Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    BREAKING: Schauer chief of staff caught making "odious" anti-Semitic comments


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 11:27:34 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    I try to keep things pretty light here on the site but every now and again there's an issue that comes up that just punches you in the gut.  A situation that reminds you that there's a dark underbelly to our society and an element that refuses to die, no matter how much we'd like to pretend it doesn't exist.

    Are these the sorts of people Mark Schauer surrounds himself with?  Bigots and anti-Semites?  Probably not the best strategy when you're running for Congress and yet according to today's Battle Creek Enquirer, The Senate Minority Leader's chief of staff Ken Brock is going around the district playing the race card in an attempt to clear the primary field.

    BCE reports:

    Democratic state Sen. Mark Schauer is psyched to take (Cong. Walberg) on, vowing to amass $3 million by next year. His chief of staff, Ken Brock, seemed to channel the odiousness of Karl Rove earlier this month, bragging that only Schauer can raise that kind of money, unlike "liberal, Jewish trial lawyer" David Nacht or "lazy" Jim Berryman, for whom Brock twice worked.

    You can practically hear the derision in his voice as he spits out the words "liberal, Jewish."  

    David Nacht may very well be liberal and he may very well be a trial lawyer and those are things that may very well be important in a Congressional race.  But what, Mr. Brock, does his Jewish heritage have to do with anything?

    I don't know Mr. Nacht.  I've never met the man.  And I'm all but certain that we'd agree on next to nothing politically.  But I'm one-hundred percent certain we'd agree that a 21st Century Democrat Congressional Primary is no place for anti-Semitic rhetoric.

    And Schauer's reaction thus far?  Silence.  There's been no action.  No statement.  No apology.  Yet Susan Demas' article in the BCE indicates Brock made these statements earlier in the month.

    Every time you think we've made progress as a society... as a people... someone comes along and reminds you that there's still a long ways left to go.  Ken Brock shouldn't just be ashamed of himself.  He should be offering an apology from the unemployment line.

    < Labor Day 2007- Union Corruption, Greed, and Liberal Politics | Another reason early release is a potentially tragic idea: Matthew Macon >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Whoa, silence from our Democrat friends. (none / 0) (#1)
    by John Galt on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 12:30:10 PM EST
    I'm still waiting for NoviDemoncrat and Commie Guru stepping up to condemn anti-semitism in all of its forms, no matter Republican or Democrat.

    Sadly, we'll get apologetics and excuses.

    In a recent thread, it was discussed about how "those who claim the high road will fall harder."

    This is pretty outrageous.  I'd hope for better from our friends on the left, but are they really as anti-racist as they claim to be?

    I've got more hope than you, JG (none / 0) (#2)
    by Nick on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 01:21:47 PM EST
    I don't anticipate anyone coming to the defense of this guy.  

    Brock/Schauer (none / 0) (#3)
    by Republican Michigander on Fri Aug 31, 2007 at 01:29:51 PM EST
    I oftentimes say "Scratch a leftist, and find a fascist." Brock may fit the mold.

    As far as Schauer goes, his agenda is power. He's the type of guy who talked pro-gun election time, voted for all gun grab bills to please leadership, except for the final CCW bill where he flipped to tell all of us how good he is on the issue. The first word to come to mind with him - weasel.

    Personal attacks (1.00 / 1) (#5)
    by Communications Guru on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 09:16:41 AM EST
    "Commie Guru." Well, I'm more of a patriotic American than you will ever be. I guess when you got nothing personal attacks always work.

     It seems a little over the top to condemn someone for an employee allegedly saying one word taken according to a columnist who paraphrased. It have no idea how it was said, and I would like to hear the entire quote. But still, I agree with you in part, and I think Mr. Brock should apologize. I met Mr. Nacht and heard him speak. I don't know if he's Jewish, and I don't really care. So I don't know if the statement he's a "liberal, Jewish trial lawyer" is an accurate statement or not. I know this, those attributes are not bad things, in fact they good things to be.It just seems ironic to me that people who count Ann Coulter as their hero and spokesperson would condemn a guy for one stupid word.

    But again, Mr. Brock should apologize, both publicly and privately, and in the end, Ken Brock does not have my vote.


    See, JG? We can all get along. (none / 0) (#6)
    by Nick on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 11:23:53 AM EST
    Just to be clear, too, I've never defended Ann Coulter and never will.  She's a repugnant woman.  

    I've never purchased a book.  I don't read her columns.  When she comes on TV I change the channel.

    She's a hack peddling politics as entertainment on the lowest common denominator and I think she's done far more harm than good to the conserative cause.  I wish she'd just go away.  I don't even find her remotely attractive and wonder what people are thinking when they say she's "hot."

    And another point of "clarity," I'm not condemning Schauer, yet.  I'm more than willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that this is the first time he's heard that his staffer's an anti-Semite.  

    Now he has a chance to do the right thing.  

    I don't believe in "getting along" (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by John Galt on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 12:28:02 PM EST
    I don't think it's a matter of "all getting along", when the other side is willing to bait us into eating our own.  Commie Guru doesn't like his nickname, and that's alright.  In the same sentence he talks about personal insults, he uses a personal insult.  Go figure - do as I say not as I do, the Democrat Mantra.

    Bringing up Ann Coulter can only serve one of two purposes - either excusing Ken Brock's comment by saying "your side has bigots, too" (which wouldn't be surprising from the party of "No Values"), or to get us to change the subject by bashing a conservative (again) and ignoring the problem at hand (Ken Brock's bigotry).

    I'm glad Commie Guru was able to say that the guy should apologize.  I'm disappointed that Commie Guru didn't go that step further, like your post, and ask for his resignation.

    Personal Insult? (1.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Communications Guru on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 01:32:45 PM EST
    Personal Insult? A personal insult against whom? Show me a personal insult, Mr. Galt. Again, I'm by far the more patriotic American than you can ever dream to be, so name-calling from the likes of you doesn't bother me. But don't expect me, or anyone else, to accept or answer to an offensive nickname you made up based on your imagination.

    As for Nick, I hear you talking, but that's' all with regards to your mouthpiece. You have the audacity to say you are not" condemning Schauer," but in your original post you say "Are these the sorts of people Mark Schauer surrounds himself with?  Bigots and anti-Semites?" Apparently, truth and honesty are not your strong points are they?

    Oh heavens... (none / 0) (#9)
    by Nick on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 01:45:27 PM EST
    you read THAT as a condemnation?  I think it's more than fair to ask.  Schauer has a chance to answer it but firing his anti-Semite Chief of Staff.

    • Oh Heavens... by Communications Guru, 09/01/2007 02:44:25 PM EST (1.00 / 1)
    If (none / 0) (#11)
    by Nick on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 03:52:45 PM EST
    You think it's ok for a Congressional candidate to surround himself with anti-Semites on his payroll, that's your business.  

    But if that's the case, you should be ashamed of yourself, too.  

    There's no place in politics... in society... for that sort of repulsive behavior.

    What...? (none / 0) (#12)
    by Communications Guru on Sat Sep 01, 2007 at 04:35:08 PM EST
    Apparently, I may have been wrong in my last comment. You must have a problem with reading comprehension.

    Personal Insults, Strawmen Arguments (none / 0) (#13)
    by John Galt on Sun Sep 02, 2007 at 11:29:00 AM EST
    Again, I'm by far the more patriotic American than you can ever dream to be, so name-calling from the likes of you doesn't bother me. But don't expect me, or anyone else, to accept or answer to an offensive nickname you made up based on your imagination.

    Ahhh, more insults.  You're good at the double-faced vitriol we've come to expect from Democrat operatives.  "I'm not insulting you, you idiot."

    It's a shame, I much like calling you Commie Guru.  If you're really running away from your progressive values, maybe we can drop the moniker as you pickup some conservative values.

    As for Nick, I hear you talking, but that's' all with regards to your mouthpiece. You have the audacity to say you are not" condemning Schauer," but in your original post you say "Are these the sorts of people Mark Schauer surrounds himself with?  Bigots and anti-Semites?" Apparently, truth and honesty are not your strong points are they?

    Democrat strawman argument.  Calling for action isn't condemnation.  If the Mediocre State Senator sends Ken Brock to the unemployment lines, we'll know how he feels about having anti-semite bigots on his staff.  Otherwise, we'll know that he condones that kind of behavior - and would be condemned.

    But what I get out of your attacks on Nick are that you support Sen. Schauer employing bigots and anti-semites.  Shame on you, Commie.  Shame.

    Strawman? (none / 0) (#14)
    by Communications Guru on Sun Sep 02, 2007 at 02:36:16 PM EST
    Yes, shame on me for pointing out your lies, misrepresentation and spin. I don't get how you jump to the conclusion that I am abandoning my progressive ideals if I object to you falsely calling me a communist. I spent 20 years in the military, so I don't get how I can be a communist. However, a bigger insult would be to call me a conservative.

    But you'd vote for a guy (none / 0) (#17)
    by Nick on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 01:15:42 AM EST
    who refuses to hold accountable his chief of staff who runs around the district attempting to insult people by calling them "jewish?"

    "Jewish" is NOT an insult!  It is not dirty.  It is not wrong.  It's nothing to be ashamed of.  It's not a problem.  It doesn't make someone worse than someone else.

    And if Schauer doesn't realize that and act accordingly then he's complicit in Brock's anti-Semitism and has no place running for dog catcher, let alone Congress.

    Shame on him and shame on you for not demanding he fire Brock immediately.

    Racist Is as Racist Does (none / 0) (#18)
    by John Galt on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 10:24:01 AM EST
    Hillary Clinton and the "Plantation" remarks, and the failed "mahatma ghandi gas station" joke.
    Joe Biden about Barack Obama being a "articulate, clean, well-dressed black man."
    Robert Byrd was a full-fledged white-sheet member of the KKK.

    Democrats have no problems with racists and bigots.  They find ways to excuse their behavior and give them passes.  

    But then our Democrat friends demand that we condemn Ann Coulter?  A non-elected conservative, that they can't give us the quotes for?  And yet, they can holler up and down she's a racist.  Ed Schultz claims Hannity's a racist over some Vick comment (whose quotes I can't find, either).

    It's continued appeasement of Democrats and their quest for "The Double Standard" leaves me baffled.  Commie Guru has enough evidence that there should be an apology, but not enough for the guy to get reprimanded or fired.

    It never ceases to amaze me (none / 0) (#19)
    by PMOTVRWC on Mon Sep 03, 2007 at 10:55:56 AM EST
    that democrats can and do defend the indefensible within their own party.  

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    Related Links

    + BCE reports
    + Also by Nick
    create account | faq | search