Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Pete Hoekstra repeats his support for tax increases


    By Republican Michigander, Section News
    Posted on Fri Jun 18, 2010 at 02:18:46 PM EST
    Tags: Pete Hoekstra, taxes (all tags)

    With the primary coming up, it helps to bring this back from the archives. Hoekstra came out for his tax increase around March 20th.

    From the Observor and Eccentric in Royal Oak


    The 57-year-old congressman from Holland told members of the Royal Oak Chamber of Commerce Wednesday that increased sales taxeswould "totally eliminate some other taxes." Specifically, he mentioned the small business and personal property taxes, both of which he said are hurting businesses in the state.
    "My preference is to spread the sales tax over a broader base and to raise the rate," Hoekstra said in response to a question. "There is no perfect tax system."
    Currently the state's 6 percent sales tax does not apply to groceries and medication.

    This isn't a secret. It's downplayed, but no secret, and it is probably a good reason that Hoekstra didn't get the Michigan Chamber endorsement. It's also a big reason why I'm supporting Mike Cox as the best alternative to the beltwayitis of Hoekstra.

    More below the fold ~

    I don't like the small business or personal property tax, but this small business owner is KILLED with a services tax.  Absolutely killed. Reduce the business taxes, yes, but don't KILL the services industry with a tax increase. Cut the damn spending.

    I stand by what I wrote the 20th.

    As I posted on March 20th:


    We all know Andy Dillon supports higher taxes, but I'm a little disappointed in Hoekstra. He was until this my second choice for governor, and one where I wouldn't have to hold my nose in supporting outside of that one bailout vote that left me a bit sour. Well, now the bailout vote isn't the only thing that has me sour.

    From the Detroit News

    Beverly Hills -- Two early poll leaders in the Michigan governor's race -- Democrat Andy Dillon and Republican Pete Hoekstra -- found more common ground than differences Friday in a rare joint appearance at Detroit Country Day School.
    They agreed term limits block political relationships in Lansing; it takes too long for businesses to get regulatory permits; right-to-work legislation would be too divisive; and the state needs to retool its tax system, including extending the sales tax to services.

    Extending the sales tax to services is a tax increase. We pay more for goods. More money goes to government which has proven itself unable to live within its means. Just as Pete Hoekstra voted to bailout the banks which fubared, he now wants to bail out government by taxing others like a democrat.

    Hoekstra said Michigan has a "crazy" business climate that drives investors to other states. He called for elimination of the Michigan Business Tax, as well as the levies businesses pay on equipment, and lowering the state income tax and the property tax on second homes to spur more out-of-state people to buy here. He favors initially ratcheting down the sales tax and extending it to services, but then going to voters to ask for a sales tax boost to offset reductions in other taxes</div>

    It's easy to be against the MBT. It was a poorly thought out rush job of a replacement to the bad Single Business Tax. (Thanks to Joe Hune for opposing that piece of crap). I oppose that too, but we have a spending problem more than a revenue problem, and punishing the types of businesses that may be growing is a piss poor way to spur growth. I'm fairly certain though that Pete Hoekstra's plan is a duplicate of self proclaimed "Business Leaders for Michigan" and Granholm's plan of a measly 1/2 cent cut on sales tax only to tax services at that race. It's a tax increase. Period, and needs to be opposed 100%. It was wrong when Granholm wanted a two penny tax. It's worse with BLFM's 5.5 cent per dollar tax increase.

    It was fiscal liberalism from Republicans that cost us both the state house and congress in 2006. We don't need more of the same. Pete Hoekstra unfortunately seems to have caught beltwayitis and is bringing it here. No thanks Pete, and I expected better from you.

    This one pisses me off. It's personal.

    < Celluoid Burns Like Napalm - Hanger 42 percent | A Michigan Smoking Ban Protest >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Depressing year to... (none / 0) (#1)
    by rdww on Sat Jun 19, 2010 at 09:25:54 AM EST
    ... be a Michigan Republican.  We have a stealth tax-raising machine politician, a rich guy RINO, and an opportunistic creep.


    I guess this never crossed Pete's mind... (none / 0) (#2)
    by LookingforReagan on Sat Jun 19, 2010 at 01:16:08 PM EST
    How about cutting spending? If the politicians in Lansing would stop spending more and more each year they would have less need to raise taxes. Many of the programs and departments created under the Czarina should and could be eliminated as being totally unnecessary. This would save millions. And taking a large axe to the number of state employee's also would save money. I will state this again. There is no reason with our diminished population that this state needs nearly 60,000 people working for it. In 1985 with a population of nearly eleven million the state government employed 32,000 and met it's obligations just fine. There are other areas that need to be addressed as well. Such as getting rid of all taxes in favor of a state Fair Tax and passing right to work legislation. If a healthy dose of guts and common sense are applied to the problems that face this state they can be solved. It really isn't difficult to figure out what needs to be done, the hard part is finding someone to lead this state that has the guts to apply the proper solutions.

    Hoekstra is a fiscal conservative (none / 0) (#3)
    by dnlchisholm on Sun Jun 20, 2010 at 05:39:49 PM EST
    to suggest or even imply otherwise is either dishonest or ignorant.

    Interesting (none / 0) (#5)
    by grannynanny on Sun Jun 20, 2010 at 10:26:33 PM EST
    Left very late Friday night for the cottage and had to stop at the rest stop just south of Grayling.  As I recall Two Penny Jenny put state workers back on toilet duty several years ago at these stops and needless to say it certainly shows.  How disgusting!  We hardly ever stop at rest stops but I will never stop again.

    Same goes at all of the marina's.  They were privatized and very well run.  Then Jenny decided guberment could do better - what a flippin joke.

    MTP is not a tax increase (none / 0) (#8)
    by jdwalshjr on Tue Jun 22, 2010 at 10:43:14 PM EST
    Our current tax code is driving away business and must be replace. Companies pay on average 3-4% more on state and local taxes in Michigan than the state we most often compete against for manufacturing or knowledge jobs. In today's global economy, that is the difference between whether or not you make a profit.

    Business CEO's and site location consultants view Michigan's business climate as among the worst of all fifty states. These perceptions are driven by their views on the cost and ease of doing business in Michigan.

    The Michigan Turnaround Plan is revenue neutral (read: no tax increase). We can balance the budget by making savings to state government (controlling pension costs, encouraging employees to retire, encouraging consolidation, etc.). It's not a tax increase. Let's be clear.
    See the details on the plan @ http://www.michiganturnaroundplan.com

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search