NAVIGATION
|
Your New Scoop SiteWelcome to Scoop! To help you figure things out, there is a Scoop Admin Guide which can hopefully answer most of your questions. Some tips:
For support, questions, and general help with Scoop, email support@scoophost.com ScoopHost.com is currently running Scoop version Undeterminable from . |
Tag: Liberties (page 3)By Corinthian Scales, Section News
Remember that. By Corinthian Scales, Section News
via NYP
Wait like Sheeple for the same folk that have potential for ushering folks into the boxcars? Note what the LEOs are carrying in the video, and that DHS just ordered 7,000 more "Personal Defense Weapons". Wait for them with nothing in my hand? Nah. No thanks. Good for thee, good for me. (1 comment) Comments >> By jgillmanjr, Section News
Note: This is a piece I'm working on trying to get published in the Lansing State Journal. As such, I'm limiting it to 500 words to try and check that block for publishing, otherwise I would much rather give further elaboration - which I probably will later on.
Given recent events, it's not surprising that gun control is once again a hot topic in the media. One side claims that more people should be armed, with a synergistic call for banishing of no-carry zones. The other side claims that "assault weapons" need to be abolished, along with the cry for more background checks in tandem. Of course, let's not forget something that everyone can agree on - keeping firearms out of the hands of felons! Right? Now that you've read the opening paragraph, I'll let you in on a little secret - the topic that really requires examination is that of liberty in a more generalized context. The idea of prohibiting select demographics from certain activities is apropos to more than the firearms debate. After all, we can also agree that sex offenders shouldn't be allowed to live within a certain distance of schools, can't we? Actually, I would highly disagree. I'll be blunt: If we can't trust an individual to partake in all of their liberties, while not affecting those of others, they should be trusted with none, and locked up. If we take the stance that those released from confinement after serving their prison sentence should be restricted in their liberties, where do we draw the line? Rather, where do we draw the virtually infinite number of lines? Should we require background checks prior to allowing access to the Internet? "Preposterous!" you might shout at the screen, spilling coffee all over your keyboard and localized copy of literature du jour. Is it, though? After all, nowadays it really isn't hard to fire up a slew of virtualized servers and perform a distributed denial of service attack against someone. Such an attack could be used, for example, to destroy someone's online business. If we could even save one business, wouldn't Internet regulation be worth it? Where have I heard that before.. Let's apply the same theory to securities. Shouldn't we ensure that those participating in the various markets aren't dangerous? After all, we can't have the small time investor left holding the bag by those who might paint the tape! It can be assumed that some formerly incarcerated individuals (felons or otherwise) won't recidivate; Otherwise, why release them? Who are we to tell them that they should be prohibited from future participation in the stock market, or from running an online company, due to their past transgressions? With their release, we obviously trust them with any number of other liberties, virtually any of which, including free speech, can abet malicious activity. Attempted regulation of specific liberties is logically flawed. After all, how could one objectively determine the appropriate level of regulation, if any, for a particular liberty (outside of determining whether it directly infringes on another's liberties)? You can't. It's an instantly lost battle. If we can trust someone with only a certain set of liberties, should we trust them with any? I say absolutely not. (3 comments) Comments >> By Corinthian Scales, Section News
By Corinthian Scales, Section Multimedia
RNC, GOP, MI-GOP, take note at the three minute mark. Moderate/Centrist republicans only provide a two wing - same bird pathway of victory for the Democratic Party. Why vote Democrat-lite when you can vote for the real thing? SB59 veto = One Term Nerd. H/t Knuckledraggin (8 comments) Comments >> By Corinthian Scales, Section News
The point of this is not about Piers, his bogus "11,000 to 35" stat he speechifies - it's about agenda. In nations that have initiated a weapons ban as Law, the number of deaths is always >0. The agenda of The Left is always about: Control. The Second Amendment is viewed by the The Left as their greatest obstacle standing between them and control no different than it was 237 years ago for King George III. Recall what was said about health care... it takes a long time to do the necessary administrative steps that have to be taken, to put the legislation together to control the people. Those incremental words chosen by the longest serving Democrat in DC, was not in error. Nor is the enslaving incremental agenda. (16 comments) Comments >> By Corinthian Scales, Section News
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. (1 comment) Comments >> By Corinthian Scales, Section News
Today it's Iraqis under Federal investigation.
via The Detroit News
Gov. Rick Snyder appointed Ron Boji of Orchard Lake and Craig DeNooyer of Kalamazoo to the Michigan Strategic Fund board of directors Monday.
One Term Nerd OK, I'll ask again... Senate nancy boys, what are you going to do here?
|
External FeedsMetro/State News RSS from The Detroit News+ Craig: Cushingberry tried twice to elude police, was given preferential treatment + Detroit police arrest man suspected of burning women with blowtorch + Fouts rips video as 'scurrilous,' defends Chicago trip with secretary + Wind, winter weather hammer state from Mackinac Bridge to southeast Mich. + Detroit Cass Tech QB Campbell expected to be released from custody Friday + New water rates range from -16% to +14%; see change by community + Detroit's bankruptcy gets controversial turn in new Honda ad + Royal Oak Twp., Highland Park in financial emergency, review panels find + Grosse Ile Twp. leads list of Michigan's 10 safest cities + Wayne Co. sex crimes backlog grows after funding feud idles Internet Crime Unit + Judge upholds 41-60 year sentence of man guilty in Detroit firefighter's death + Detroit man robbed, shot in alley on west side + Fire at Detroit motel forces evacuation of guests + Survivors recount Syrian war toll at Bloomfield Hills event + Blacks slain in Michigan at 3rd-highest rate in US Politics RSS from The Detroit News + Apologetic Agema admits errors but won't resign + Snyder: Reform 'dumb' rules to allow more immigrants to work in Detroit + GOP leaders shorten presidential nominating season + Dems: Another 12,600 Michiganians lose extended jobless benefits + Mike Huckabee's comments on birth control gift for Dems + Granholm to co-chair pro-Clinton PAC for president + Republican panel approves tougher penalties for unauthorized early primary states + Michigan seeks visas to lure immigrants to Detroit + Peters raises $1M-plus for third straight quarter in Senate bid + Bill would let lawyers opt out of Michigan state bar + Michigan lawmakers launch more bills against sex trade + Balanced budget amendment initiative gets a jumpstart + Feds subpoena Christie's campaign, GOP + Poll: At Obama's 5-year point, few see a turnaround + Obama to release 2015 budget March 4 Front Page
Sunday January 19th
Saturday January 18th
Friday January 17th
Thursday January 16th
Tuesday January 14th
|