Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed

    • Your New Scoop Site

    Welcome to Scoop!

    To help you figure things out, there is a Scoop Admin Guide which can hopefully answer most of your questions.

    Some tips:

    • Most of the layout is changed in "Blocks", found in the admin tools menu
    • Features can be turned on and off, and configured, in "Site Controls" in the admin tools menu
    • Stories have an "edit" link right beside the "Full Story" link on an index page, and right beside the "Post a Comment" link on the full story page. They can also be edited by clicking the story title in the "Story List" admin tool
    • Boxes are what allow you to write new features for Scoop; they require a knowledge of the perl programming language to work with effectively, although you can often make small changes without knowing much perl. If you would like a feature added but cannot program it yourself, ScoopHost does custom Scoop programming as one of its services.
    • If you aren't sure where to look for a particular feature or piece of display, try the "Search Admin Tools" link in the admin tools menu.

    For support, questions, and general help with Scoop, email support@scoophost.com

    ScoopHost.com is currently running Scoop version Undeterminable from .

    Tag: Article the First

    The Real Eleventh Amendment


    By Kevin Rex Heine, Section News
    Posted on Thu Jul 12, 2012 at 06:21:51 PM EST
    Tags: Electoral College, presidential elections, Congressional Apportionment Amendment, Article the First, Apportionment Act of 1911, Reapportionment Act of 1929, Apportionment Act of 1941, U. S. House of Representatives, decennial census, apportionment methodology, LaVergne v Bryson et al - Docket # 12-1171, U. S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, potentially Amendment XXVIII (all tags)

    What do you do with a duly ratified amendment to the U. S. Constitution that has not actually been added to the Constitution?  What do you do if that amendment potentially renders unconstitutional a long-standing federal statute (that has been in place for about 91 years)?  What do you do if that amendment, which was properly ratified 220 years ago, may have prevented the federal statute in question from having been enacted in the first place?


    (2 comments, 1535 words in story) Full Story

    Menu

    + create account
    + FAQ
    + Editorial Policy
    + Search


    Advertise on RightMichigan.com

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    External Feeds

    Metro/State News RSS from The Detroit News
    + Craig: Cushingberry tried twice to elude police, was given preferential treatment
    + Detroit police arrest man suspected of burning women with blowtorch
    + Fouts rips video as 'scurrilous,' defends Chicago trip with secretary
    + Wind, winter weather hammer state from Mackinac Bridge to southeast Mich.
    + Detroit Cass Tech QB Campbell expected to be released from custody Friday
    + New water rates range from -16% to +14%; see change by community
    + Detroit's bankruptcy gets controversial turn in new Honda ad
    + Royal Oak Twp., Highland Park in financial emergency, review panels find
    + Grosse Ile Twp. leads list of Michigan's 10 safest cities
    + Wayne Co. sex crimes backlog grows after funding feud idles Internet Crime Unit
    + Judge upholds 41-60 year sentence of man guilty in Detroit firefighter's death
    + Detroit man robbed, shot in alley on west side
    + Fire at Detroit motel forces evacuation of guests
    + Survivors recount Syrian war toll at Bloomfield Hills event
    + Blacks slain in Michigan at 3rd-highest rate in US

    Politics RSS from The Detroit News
    + Apologetic Agema admits errors but won't resign
    + Snyder: Reform 'dumb' rules to allow more immigrants to work in Detroit
    + GOP leaders shorten presidential nominating season
    + Dems: Another 12,600 Michiganians lose extended jobless benefits
    + Mike Huckabee's comments on birth control gift for Dems
    + Granholm to co-chair pro-Clinton PAC for president
    + Republican panel approves tougher penalties for unauthorized early primary states
    + Michigan seeks visas to lure immigrants to Detroit
    + Peters raises $1M-plus for third straight quarter in Senate bid
    + Bill would let lawyers opt out of Michigan state bar
    + Michigan lawmakers launch more bills against sex trade
    + Balanced budget amendment initiative gets a jumpstart
    + Feds subpoena Christie's campaign, GOP
    + Poll: At Obama's 5-year point, few see a turnaround
    + Obama to release 2015 budget March 4

    Front Page

    Sunday January 19th
    + Betsy DeVos Sets The Wrong Table (5 comments)
    + Ummm, maybe it would have been a good idea to read that fine print? (3 comments)

    Saturday January 18th
    + $10+ Billion Dollars Leaves Michigan in Just One Year (3 comments)
    + Unconstitutionality Of Energy Mandates (4 comments)
    + Saturdays Divertere: Your Tax Dollars at... (2 comments)

    Friday January 17th
    + Who Do You Think You're Fooling? (3 comments)

    Thursday January 16th
    + Don't Bail Out Detroit (4 comments)
    + Arcand 1st District Republican Primary Announcement (6 comments)

    Tuesday January 14th
    + Twitiot Of The Day: Oakland Co. Edition (0 comments)
    + AFP Targets Peters For Obamacare Role (5 comments)

    Older Stories...

    create account | faq | search