Beware the unintended consequence of shallow thinking.
Sometimes, folks want to have an impact in their communities.
They might oppose a millage, pass out literature and information about proposed spending by their local governments. Some might simply try to engage their neighbors in a campaign process through simple means. They might try to encourage certain priorities as well, and may do so by only spending a few bucks at the local copy mart.
All of this free speech is protected, right? In fact, such expression is legally permissible without a legal regimen, allowing up to $1000 to be spent currently. Candidates for public office, as well as ballot advocacy groups can opt out of reporting requirements if they do not reach that $1000 spending threshold.
However, as long as there are men occupying government, this too can change.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7b7/8a7b7d42d232e61b53bb297c4e8899d3a5d11fbb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8af49/8af49be32f5f48bb448d42e85fc22f59426eac8f" alt=""