Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Government Regulation: A Self-fulfilling Prophecy of Harm


    By jgillmanjr, Section News
    Posted on Thu May 21, 2009 at 12:34:31 PM EST
    Tags: Government Regulation, FDA, Tobacco, Window Lickers (all tags)

    (Promoted by Nick...)

    Originally posted in CM-Life.

    Many people, mostly through ignorance, believe that government regulation and oversight of virtually every aspect of our lives is required so that shysters don't take our money in ponzi schemes or we aren't subject to the availability of harmful substances.

    After all, the government knows best, right? That's the flawed premise that proponents of government regulation operate on; we aren't smart enough to keep ourselves secure. It's that flawed belief that also leads to a greater threat to our own well being.

    Take the Bernie Madoff scandal for example.

    John Stossel brings up the point that Madoff didn't swindle your average Joe, but rather well educated investors (http://tinyurl.com/bst7l4). The are certainly not dumb people.

    They got lazy though and didn't want to verify the legitimacy of their investments. Why? Probably because the Securities and Exchange Commission had tacitly given its blessing to Madoff by not being in the process of investigating him.

    Read Stossel's column in it's entirety and you'll find out that someone outside of the government actually realized that Madoff was making offers that were too good to be true. The SEC didn't care about his alerts though.

    Governmental regulation and oversight does nothing but provide a false sense of security for those not wiling to practice diligence. In cases where regulation is used in an attempt to thwart fraud, there will always be people that can, and will, get passed it.

    The ironic thing is that the government even acknowledges this in a piece of pending legislation that would give the FDA authority to regulate tobacco products. According to the bill, it would be illegal for statements to be made, either through the media or labeling, that the tobacco products are regulated by the FDA (http://tinyurl.com/cn3m5w).

    There would be no reason at all for the bill to contain this wording, other than that the bill's author realizes that knowledge of product regulation will lead some people to believe that tobacco products are safe.

    So if such holds true for tobacco products, where almost everyone realizes the danger it poses, why would it not hold true for things that a great majority of people wouldn't understand? It's pretty clear that government regulation leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy of harm.

    < Michigan Unemployment almost 13% | Rep. Meekhof Video Update >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Catch-22 (none / 0) (#1)
    by Rougman on Fri May 22, 2009 at 09:57:50 AM EST
    Those who are adamantly pro-regulation tend to be vehemently anti-corporation.  This is not always the case but most people who support the regulation of all things do so out of a severe distrust of who the determine is greedy.

    These two thoughts are, in the real world, directly opposed to one other, or at least they are to those that do not have squirrels running around in their heads.  

    Big government demanding big regulation creates a commercial atmosphere in which only the largest corporate bureaucracies can operate.  How many small pharmaceutical companies can afford to bring a new drug to market?  How many small oil companies can pay the $500,000 a day it costs to operate a drilling platform in the deep water gulf?  How many small corporations or individuals could ever afford to bring a new car to market with all the regulations? Here in Michigan we even have our state government openly advocating policy that virtually guarantees a monopoly for our two largest energy suppliers.  Do these people not even sense a problem with this?

    The incessant blathering I hear about not having enough regulations would be a lot easier to listen to if it wasn't for the deathly weight of regulation keeping many of our largest corporations from facing the natural competition that a true free-market economy would create.

    The catch-22 goes something like this.  The big corporations are so big and so greedy that we must create regulations that only the biggest and greediest of corporations can afford to comply with. Few else can even consider getting into the game.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search