NAVIGATION
|
Your New Scoop SiteWelcome to Scoop! To help you figure things out, there is a Scoop Admin Guide which can hopefully answer most of your questions. Some tips:
For support, questions, and general help with Scoop, email support@scoophost.com ScoopHost.com is currently running Scoop version Undeterminable from . |
Tag: abortion (page 5)By jenkuz, Section News
Cross-posted
Fred Upton got the post he wanted in the House, as Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Boehner gave him the job over massive objections from conservatives. Perhaps if Upton cries, he will convince some of them that he's going to be a real stalwart. JGillman of RightMichigan voices the concern that so many are thinking. Now that Upton got the post over all the objections, will he do what needs doing? Judging from some of his responses to criticism, I'd say that's a definite no. He said he was going to Washington to repeal that healthcare law, then he agreed to support the insertion of Pitt's Protect Life Act, and Smith's No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act into the law. That's called nibbling around the edges. The way the genius Republican leadership has been going, if the acts do end up being inserted, they will become known as the Stupak amendment for criminy's sake. Why in the world would you say you were going to repeal it, but first change it a little to make it better, then repeal it? Does that make sense? (3 comments, 470 words in story) Full Story By jenkuz, Section News
Cross-posted at jennerationx.com
Uh oh. Fred Upton, a Republican from Michigan, is insisting he is worthy to chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and has written an Op Ed in the Washington Examiner titled, "Rep. Fred Upton: A new majority for America." In it, he describes what he will do if in fact he is chosen as chair, and reiterates his manly chainsaw approach to the budget, and unfortunately, uses the words, "shine the spotlight" on the Obama-Pelosi regulatory policies. Hang on, check the spotlight bulb first, is it the government-mandated type? (1 comment, 711 words in story) Full Story By JGillman, Section News
Bart Stupak was one of the first congress critters to self destruct and became quite toxic when voting for the Obamacare plan that does indeed provide a mechanism where babies can be slaughtered in the womb with payment by taxpayers. He betrayed the trust of his constituents, a decidedly right to life community of Upper Peninsula and Northern Lower Michiganders.
Stupaks betrayal came at a cost. He realized quickly enough that his upcoming campaign was probably a lost cause, and announced his decision to not run for reelection April 9, 2010. In fact, many of those critters still pursuing the dream of perpetual political payoff through a lifetime of "service" are realizing they "stepped in it," and are currently running back home shaking off their jackboots so maybe it doesn't stink so much come November 2nd. The spell apparently has been broken, and the realization that overstepping constitutional authority might come at a cost. They are pretending THEY didn't support the health care plan... though they might have voted for it.. another case of what "is.. is.." perhaps. They have gained new smarts as judgment day approaches in a month from now. ~ more below ~ (479 words in story) Full Story By apackof2, Section News
State Representative Paul Opsommer announced today the introduction of HB 6075, which he said was a necessary step to regulate abortion coverage under national healthcare if the Cox lawsuit is not successful.
"I do not trust a temporary executive order to make sure we're not using taxpayer money to perform abortions",said Opsommer
Either do we! (1 comment, 101 words in story) Full Story By JGillman, Section News
Bart Stupak in many ways cornered himself into a no win position as the health care debate drew down and the vote neared. He tried to walk the tightrope of partisan divide, and understood full well his conservative supporters of the last 18 years were counting on him to hold up to their trust. They didn't want expansion of abortion paid for by tax dollars, and he said it wasn't going to happen. He postured for "the fight," and half of us actually believed he might hold to his stated principles.
In the end he caved, based on the promise of executive will. I suppose he hoped that his constituents would believe the executive order signed by the President might actually have some effect of law. It may theoretically, but it cannot be enforced effectively, and Hyde will not cover the new departments and provisions. But he must have known it, but he aired up his chest and exclaimed he was taking the high and moral road.. (4 comments, 810 words in story) Full Story By Theblogprof, Section News
Rick Snyder is a bit of an enigma. One year ago, I wouldn't have been able to tell you who the heck he was. Yet, here we are month away from the GOP primary and Snyder is in the running for the nomination according to polls. I would like the opportunity to ask him personally, but he seems to have shied away from social issues altogether, painting himself as a fiscal conservative. That may be so, but being part conservative and part either unknown or so-called 'moderate' isn't going to play well here in MI (for instance, see John McCain circa 2008, who got blown out in this state). Without Snyder going on record with his views outside the fiscal side, conservatives have been forced to resort to indirect data. Last week, he dodged a question at a townhall in Ann Arbor when asked when life begins. It's a simple enough question, mind you. Thus, that incident got added to my list of indirect data that includes:
What's up with the non-answer answer? It's obvious that I am not the only conservative in the state that wants to know. Anyone from the Snyder camp explain your candidate's stance on the life issue with specifics rather than deflections? Seriously - I have to know! (11 comments) Comments >> By Theblogprof, Section News
A few weeks ago I pondered a very important conservative issue in this post: Is MI GOP Gubernatorial candidate Rick Snyder a pro-abort? Not having so much as even met Rick Snyder yet, the indirect evidence was to say the least disturbing, albeit not 100% conclusive. Indirect evidence from that prior post:
I haven't gotten to ask Snyder about the abortion issue yet, but someone got to ask him a related question just the other day at a Rick Snyder townhall in Ann Arbor. The results unfortunately are mixed. From AnnArbor.com: Gubernatorial candidate Rick Snyder tells Ann Arbor crowd Michigan needs a nerd. I'll just cut to the chase on the pro-life issue: More below the fold... (2 comments, 374 words in story) Full Story By JGillman, Section News
Today Bart Stupak did a call in to WTCM in Traverse City for a Ron Jolly interview. I imagine he will get to repeat himself many times today, but in the face of the duplicitous outward statements in the run up to the health care vote he has to some degree painted himself into a corner, and came off sounding like Tiger Woods avoiding an explanation of why he cheated on his wife.
Ultimately the truth be told, it was as he said in the August town hall, he was going to vote for this no matter what. Weren't you Mr. Stupak? Mr. Stupak will not acknowledge the conflict of his "pro-life position" with the contradictory vote his record will carry forward. Insisting that President Bush signed an executive order banning embryonic stem cell funding by government and it carried the same weight as Obama's exec order.
"Take a look at what Bush signed.. its no different" Actually Bart? IT is quite a bit different. Given that president Bush did not want the funding to exist, he signed into law to protect life as long as he was able. He did not have the favor of a legislative act in front of him, and felt he needed to do something. He stood up for something he believed in. And guess what? Your guy, Barack Obama rescinded the order upon taking office. There is more.. below the fold. (4 comments, 870 words in story) Full Story
|
External FeedsMetro/State News RSS from The Detroit News+ Metro Detroit to get even colder + I-96 shootings trial set to resume + $200M deck replacement planned for Mackinac Bridge + Oakland County's Patterson swipes at Detroit — again + Stray dog survey finds fewer than 3,000 on Detroit streets + MDOT assessing sinkhole damage in downtown Detroit + Police search for grandfather after 4-year-old's shooting death + Detroit police officials to discuss stop-and-frisk + Metal thefts persist amid Michigan debate for tougher scrapping laws + King's legacy resonates as Metro Detroiters pitch in + Arctic air makes week-long return to Detroit area + Detroit cops search for missing woman, 78, who has Alzheimer's + Ferguson's retrial on bid-rigging charges begins Tuesday + Detroit Auto show provides tantalizing possibilities for household vehicle + 2 killed in separate crashes, Detroit-area freeways reopen after accidents Politics RSS from The Detroit News + MLK observances include Michigan gubernatorial rivals + Snyder renews call for 'civility' in political debate + New Jersey lieutenant governor: Aid-for-development claim false + GOP image still muddled, a year after suggestions + Michigan insurer doubtful of net jump in plans sold + Probe of Christie case to expand + Obama: Pot a bad habit, not worse than alcohol + Giuliani: N.J. governor faces 'partisan witch hunt' + State aid for Detroit may be tough sell in Capitol + Gov. Snyder says challenges to Detroit bankruptcy 'stressful' amid efforts to resolve it + Obama: 2014 can be breakthrough year for U.S. + Stabenow: Compromise on farm bill 'just days away' + Supreme Court takes cases on cellphone searches + Player in New Jersey bridge scandal will talk for immunity + Judge spikes photo ID requirement for Pennsylvania voters Front Page
Thursday January 16th
Tuesday January 14th
Monday January 13th
Sunday January 12th
Saturday January 11th
Friday January 10th
|