According to outgoing president Mary Sue at Moscow on the Huron, this LRAD crap is a frilliant idea.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7b7/8a7b7d42d232e61b53bb297c4e8899d3a5d11fbb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8af49/8af49be32f5f48bb448d42e85fc22f59426eac8f" alt=""
According to outgoing president Mary Sue at Moscow on the Huron, this LRAD crap is a frilliant idea.
One of the stupid things we do when applying the law, is to attempt to read minds.
Motivation is certainly a part of the considerations when determining guilt in circumstantial considerations, but applying a specific penalty to those motives? Nolan Finley gets it right this time:
“It just doesn’t matter. No one should ever be charged with a hate crime.
For one thing, layering on the hate crime charge creates unequal classes of victims.
If you get murdered by a junkie who wants your wallet, or a jealous husband, or a maniac on a killing spree, you’re just as dead as someone who gets offed by a racist.”
And frankly if the punishment ought to be increased under the suspicion that the perpetrator(s) were doing a ‘hate crime’, then it ought to apply always.