I was at the Republican Convention earlier this year and the word "inclusive" irritated me as well.

For one, the intent of the word was to be accepting of black people, and therefore, it's utterance was an assumption that the room was full of racists.

Two, the other manner in which it was used was a direct attempt at "softening the party" on social issues such as abortion.

Even when work/eat/own is exampled by a majority of people, it's viewed as something white folk get to do 'cause they're white. Even when one has clearly shared about the work/eat and OWN, it's strenuously rejected for a preference for redistribution. The resentment behind this ideology is driven by the rich and powerful who are highly educated, mostly politicians, celebrities, and educators.

The (driven) ideology causes many black folk to view their fellow citizens (who happen to be white) as the bad guys who are powerful and keeping them down or not hiring them. The same 'drivers' of said ideology are the ones who lock people into schools that refuse to teach them any better: See DPS's. This also causes a lack of education in even the most entry level jobs where simple arithmetic and literacy would be required. Attempted discussion on this vicious cycle has been met with resentment, part of the vicious cycle of the driven ideology.

The truth is, the fellow citizens who happen to be white and black and know better, are not the rulers of anything. They are just the ones left holding the bag.

The real median earnings of men who worked full time year-round, climbed in 2006/2007 from about $43K to $45K. If they get married to a woman who is gainfully employed there is the added burden of being moved into a higher taxed bracket. These people are treated like the enemy who are keeping others down when actually they are being kept down. How does one get the focus onto the real problem?

How does one continue to share this with those who don't WANT to hear? How does one share with those who say that 'others' need to reach out, yet are rejected and ridiculed in the very areas explicitly requested? What does one do about an obvious 'busy work' at play here with a 'please lobby me' on something I already know I'll reject? How does one explain that the focus is on the fellow citizens who deal with these same policies and the focus should be on those who actually create the policies and school districts and union thugs who take everyone's money in order to support said policy? How does one point out that the ONLY people who are making out are these unions, celebrities, and politicians? How does one say, look at Michael Moore? Isn't he saying that capital is bad while he continues to increase his capital?

How can the game of fostering understandable resentment be overcome so it isn't a personal pathology predominate in the black community?  

I think for too long the Republican Party has tried to make itself more attractive to certain constituencies by remolding itself for the sake of recruitment.  This is how we have come to find some Republican legislators favoring minimum wage hikes and why others can buy into whatever the bailout of the month special happens to be.  There are countless other examples and they all hurt the party.

There are few constituencies that have been more bombarded with the messages of entitlement, envy, and victimhood than has the black community.  Socialism sells quite well regardless of where it is being sold, but when specific communities hear the same message from nearly all angles it becomes particularly effective.

I believe that whites can help with the recruitment of black people into the conservative movement, but it will still have to be accomplished primarily at the street level.  It will have to be accomplished through the teaching of sound economics in school.  It will have to be taught through the rewards of hard work in teenage jobs.  It will have to be taught through the structure of a nurturing family.  It will have to be taught above the blatherings of self proclaimed black leaders such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. (Thomas Sowell, anyone?)

Sadly, what we have in place now is a teaching industry beholden to union economic theory, a job market wiped out by a government that punishes successful businesses, and a family unit being attacked by government policy that has systematically rewarded family dysfunction.