Assuming Proposal 2 were to pass?
What prevents a person from declaring a political affiliation that is not truly what they are? Are there mind readers employed by law enforcement agencies who can sort it out?
Enjoy and share this video with all of those whom you think might be stupid enough to think Prop 2 is a good idea. Maybe share with those who might also find it entertaining.
Ciao
You Betcha! 
(17)Nuh Uh.
(0)
(17)Nuh Uh.(0)
Why should you vote no on Proposal two, the new gerrymandering scheme>
This had been anticipated by those behind VNP (read: democrats). They have even, albeit indirectly, acknowledged this fact when the state Board of Canvassers signed off on this stink-burger back in August.
"Getting “of citizens” added to the ballot header was a “minor win” for the ballot committee, said Votes Not Politicians founder and Executive Director Katie Fahey. “Unfortunately there was still major aspects of how we intentionally crafted the language — the purpose of crafting it — that were left out.”
This is Prop 2's Achilles Heel that democrats knew that they couldn't redress when the political leaning of these "independent" board members were eventually exposed.
There will be no "do-overs".
There will be no expulsions. Why else do you think that they made it mathematically impossible to remove one of their own via their own carefully crafted ballot language?.
And most importantly, there are NO PENALTIES when they are caught. You won't see any "independent" democrats from this "non-partisan" citizens commissioners looking at fines and/or spending some quality time behind bars for their deception.
The democrats will just smile, shrug and say something akin to "Oh, well"' while they are busy turning Michigan into Illinois or Venezuela..