NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
That's Saul Folks . . . He Still Hasn't LearnedBy Kevin Rex Heine, Section News
You would think that, after the mudhole he had stomped into his keister back at the May state convention, lame-duck National Committeeman Saul Anuzis would understand that we the people are a tad more aware of what's going on politically in our state, especially with regard to stealth initiatives aimed at permanently undermining either our individual liberties, or our constitutional protections against government overreach. Unfortunately, you'd be wrong.
You might then think that I'm referring to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which Saul has subtly pushed on his blogsite at least four times since the May state convention; either suggesting the possibility of one candidate (perhaps Romney) winning the popular presidential vote while the other (perhaps Obama) wins the Electoral College, or suggesting the possibility of an Electoral College tie. Never-you-mind the reality that, according to Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight, the statistical likelihood of the former is currently either 2.0% or 3.2% (depending on which way the inconsistency breaks), and of the latter is currently 0.3%. You'd be wrong there, too. No, Saul has a whole other trick up his sleeve this time around, and a whole different progressive cause that he's advocating for.
As Jason pointed out last week, the Michigan Renewable Energy Amendment is, as of August 15th, one of three proposals (out of an apparent initial pool of 24) that will be on the Michigan ballot this fall, with the fate of four others still undecided. Chief, I think, among the unique elements of this proposal is that no other state (including the green-turds of California) is going to the extreme of attempting to ensconce a renewable portfolio standard into the state constitution. And that's on top of all the practical problems with this proposal:
Another brutal reality is that "green" energy sources, almost by definition, are going to be "baseline" in nature, in that they cannot be started up as necessary to meet peak demand, nor quickly and safely powered down when the demand ebbs. Further, I have yet to see any verifiable data showing that solar and wind are capable of meeting the "five nines" standard of power grid reliability. That last point may require some clarification. 99.999% reliability (hence the term "five nines") is an industry standard common to utility grids and telecommunication networks (including IT networks). In practical terms, this translates to sufficient durability and redundancy to ensure an absolute maximum of five minutes of unplanned downtime per year, averaged across the entire grid in question. Everything I've ever seen with regard to solar and wind caps their reliability at a mere 25% . . . not even close to the industry standard, even with what would be considered adequate redundancy for any other type of power generation source. Solar power, apparently the holy grail of green energy advocates, is the most expensive to generate at 22 cents per kilowatt hour. The problem is that there is no reliable data on how much it actually costs to produce solar-generated electricity, so all of the cost estimates regarding solar power are for infrastructure construction only. And yet, in spite of the reality that "green" energy isn't all that it's made out to be, including mounting evidence from Europe that this is a bad idea, and including evidence that the projected economic advantages are being miscited, major players are apparently lining up to endorse this garbage. Prominent on the list of supporters is Sterling Corporation, a Republican communications company and consulting firm. For those of you familiar with playing political connect-the-dots in Michigan, it should be a given that, if Sterling decides that they're onboard with something, a certain lame-duck power player in Michigan Republican politics is likely to be close behind. It's not like we shouldn't have seen this coming. Those who actually pay attention to "That's Saul Folks!" may have noticed that on July 15th, July 22nd, July 29th, and August 5th (four consecutive Sundays immediately preceding the August primary), Saul Anuzis subtly laid out the case for Michigan embracing a rigid, legislatively inflexible, prohibitively expensive energy production standard as an effectively-permanent change to the state's constitution. Not surprisingly, he cited a Think Progress poll and a collection of Ivory Tower op-ed pieces as evidence that MERA is a good idea. So the press release from Michigan Energy Michigan Jobs last weekend, followed by an essay making the case for an "all of the above" approach to energy policy (from none other than the "former Michigan GOP Chair" himself), wasn't exactly unexpected. This has me curious as to whether the quarterly filings for Michigan Energy Michigan Jobs will have any contact financially with Sterling Corporation, Coast-to-Coast Strategies, or Saul Anuzis directly . . . just because I'm curious like that. However, while Mr. Anuzis seems to have plenty of Republican Establishment company with regard to his willingness to spend taxpayer dollars on Big Wind, his choice for the RNC nomination for POTUS apparently won't be on that list anytime soon. From the Des Moines Register:
Shawn McCoy, a spokesman for Romney's Iowa campaign, told The Des Moines Register, "He will allow the wind credit to expire, end the stimulus boondoggles, and create a level playing field on which all sources of energy can compete on their merits. Assuming that Mittens backs that talk up with action, life should start getting real "interesting" for the windbaggers sometime around January 20th of next year. Since it's not certain whether the wind-and-solar industry can survive without government subsidy assistance, and it seems that a Romney administration will be shutting that spigot off (as rightly should be done), I'm sorta curious as to why a self-proclaimed conservative leader is so damned interested in constitutionally mandating that which has no real business being in the constitution in the first place.
That's Saul Folks . . . He Still Hasn't Learned | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
That's Saul Folks . . . He Still Hasn't Learned | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Related Links+ according to Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight+ pointed out last week + Michigan Renewable Energy Amendment + out of an apparent initial pool of 24 + Consumers and Detroit Edison have each committed $2.9 million toward defeating this ballot proposal + objections + known facts + all of the cost estimates regarding solar power + mounting evidence from Europe that this is a bad idea + evidence that the projected economic advantages are being miscited + Sterling Corporation + if Sterling decides that they're onboard with something + July 15th + July 22nd + July 29th + August 5th + Think Progress poll + collection of Ivory Tower op-ed pieces + press release from Michigan Energy Michigan Jobs + essay making the case for an "all of the above" approach + plenty of Republican Establishment company + From the Des Moines Register + Also by Kevin Rex Heine |