NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
Forgetting The MessageBy JGillman, Section News
Folks concerned about the sniping from within the Republican camp need to look at their candidates a little more closely from now on.
First off, any conservative who thinks that we should do anything else but vote for Pete Hoekstra, and Mitt Romney is off their nut. There are absolutely differences between those two and their opponents. The damage brought about by twelve years of Debbie Stabenow type thinking in the US Senate, and a mere three and a half years of Barack Obama as commander in chief is Awesome. And not in a good way. Their mindset and ideals are incompatible with a Republican form of government guaranteed by Article 4, Section 4 of our constitution. Incompatible with a country ruled by law, not men. Today's paper highlighted however, the unfortunate condition of our candidates vying for those positions of such importance; President, US Senator, and Michigan Supreme Court. With the carefully placed articles in the local papers, we have a problem. Articles about how Romney is failing to Obama in 'key' states, and George Weeks inflating Pete Hoekstra's record so he could pop it like a balloon, to a Lessenberry column 'introducing' Bridget Mary McCormack's message to a state that doesn't know who she is: "Nor is she a traditional candidate. Most Supreme Court nominees have been former senators, governors, or appellate and circuit court judges. McCormack is a popular law professor at the University of Michigan and director of the school's legal clinics.Excuse me while I take over the cat's duties of leaving partially digested food on the floor for a moment. Not much of a soft sell eh? Never mind the fact that the left is would up like a nine day clock in support of her candidacy. she is ALL Hollywood folks. In fact they have already put out a viral video where the former cast of an NBC show (West Wing) is actually referring to McCormack as "Hot". By golly! If that is the best qualification for the Michigan Supreme Court? Then rule-of-law be damned. Stake out the local "Toddlers & Tiaras" competitions for the next generations of our top legal referees! Continued below the fold
"Hotness" in a candidate.
Her opponents of course, are simply bland, rule of law, "administrative types" who don't have Hollywood paying the campaign bill. How might they sell that 'normal-ness' to a population that is too dumbed down to accept a simply 'normal' judiciary? Its tough. Stephen Markman should easily win because his rulings do send a message consistent with rule of law. And add to this he has incumbency which is stated on the ballot. (For folks who DON'T know, that matters) The others? Colleen O'Brien is a new face to many voters for the court, nominated at the MI GOP convention this month. She will have to sell a message. One that is sufficiently ROL, but also loud enough to get over the cacophony of 'hotness' messages of the celebrity endorsed Bridget. But the Michigan Supreme Court race, as always, will play second fiddle to the other important messaging contests for the US Presidency and Senate. And as always going the middle of the road route always leaves us at this point. WE KNOW Mitt Romney is the better choice. There is no question about it. But when the fence sitting middle folks who have not an ounce of ideology or consideration for cause and effect cast their ballots, they look at the words, and deeds as told by the media types. Even the article for MiSC candidate McCormack referenced above is told a certain way. When the message is not sufficiently clear, the press can fit it to their desired agenda or meme. Though not the same, Romneycare becomes Obamacare, Dogs on rooftops are worse than dogs eaten, government cronyism in Olympics is the same as government cronyism with industry (General Motors) in an Olympic fashion. Likewise with Pete Hoekstra. How hard can the former congressman sell free markets, limited intrusion into private enterprise, and supporting Republican form of government when he has been less than true to those ideals. There is no question in our minds that Debbie Stabenow is likely the worst US Senator we have ever had. Particularly as it relates to her performance and ownership of the loss of manufacturing due to public policy changes while she has served. But George Weeks calls it absolutely absurd, and asks "By what standard", with regard to the campaign paid page http://worstsenator.com. And the contrast will unfortunately, for those independents hoping to be convinced, have to be enhanced. Again. Hands down, Hoekstra is the better of the two candidates when it comes to who would be a better US senator, but it is unfortunately a more 'nuanced' set of reasons that have to be used. It doesn't have to always be this way. If our Republican office holders would actually govern by Republican principles without fail, Republicans (and the rest of the population) would win every time. Its the mixed messaging and inability to hold to principle when tasked, that has put these top contenders into questionable status, and where the whim of coverage by media can paint them as anything. In this world of 30 second attention spans, black and white differences explain themselves and convince more effectively.
Forgetting The Message | 9 comments (9 topical, 0 hidden)
Forgetting The Message | 9 comments (9 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Related Links+ 'introducing' Bridget Mary McCormack's message+ http://wor stsenator.com + Also by JGillman |