You know that you’ve been played, right?
And what are you going to do about it?
{More below the fold.}
You know that you’ve been played, right?
And what are you going to do about it?
{More below the fold.}
Remember what our President said? Well, now we have 817,185 unemployed or, 16.5% in Michigan, and in total 17,000,000 nationally. Like it or not, the cure cannot be more threatening to lives than a questionable bug from China. Besides, exactly who are these so-called ‘experts’ we’re listening to? Rahm Emanuel’s Obamacare architect brother with ties to the very biased China-centric WHO?
Indeed, Mr. Delingpole. There are now so many questions that arise with our ‘experts’ and what is now appearing like another coordinated effort to remove President Trump from Office by crashing our booming Trump Economy. If this does not strike you as something afoul is going on then perhaps, you need to review This, and This.
Soon after Easter, methinks, we will be as a nation returning to normal as the false facade keeps on slipping in view of the public’s eye. And, if Gov. Gretchen “Half” Whitmer decides to go beyond federal guidelines, so be it, the destruction of Michigan’s economy will be on her – she will own it – not President Trump.
If the governor cannot abide by the law, why should anyone else?
I am not advocating for lawlessness.
But the basis under which Whitmer has crafted EO 2020-33 is not entirely within the scope of the law. PA390, the act under which certain transgressions of our daily liberties might be enacted, does have rules that the governor must follow.
Specifically, it must describe the manner under which we can be assured that the ‘disaster’ has been resolved. the order must describe the conditions under which, if met become the basis for rescinding such an order.
As you see in the actual order 2020-33, it cites PA390 and in particular the section which grants her authority to make an EO. It does not however, describe what constitutes an end to the ‘disaster’ as required by section 3.
So, is this order even legitimate?
And going beyond even this particular evidence that this governor is both power hungry and in over her head, are her edicts about movement and congregation even lawful?