It’s pretty damn bad when other legalese jihadi openly go after one of their own in their *profession*.
Judge William Whitbeck, formerly of Mich Court of Appeals: @SchuetteOnDuty must defend entire Mich. Constitution http://t.co/hkCO8WgbRy
— Detroit News Opinion (@DetNewsOpinion) February 17, 2015
Where does every politician exploit their sworn Oath? “according to the best of his ability.”
Expediency and a decent line of Bee-esS will carry some places, however, AG Schuette can forget about a run for anything beyond local dog catcher in 2018.
Ps. sorry kid, but you’re still out in a wonk’s Left field. Obviously, age hasn’t helped the lad much.
You Betcha! 
(22)Nuh Uh.
(0)
(22)Nuh Uh.(0)
Whitbeck is spot on.
I believe you misread the article, probably thanks to the open-ended title. Judge Whitbeck was writing in SUPPORT of AG Schuette. I refer to this paragraph:
These judges and justices are not closed-minded traditionalists. They see themselves, rightly, as supporting and defending the law that the people have made and the democratic process itself. Attorney General Bill Schuette is in good company as he discharges the oath that he twice so solemnly swore in front of the Capitol on those cold winter days.
No, Mr. Filler, there is no *misreading* on RightMi.com.
Your boss, in his elected position, chose not to defend Article I § 25, which 'we the People' decided on November 2, 2004.
In other words, are you stating that activist Judge Bernard Friedman's legalese word, which started it all, trumps 'we the People'?