Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    How Grand


    By JGillman, Section News
    Posted on Mon Jun 20, 2011 at 02:41:13 PM EST
    Tags: Grand Traverse County, Grand Vision, Socialism, Agenda 21, Michigan, Grand Traverse, Sustainable Growth, Smart Growth, Visioning, Private Property (all tags)

    I have tried to write this a thousand times.  I am hoping it is understandable and sufficiently succinct.

    The nature of the way that government is influenced is becoming incredibly complicated.

    For the average person, it is often nearly too complicated to correctly know what certain groups represent, or WHY they wish to advance government in a particular direction, other than what might be stated as a flowery and appealing descriptive.  Positive reflections of outcomes wished for detailed in descriptive titles.

    Grand Visions. Sustainable Growth.  Smart Growth.  Regional Collaboration. Visioning.

    How could anything be wrong with that?  No one wants "bleak Visions," "corrosive growth," or stupid growth," or even "regional disagreement," right?  The descriptive labels can be misleading.  The method for deciding what growth is "smart," or who's vision we shall follow, is unfortunately-too-often a bit of a travel through the socialist myopic lens. One that means that we must all collaborate on what our neighbors should be allowed to do. Control of our community resources so that all (including our generational beneficiaries) may equally benefit, no matter their contribution.  Excluding those of course, who cannot survive the onslaught of new limits to their own plans.

    Its sometimes hard to explain all the ways in which this happens, so that people understand the insidious nature in which their best participatory intentions are twisted into a socialist Utopian tool.

    It requires a step back and an arms length review of the elements in play.

    ~ More below. ~

    What is it called in your neck of the woods?

    Up here its the "Grand Vision"

    With grand and glorious ideals the visioning claims the consensus of 15,000 on its website heading.  

    "15,000 people have spoken, pointing to a future for Northwest Michigan."

    How impressive.

    Covering a region so broadly to include: Antrim with 23,580 citizens, Benzie with 17,585, Grand Traverse with 86,986, Kalkaska with 17,153, Leelanau with 21,708, and Wexford with 32,735 means that the 199,747 FULL TIME residents of the community are being represented in a faux process.   Apparently 7.5% shall decide the future of zoning, road use, land use, rights of use within a 6 county region.

    No wait..  it was 7.5% that merely answered questionnaires.  Well actually 12,000, so it would be 6%, then some other folks who presumably are not counted again and participated in meetings.

    This merely offers visioning facilitators who offer leading questions, the ability to draw on a perceived power-through-numbers play.  Non elected facilitators, who by prestidigitation, offer as proof of support for their efforts, the sheer volume of people who have filled out a postcard.  Add to this the even smaller numbers of actual participants who have attended the collaborative events and study sessions and it surely seems as though the people have spoken!

    Never mind the simple health and safety that has always been the responsibility of government being addressed by such visionaries either.  Climate change, and the fairness to future generations of land resources must surely be considered.  Justice through the limitation of land use, and certainly urban sprawl through density planning is appropriate, right?

    No, not really.  As hard as it is for some people to realize, the limits on investments made in property and the resource management now being crafted through a "democratic" process are a bad thing.  The "future for Northwest Michigan" canard serves as an implied threat that to do without the planning efforts, would be to do without a future for Northwest Michigan.

    When one considers that alternative, it rightly appears as a silly statement.  We'll be here, and we'll be just fine.

    As I reach this point, I am shaking my head.  It is difficult to fully explain the rip-off that is going on up here.  Lets just start with a timeline from the Grand Vision site.

    • 2004: Hartman-Hammond bridge across the Boardman River and around downtown Traverse City, is put on hold
    • 2005: The Grand Vision originates from a regional, 34-member Land Use and Transportation Study (LUTS) Coordinating Group with the goal of shaping citizen-led, regional land use and transportation vision
    • 2005: A Federal Highway Association (FHWA) earmark for a Traverse City bypass study is re-authorized by Congress... The Grand Traverse County Board officially appoints the Land Use and Transportation Coordinating Group, known today at TC-TALUS. Its mission: Use a transparent and citizen-led discussion and process to ensure the development of a community vision.
    • 2007: Contracts are finalized with primary Grand Vision consultant Mead & Hunt, Inc. and subcontracts with Fregonese & Associates, Robert Grow, and Kimley-Horn. $261,351 in local matching dollars are raised
    • 2007: Grand Vision Public Involvement Committee is formed to get the word out about the process
    • 2007: A series of public information sessions and 10 Grand Vision workshops are held, where hundreds of citizens turn outfor each to share ideas for the future of the region
    • 2008: The Grand Vision's geographic scope is expanded from Grand Traverse to include a wider, six-county region. Additional public and private funds are secured to accommodate the growth
    • 2008: More than 12,000 local citizens "vote" in the Grand Vision Decision scorecard process, which allows the public to decide on priorities for the region's future
    • 2009: A final "vision" document is presented to the community in May 2009 describing a village and city-centered growth strategy, with six general priority areas: Growth & Investment, Affordable Housing, Transportation, Food & Farming, Energy and Natural Resources
    • 2009: Collaborative networks are formed around each of the priority areas
    • 2010: The Northwest Michigan Council of Government (NWMCOG) announces six Community Growth Grants - funded by the Kellogg Institute and administered by the NWMCOG - aimed to help implement the Grand Vision in local communities
    • 2010: The Grand Vision event in May turns out community members and leaders interested in learning more, getting involved and starting the work on Grand Vision-inspired projects
    • 2011: Citizen Summits are held by each of the network groups to highlight progress and opportunities to advance the Vision.
    • 2011: The Grand Vision enters the "implementation phase," highlighted by an annual Town Hall, the first of which to be held September 2011

    In 2005, the TCTALUS component was created by the Grand Traverse County Board to manage an earmark.  The continuing efforts are from the flies to manure effect that money has with rent seeking planners, and socialist manipulators.  The grant seeking has no end.  But there is little one can do without a critical press asking pertinent questions as the process is going on.

    To date, TALUS has cost taxpayers both locally and otherwise, HUNDREDS of thousands of dollars, with the excuse of it being an implementation team looking out for the Grand Vision.  That, and as the only planner for the GT County Road commission which expends $36,000 a year from an already deficit laden budget for its support.  My effort to strip the county funding that is approved by the board two months ago was temporary, and it resurfaced again this month.  Currently approved in the committee of the whole, it still must pass through the month end vote.

    What the Grand Vision in its entirety has cost, will be hard to calculate however.

    When such planning is passed through as "the will of the people" to local governments, it requires certain capitulation through those taxing authorities that can tip those who are already on the precipice financially.  Requirements both in taxation, and minor operating changes that a business cannot perform due to a change in rules of land use or outright restriction.

    The use of the 12,000 respondents who thought they were participating in a legitimate process was a scam.  But, leveraging 7 and a half percent of the regional population toward a socialist group-think land allocation and permissibility result is an amazing feat and should be respected.

    But in the way one might respect a sharp knife in the hands of a mugger.

    < Michigan Redistricting: Official Republican State House Map Released | Monday's Divertere: The Godless Count Grows >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Those who would harm us the most have found (none / 0) (#1)
    by RushLake on Tue Jun 21, 2011 at 05:59:05 AM EST
    that a short catchy descriptor for what they are doing is an easy thing for the masses to think they grasp and to repeat. Thus perhaps, "The Grand Vision". The proponents of such a thing can feed it to the selected news organizations (TV 9/10 news out of TC comes immediately to mind in your neck of the woods).

    I know people who never read anything, never go on line except to email jokes; who rely upon mass media to shape their vision of the world. One or two word sound bites is all they need. CNN, MSLSD, NBS, ABS, CBS anyone? "Hope" "Change".

    Years ago, abortion rights were sold to a lot of people because they were described as something to be used "only in the case of rape or incest" and would be "safe and rare". Who would want their sister to bear the child of a vile rapist? That's not what the proponents really believed because that's not how you destroy the black family unit and keep them dependent upon the liberal plantation and voting democrat.

    "Assault Weapons", "Saturday Night Special" "gun show loophole", "outdated second amendment", "gun buyback program", "the police are your friend".

    Conservatives tend to want to be clear in their message and that usually take more than two or three words.  

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search