Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Being a Judge Means Following the Law, No Matter How Distasteful


    By The Wizard of Laws, Section News
    Posted on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 02:27:27 PM EST
    Tags: Constitution, empathy, First Amendment, military, rule of law, Snyder v Phelps, Westboro (all tags)

    Cross-posted in The Wizard of Laws

    Last year's Michigan Supreme Court race featured a fairly clear choice between rule-of-law judges and empathy judges.  The former discern the law and apply it as they find it; the latter rule based on personal whim and feeling, contorting the law to fit their preordained results.  

    Sometimes, the rule of law is painful to watch, but it is in these moments when it is most needed.  Judges don't get to make only the easy calls; they have to make tough, occasionally excruciating decisions.  This is the situation that confronted the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Snyder v Phelps, the anxiosly awaited First Amendment case addressing picketing by the Westboro Baptist Church.  The Court issued its opinion today, available here.

    Here are the facts, from the case syllabus:

    For the past 20 years, the congregation of the Westboro Baptist Church has picketed military funerals to communicate its belief that God hates the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality, particularly in America's military. The church's picketing has also condemned the Catholic Church for scandals involving its clergy. Fred Phelps, who founded the church, and six Westboro Baptist parishioners (all relatives of Phelps) traveled to Maryland to picket the funeral of Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, who was killed in Iraq in the line of duty. The picketing took place on public land approximately 1,000 feet from the church where the funeral was held, in accordance with guidance from local law enforcement officers. The picketers peacefully displayed their signs--stating, e.g., "Thank God for Dead Soldiers," "Fags Doom Nations," "America is Doomed," "Priests Rape Boys," and "You're Going to Hell"--for about 30 minutes before the funeral began. Matthew Snyder's father (Snyder), petitioner here, saw the tops of the picketers' signs when driving to the funeral, but did not learn what was written on the signs until watching a news broadcast later that night.

    Snyder filed a diversity action against Phelps, his daughters--who participated in the picketing--and the church (collectively Westboro) alleging, as relevant here, state tort claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, intrusion upon seclusion, and civil conspiracy. A jury held Westboro liable for millions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages. Westboro challenged the verdict as grossly excessive and sought judgment as a matter of law on the ground that the First Amendment fully protected its speech. The District Court reduced the punitive damages award, but left the verdict otherwise intact. The Fourth Circuit reversed, concluding that Westboro's statements were entitled to First Amendment protection because those statements were on matters of public concern, were not provably false, and were expressed solely through hyperbolic rhetoric.

    Held: The First Amendment shields Westboro from tort liability for its picketing in this case.

    Can there be anything more distasteful and sickening than the hate-filled rants of these Westboro kooks?  Does the First Amendment really protect this bigotry and invective?

    No and yes, respectively.

    Legally, this turned out not to be even a close question -- the margin on the Court was 8-1, with only Justice Alito dissenting.  One has to concede admiration for Chief Justice Roberts, who authored the majority opinion and who, I am certain, wishes he had been able to lead a unanimous court in this important case.  Chief Justice Roberts concluded his opinion this way:

    Westboro believes that America is morally flawed; many Americans might feel the same about Westboro. Westboro's funeral picketing is certainly hurtful and its contribution to public discourse may be negligible. But Westboro addressed matters of public import on public property, in a peaceful manner, in full compliance with the guidance of local officials. The speech was indeed planned to coincide with Matthew Snyder's funeral, but did not itself disrupt that funeral, and Westboro's choice to conduct its picketing at that time and place did not alter the nature of its speech.

    Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and--as it did here--inflict great pain. On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker. As a Nation we have chosen a different course--to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate. That choice requires that we shield Westboro from tort liability for its picketing in this case.

    Undoubtedly, there will be many who decry this decision and call for, oh, something to be done.  But what?  Congress can pass a law making Westboro's conduct illegal, but such a law would itself be unconstitutional under the principles outlined in the Snyder decision.  

    The First Amendment makes blogging possible.  Yes, it protects flag burning and Nazi marches, but it also prohibits speech codes and attempts to muzzle a free press and the free expression of ideas that characterizes healthy political discourse.  

    The Snyder decision is not an endorsement of Westboro or its lamebrained antics; rather, it's a example of the majesty and breadth of the First Amendment and a reminder that the rule of law can be extremely difficult.  It is at these times, at the outer edges of freedom, that we must demonstrate our commitment to the Constitution and the exraordinary framework the Founders gave us.

    And we must thank God for the Constitution and pray for all the men and women in our military.  And while we're at it, let's pray for the misguided souls at Westboro, that God may touch their hearts and minds, showing them His way.

    < Wisconsin and the Feral Children of Tomorrow-morrow Land | Luckily, we in Michigan have Nostradumb@$$ in our midst >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    What can be done? (none / 0) (#1)
    by KG One on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 04:33:30 PM EST
    Well, when you have a group of losers that gets easily frightened off by a bunch of people dressed like comic book characters like they did at last year's Comic-Con, you know that they're not very dedicated to their cause and are only interested in publicity and hoping to hit the legal lottery.

    My two recommendations for the future would be to contact either the Patriot Guard Riders or Rolling Thunder to see if they are aware of an event that the Westboro "Church" wants to protest.

    Also, there is also nothing preventing anyone from arriving early to one of their protests, taking up all of the available parking and generally making it impossible for this "church" to do their thing.

    Or..... (none / 0) (#2)
    by grannynanny on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 07:36:02 PM EST
    doing what one enterprising community did.  When the Westboro protesters discovered that their vehicles all "experienced" sudden flat tires, all of the tire dealers and repair shops were "suddenly" closed for the day, week, month - at least when it came to fixing "those" tires.

    It seems an alert member of the community staked himself out and took license plate numbers of the Westboro protesters and spread the word to close the shops when they came in for repairs.

    Priceless!!!!  Where there is a will - there is a way.  

    And I agree with the Supreme Court ruling - Freedom of Speech - no matter how ugly - has to be upheld but there are ways to show our support for the rath that befalls our soldier/heros and their families when this disgusting group rears their ugly heads.  

    I cannot fathom (none / 0) (#3)
    by JGillman on Wed Mar 02, 2011 at 09:34:20 PM EST
    the conscience (or absence thereof) that allows someone to bring such hatred towards humanity.  Especially someone who claims to be a man of God.

    • An imam by RushLake, 03/03/2011 05:30:38 AM EST (none / 0)
    IMHO (none / 0) (#6)
    by TerranceH on Thu Mar 03, 2011 at 07:20:23 AM EST
    In my opinion, it's not the least bit unfortunate that the Fist Amendment protects cretins like Fred Phelps and his rather unbalanced followers. I applaud the decision!

    I detest Fred Phelps and his hateful rhetoric, but I will fight to insure he is allowed to say it.

    I'm curious, though: What the hell was Justice Alito thinking?

    Tough call on a tough case... (none / 0) (#11)
    by rdww on Fri Mar 04, 2011 at 10:12:51 AM EST
    ... but the right one.  The only problem here is that the court seems to have punted on the bigger First Amendment issues.  this would have been a great time to shoot down the extra-constitutional laws that have been invented to stifle pro-life demonstrators.


    what a bunch of crap (none / 0) (#12)
    by maidintheus on Fri Mar 04, 2011 at 10:35:36 AM EST
    I disagree with this ruling and Alito should be applauded! This should not have been allowed to present as a freedom of speech case. What the double toothpicks happened to 'your rights stop where mine begin'?
    This just supports bullies getting away with the murder of other's freedom. I'm tired of this wimp ass view of freedom! Freedom is a win, win. Sure, everyone should retain their right to say whatever BUT it shouldn't be allowed to interfere and disrupt a memorial procession. You know this aint right!  

    • The ONLY way by JGillman, 03/04/2011 11:14:28 AM EST (none / 0)
      • and... by Corinthian Scales, 03/04/2011 12:39:07 PM EST (none / 0)
    • Still by maidintheus, 03/05/2011 11:39:46 AM EST (none / 0)
    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search