NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
The Power Of The PurseBy JGillman, Section News
Dear congressman, keep your damned finger off my chest.
Dr Benishek, you may not have realized it, but the minute that fat digit put its pressure on my breastbone and the words "We don't control the spending" came out, you lost a hell of a lot of respect and support from this concerned (and informed) citizen. I have thought long and hard on how to broach this subject since our convention discussion. Could it be that you do not understand your role as a congressman, and the powers vested in you and the house of representatives? Perhaps you still do not understand that the power of the purse is yours, but Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 is clear. "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time." MY own opinions notwithstanding, there are other more scholarly types who would agree; congress CAN stop Obamacare, NSA, the IRS, HUD, EPA etc., and there is little the president can do. Heritage puts it this way: "The Appropriations Clause is the cornerstone of Congress's "power of the purse." It assigns to Congress the role of final arbiter of the use of public funds. The source of Congress's power to spend derives from Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. The Appropriations Clause provides Congress with a mechanism to control or to limit spending by the federal government. The Framers chose the particular language of limitation, not authorization, for the first part of the clause and placed it in Section 9 of Article I, along with other restrictions on governmental actions to limit, most notably, executive action. The language is clear enough, but there is more. Go below the fold.
Something worth a look would be the Federalist Papers; quite likely the most under-utilized qualifier for all things 'constitutional.' The intent of the founders, and reasoning behind the most brilliant document ever crafted by man is easily accessible now-a-days and worth the read. Especially by those who would pretend to operate the legislative branch of our country constitutionally. Heritage continues:
In The Federalist No. 58, James Madison described the centrality of the power of the purse's role in the growth of representative government and its particular importance in the Constitution's governmental structure: And the [legislature] has, and must have, a controlling influence over the executive power, since it holds at its own command all the resources by which a chief magistrate could make himself formidable. It possesses the power over the purse of the nation and the property of the people. It can grant or withhold supplies; it can levy or withdraw taxes; it can unnerve the power of the sword by striking down the arm that wields it. In short Dr. Benishek, the president, without the Congressional ability to expend resources for his own devices cannot use those resources to subvert the constitution. If you don't hand the weapons to him he cannot use them. The president cannot expend resources if congress does not allow it. No agency exists under our structure that forces your hand. The Supreme court cannot compel the congress to release funds for previously authorized expenditures. Indeed, the power of the the purse has been available to this congress, and it has not yet been exercised. Your declaration of powerlessness was incorrect. And the next time you want to explain how it works to me, perhaps you bring fluffy mittens. I bruise easily.
The Power Of The Purse | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
The Power Of The Purse | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 hidden)
|