An unnecessary urinating contest risks two primary frontrunners canceling each other out.
It’s a given to the point of predictability, in contested republican primaries, that eventually someone will defensively mis-invoke Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment. Naturally, this will require someone to explain that the intent of “thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow republican” is a prohibition against personal attacks, but that calling someone out on an accurate understanding of their actual record is always fair game. That said, I can honestly say that I never expected to have to explain one of the Ten Commandments in the context of a political campaign, nor that I would have to do so as a remonstration to a political attack that is not only blatantly personal, but also patently false (to the point of being willingly, deliberately, and knowingly deceptive).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0d60/a0d60e7e0f9b20dbc9968bd85745ee56f91a1bf8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7b7/8a7b7d42d232e61b53bb297c4e8899d3a5d11fbb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8af49/8af49be32f5f48bb448d42e85fc22f59426eac8f" alt=""