Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Re: 2010 House Bill 5940 (Establish welfare and food stamp "bridge card" restrictions )


    By BobV01, Section News
    Posted on Sat Mar 20, 2010 at 11:46:24 AM EST
    Tags: Fathers (all tags)

    Welcome to Michigan land of the Unemployed and overburdened. Please consider a Mother goes to Court seeking either establishment of Paternity or dissolution of a relationship, the Court does not enter Judgment for half a year or more and then the Financial Child Support is retro-active creating immediate arrearages.

    Michigan FOCs are slow or refuse to order Child Support Withholding from Unemployment Benefits creating arrearages, even if the Fathers has notified FOC of a change in Unemployment. FOC is slow or refuses to order Support Withholding from Michigan State Income Tax refunds, even if the Father Notifies Friend of the Court to assert their priority position ahead of other creditors. Friend of the Court does NOT respond to changes in a financial child support payors employment status, FOC may review once every two years, that is not the norm, and FOC is not responsive to change in employment status. FOC barely pays attention to the Legislature, Legislative Intent or the Best Interest of the Child. There are Fathers living on the streets or worse unable to maintain finacial viability (pay rent, utilities and indebtedness) while also paying child support, 1 out of ten are unemployed, and there is an increased cost to a Non Physical Custody Father simply trying to maintain his bond with his child(ren) while Mothers seek never ending creative ways to distance  the children from the Father. This has been the case in Michigan for thirty years. This happens to about half of Michigan's GOPers, does anyone bother to understand the problem and the extent to which you continue to promote Fatherless children and exacerbate the situation? Mothers are not the solution, economic redistribution to Mothers is not the solution, it compounds the situation. Seek an economic disincentive to single mothers and watch the number of Fatherless children decline.
    http://www.michiganvotes.org/forum/forums/p/63376/277709.aspx#277709
    < Stupak's Health Care Press Conference | Why some a leery of the Health Care Legislation >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    Poll

    Should Michigan Promote Fatherhood
    No
    Yes
    Of course Fathers are critical to their children's development
    No, Moms don't save they spend and we need that cash in the economy

    Votes: 3
    Results | Other Polls
    create account | faq | search