NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
Proposal 2 is Bad News. Vote NO!By Republican Michigander, Section News
A lot of hype and claims are being made about Proposal 2. I was leaning against when I saw the ballot language, and I'm staunchly against this now after I real the actual language. You'll find a lot of sites and reasons, scientific and otherwise attacking this proposal, but I'm going to stick with something I'm more familiar with. Language.
Here is the ballot summary language of Proposal 2. Unedited and verbatum. This is what you see on the ballot.
Proposal 2: See anything wrong with how this is written? I'll have to look up more precedents, but I have several concerns. I'll break down this, line by line. I assume attorneys wrote this, and every word there is for a reason.
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ADDRESS HUMAN EMBRYO AND HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH IN MICHIGAN First off, this is a Constitutional Amendment. That is the Supreme Law of Michigan, second only to the US Supreme Court. Secondly, it mentioned not just "stem cell" research, but Human Embryo research itself.
- Expand use of human embryos for any research permitted under federal law subject to the following limits: the embryos - ANY research. Federal law prohibits federal tax dollars going to embryonic stem cell research. That's it. Think of all the possibilities that can be used with embryo research. Cloning. Humam animal hybrids. etc.
- Prohibit any person from selling or purchasing human embryos for stem cell research. Why is only stem cell research mentioned here? Look at the words. Everything is added for a reason. This does not address for research besides embryonic stem cell research.
- Prohibit state and local laws that prevent, restrict, or discourage stem cell research, future therapies, and cures. Notice again how this is written. This is the worst line of the whole proposal, despite my otherwise libertarian leaning views. What does "discourage" mean? Blocking of tax money? I have no idea. Attorneys I know who I asked about this have no idea. I'm not sure if even a Georgetown grad could figure out the meaning of "discourage." Restrict is a rather broad word as well. The second part is written so it looks like it refers only to stem cell research. No, that's just one portion. "Future therapies." What is that? That can be anything. Cloning for cures? Therapies? The actual law is posted at MICAUSE, which is leading the fight against this.
Petition Language: Going over this:
(1) Nothing in this section shall alter Michigan's current prohibition on human cloning.
What is human cloning?
The prohibition is only limited to this: (1) An individual shall not intentionally engage in or attempt to engage in human cloning. Hybrids? That's being pushed in parts of England.
Combine with this: any research permitted under federal law on human embryos may be conducted in Michigan and then this.
(d) All stem cell research and all stem cell therapies and cures must be conducted and provided in accordance with state and local laws of general applicability, including but not limited to laws concerning scientific and medical practices and patient safety and privacy, to the extent that any such laws do not: Those words. "discourage, restrict" This is a poorly written proposal and a poorly written amendment for the constitution unless you want blanket immunity for God knows what. MICAUSE is right. 2 goes 2 far. That's an understatement. I'm voting Hell No on proposal 2.
Proposal 2 is Bad News. Vote NO! | 9 comments (9 topical, 0 hidden)
Proposal 2 is Bad News. Vote NO! | 9 comments (9 topical, 0 hidden)
|