of yet ONE more way in which Michigan’s vote is being manipulated.
This mornings discovery of a Biden win in Antrim County was by any estimation an amazing thing. Literally ‘flipping’ the 70% GOP stronghold on its head, the vote gave the former president an unrealistic win over the popular President. The county clerk somehow missed the obvious* after the tallies were made and the data reported up to the state. From the Free Press:
Antrim County Clerk Sheryl Guy, a Republican who ran unopposed and won a third four-year term Tuesday in the strongly GOP county, said results on electronic tapes and a computer card were accurate but it appeared that some of the results were somehow scrambled after the cards were transported in sealed bags from township precincts to county offices and downloaded onto a computer.
In 2016, Trump won Antrim County with about 62% of the vote, compared to about 33% for Democrat Hillary Clinton. Trump beat Clinton by about 4,000 votes.
Last nights reported total had Biden beating Trump 7769 – 4409.
And to add a little perspective on this, I would wager that at least 4500 Antrim County folks were present for the Trump Rally Monday. In fact the county is SO PRO TRUMP, they sent logging trucks to assist in the rally prep, providing additional walls for the event and protection of our President.
Anyone familiar with this part of the state would immediately recognize the numbers as being suspect. It certainly calls for a complete and intensive investigation, and reminds us that election integrity in Michigan is not guaranteed. Officials might claim that the system worked and we caught it this time, but somehow this rings a little untrue. What would have happened I wonder – if the predisposition of the county to the GOP was less known?
(11)Nuh Uh.(1)It is especially sad that the writer of a recent editorial may actually think this way ..for real.
I often marvel at how a political perspective can be so exposed in a single editorial.
The left would upend all manner of things traditional Americans and Michiganians stand for. Rule-of-law, constitutional authority, and what constitutes voting access. Today, the Traverse City Record Eagle editorial bemoaned the decision by the Michigan Appeals Court to uphold our state statute regarding absentee ballots:
“There’s nothing more frustrating than a last-minute rules change.
But that’s exactly what voters face after a three-judge panel at the Michigan Court of Appeals decided to overturn a lower court’s decision about how and when absentee votes should be counted.”
Actually, the rules have been in place for 66 years. One would think THAT is enough time to get your affairs in order to vote. The rules are the rules, and Act 116 of 1954, MCL 168.764a provides the rules for absentee voting, and specifically in Step 6: “The ballot must reach the clerk or an authorized assistant of the clerk before the close of the polls on election day. An absent voter ballot received by the clerk or assistant of the clerk after the close of the polls on election day will not be counted. “
So there is that. (it continues ..)
(16)Nuh Uh.(0)Recently, I was accused of gutter politics by Michigan state board of education candidate Sonjalita Hulbert for pointing out her history of supporting Black Lives Matter.
Hulbert posted a video response to my blog in which she suggested it is beyond the pale to hold a political candidate accountable to their on-the-record statements regarding pressing issues.
(15)Nuh Uh.(0)A reasonable absentee system already showing signs of stress.
We are told that opposing mail-in voting is “suppressing the vote.”
We are told this by the progressive left which has designs on permanent minority rule, ala socialism. Clearly, opposition to fraud is straight up patriotic IMO, and one has only to look at those who promote such dangerous (to our Republic) activity to know what the right position is on this.
Mail-in voting, while related to absentee voting, is not quite the same. Absentee voting has historically had a fairly reliable record. Even with the substantial damage done to it by Michigan’s proposal 3 in 2018, it was – and has been considered ‘safe and trustworthy.’
Even so, there are issues that apparently need to be managed better, and may give pause to expanding such issues legislatively. The August primary in Michigan has already revealed that even with Absentee voting.
There appears to be evidence of attempted fraud. Today’s Epoch times reports:
(11)Nuh Uh.(0)We are here to help
A group called United Impact Group, LLC is asking clerks across Michigan for copies of voted ballots and other material from the November 2016 election, using the Freedom of Information Act. Michigan’s news media cannot seem to figure out who they are and are posting ominous articles.
We are here to help.
United Impact Group LLC is a Delaware Corporation. Their Delaware Division of Corporations file number is 6981572. It was incorporated on 19 July 2018.
Costs $ 20 to know more.
We’ll let the idiots in the media spend that $ 20. The price of an education.
(17)Nuh Uh.(0)Plausible deniability of the year tale comes with "machines bumping up against each other"
I probably could have commented on this several times since the recount nonsense.
The unintended consequences of the Jill Stein recount, was to officially put the Michigan Secretary of State on notice that there are irregularities with the voting in the motor city. Of course the unspoken truth has always been known, but proof of such shenanigans was elusive and considered inconsequential for most elections.
Given the revelation of fraud, and the incredible magnitude which it has appeared, it would seem only proper to fully investigate all of those who are entrusted with our voting responsibility in these precincts. Criminal sanctions are likely warranted in some cases revealed by Stein’s efforts, yet the players caught with their hands in the cookie jar are not going to admit culpability too easily. From the New American
(12)Nuh Uh.(0)We are becoming a nation of the lawless.
Sometimes law enforcement or appropriate legal action arrives too late.
This morning, I learned about an election law violator. A call from a contact in Lansing gave me the heads up on a high profile lawbreaker in Traverse City. Apparently, Michael Moore thought it would be good to let people not just know how he voted, but to broadcast the image of his ballot explicitly:
Just voted!! Woohoo!! HILLARY, dammit! A vote for kindness and compassion and AGAINST misogyny, racism & greed. #USA pic.twitter.com/xclQliSmS3
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) November 5, 2016
Gosh, haven’t we been warned incessantly by the media constantly about how showing pictures of our ballots is illegal?
Certainly in Michigan it is.
(12)Nuh Uh.(0)Natural disasters, or 'states of emergency' CAN happen in our Great Lakes State.
Michigan is not immune to the effects of nature, and the SoS may have once again missed an opportunity to protect the electorate.
“Once again,” I say because when it mattered, Ruth Johnson sided with the governor in his lawbreaking. In the Proposal 1 (loser by 80%-20% statewide) leadup, the governor broke the law in front of Johnson, Schuette, and nearly every single lawmaker and judge in the state.
Nothing was done, and in-fact there was an effort to circumvent the process that had been defended only years before. Even the Michigan GOP’s pet poodle Greg McNeilly noted the infraction saying “.. it was “inappropriate” for Snyder to use the televised speech to advocate for a “yes” vote on Proposal 1.” yet stopped short of calling a misdemeanor what it is. Flame Hard indeed.
But this recent failure by the SoS is a little more local, yet profound. When a natural disaster prevents voters from reaching the polls, ought not the top elections official be a little more proactive? In the case of an Elmwood township millage question, Johnson’s office went from a failure to uphold the law to negligence and simple abject failure.
(9)Nuh Uh.(0)
