One thing in the news article that stands out as a giant clerical OOPS:

"Lawmakers were puzzled by the second page of the summary, which listed "changes made pursuant to the Lt. Governor's office and their deal with Democrats in the Legislature."

Kowall said: "I've never seen anything like that before in all my tenure in the Legislature."

I'd be curious as to exactly what was in that memo.

More specifically, very generously paying for their houses, setting aside of jobs specifically for soon-to-be former residents, and something about additional benefits for families like health care/insurance.

That last one was not a typo, someone is telling the locals that they'll be getting bennies from the government for their support.

The end times must be near when I'm in agreement with Malik Shabazz and the Black Panthers.

Snyder says the bridge would be publicly owned but privately financed, built and managed.

Beyond this raising the question of: Does public ownership/private operation mean any losses are public, any profit private? (and I think the answer is, "yes"), I've seen this concept elsewhere, and Merriam-Webster has the definition.