NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
How GrandBy JGillman, Section News
I have tried to write this a thousand times. I am hoping it is understandable and sufficiently succinct.
The nature of the way that government is influenced is becoming incredibly complicated. For the average person, it is often nearly too complicated to correctly know what certain groups represent, or WHY they wish to advance government in a particular direction, other than what might be stated as a flowery and appealing descriptive. Positive reflections of outcomes wished for detailed in descriptive titles. Grand Visions. Sustainable Growth. Smart Growth. Regional Collaboration. Visioning. How could anything be wrong with that? No one wants "bleak Visions," "corrosive growth," or stupid growth," or even "regional disagreement," right? The descriptive labels can be misleading. The method for deciding what growth is "smart," or who's vision we shall follow, is unfortunately-too-often a bit of a travel through the socialist myopic lens. One that means that we must all collaborate on what our neighbors should be allowed to do. Control of our community resources so that all (including our generational beneficiaries) may equally benefit, no matter their contribution. Excluding those of course, who cannot survive the onslaught of new limits to their own plans. Its sometimes hard to explain all the ways in which this happens, so that people understand the insidious nature in which their best participatory intentions are twisted into a socialist Utopian tool. It requires a step back and an arms length review of the elements in play. ~ More below. ~
What is it called in your neck of the woods?
Up here its the "Grand Vision" With grand and glorious ideals the visioning claims the consensus of 15,000 on its website heading.
"15,000 people have spoken, pointing to a future for Northwest Michigan." How impressive. Covering a region so broadly to include: Antrim with 23,580 citizens, Benzie with 17,585, Grand Traverse with 86,986, Kalkaska with 17,153, Leelanau with 21,708, and Wexford with 32,735 means that the 199,747 FULL TIME residents of the community are being represented in a faux process. Apparently 7.5% shall decide the future of zoning, road use, land use, rights of use within a 6 county region. No wait.. it was 7.5% that merely answered questionnaires. Well actually 12,000, so it would be 6%, then some other folks who presumably are not counted again and participated in meetings. This merely offers visioning facilitators who offer leading questions, the ability to draw on a perceived power-through-numbers play. Non elected facilitators, who by prestidigitation, offer as proof of support for their efforts, the sheer volume of people who have filled out a postcard. Add to this the even smaller numbers of actual participants who have attended the collaborative events and study sessions and it surely seems as though the people have spoken! Never mind the simple health and safety that has always been the responsibility of government being addressed by such visionaries either. Climate change, and the fairness to future generations of land resources must surely be considered. Justice through the limitation of land use, and certainly urban sprawl through density planning is appropriate, right? No, not really. As hard as it is for some people to realize, the limits on investments made in property and the resource management now being crafted through a "democratic" process are a bad thing. The "future for Northwest Michigan" canard serves as an implied threat that to do without the planning efforts, would be to do without a future for Northwest Michigan. When one considers that alternative, it rightly appears as a silly statement. We'll be here, and we'll be just fine. As I reach this point, I am shaking my head. It is difficult to fully explain the rip-off that is going on up here. Lets just start with a timeline from the Grand Vision site.
To date, TALUS has cost taxpayers both locally and otherwise, HUNDREDS of thousands of dollars, with the excuse of it being an implementation team looking out for the Grand Vision. That, and as the only planner for the GT County Road commission which expends $36,000 a year from an already deficit laden budget for its support. My effort to strip the county funding that is approved by the board two months ago was temporary, and it resurfaced again this month. Currently approved in the committee of the whole, it still must pass through the month end vote. What the Grand Vision in its entirety has cost, will be hard to calculate however. When such planning is passed through as "the will of the people" to local governments, it requires certain capitulation through those taxing authorities that can tip those who are already on the precipice financially. Requirements both in taxation, and minor operating changes that a business cannot perform due to a change in rules of land use or outright restriction. The use of the 12,000 respondents who thought they were participating in a legitimate process was a scam. But, leveraging 7 and a half percent of the regional population toward a socialist group-think land allocation and permissibility result is an amazing feat and should be respected. But in the way one might respect a sharp knife in the hands of a mugger.
How Grand | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)
How Grand | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)
|