Now, does Politico care to address Larry Sinclair or Tony Rezko?

For what, you may ask.

Glad you did.  Herman Cain is scheduled to address a National Press Club luncheon today.  You can bet your bottom dollar that this will be fuel for multiple lines of questioning, all designed to throw Cain off his game.

This is how the progressives (regardless of party affiliation) work.  When they can't beat someone using rationally structured, reasonable arguments, then they'll throw as much mud as possible (praying that some of it will stick).  The more afraid they are, the quicker they go personal with their attacks.

Ann Coulter has a decent rebuttal on this; it's worth a watch.

That settles that.

Oh! ...and PaulTards, take your third Party ploy and GFY.

Cain told van Susteren that he remembered one woman who was a writer in the Association's communications department.  "I can't even remember her name, but I do remember the formal allegation she made in terms of sexual harassment," Cain said.  "I turned it over to my general counsel and one of the ladies that worked for me, the woman in charge of human resources.  They did investigate...and it was found to be baseless."

Van Susteren asked what Cain did that led to the accusation.  There were reportedly more than one accusations in the complaint, but Cain said he recalled just one incident.  "She was in my office one day, and I made a gesture saying -- and I was standing close to her -- and I made a gesture saying you are the same height as my wife.  And I brought my hand up to my chin saying, 'My wife comes up to my chin.'"  At that point, Cain gestured with his flattened palm near his chin.  "And that was put in there [the complaint] as something that made her uncomfortable," Cain said, "something that was in the sexual harassment charge."

Cain also offered new information about the settlement of the case.  Politico, which broke the sexual harassment allegation story, said that the woman received a money settlement "in the five-figure range."  When van Susteren asked about that, Cain said, "My general counsel said this started out where she and her lawyer were demanding a huge financial settlement...I don't remember a number...But then he said because there was no basis for this, we ended up settling for what would have been a termination settlement."  When van Susteren asked how much money was involved, Cain said.  "Maybe three months' salary.  I don't remember.  It might have been two months.  I do remember my general counsel saying we didn't pay all of the money they demanded."

As for reports that a second woman also complained about his behavior, Cain said, "I am totally unaware as to any formal charges coming from this other person."  Cain said he was told the woman's name by reporters at Politico. "I have no knowledge that she made a formal complaint," Cain said.

Cain told van Susteren that the woman worked in the Restaurant Association's government affairs department, working with the group's political action committee.  He said he seldom saw her.  As to the allegation that he might have made what Politico quoted as "an unwanted sexual advance" during a trip to Chicago, Cain said, "When we were at the restaurant show, I was constantly talking with different staff members about different issues.  If I had a private conversation with her, I don't recall it."