What you're describing sounds like the problems found in gov't schools that many are avoiding by attending charters. Attaching these problems to charters is simple talking points being repeated. You've done nothing to help the sincerity of my questions, if that was even your objective.

Having schools that are not required to increase/profit/keep up but just suck hind titty can be studied in Detroit. It would seem wise to avoid anything that would support/promote/allow for that type of situation and lack of good outcomes for students.

It's interesting when a lack of concern for real learning for real students is apparent in connection to gov't schools.