Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Michiganders show up in force to defend life!


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Fri Jan 23, 2009 at 10:04:15 AM EST
    Tags: abortion, Cropsey, Gleason, Roe v Wade, Lansing, Michigan (all tags)

    Yesterday hundreds of Michiganders joined hundreds of thousands of their fellow Americans in a march on the Capitol in Washington, DC, coming together in one powerful voice to urge the President and lawmakers to protect the unborn.  

    Unfortunately, President Obama is expected to make true the worst fears of defenders of innocent life.  ABC News reports that he is today expected to sign an executive order overturning the Mexico City Policy, in effect permitting American tax dollars to be spent funding abortions around the world.  

    Abortion WILL become more frequent, today, with untold thousands of innocent lives snuffed out between this date and the reinstatement of the policy upon the election of a pro-life replacement in the White House.  Compounding the tragedy is the fact that you and I will be paying for the killings.  

    Simply put, elections have consequences.  We cannot, for a single moment, allow ourselves to be plied by sugar-coated speeches, popular sentiment and the adulation of the mainstream media.  How men and women who claim to be pro-life can justify their vote for this man in light of today's action... I just plain don't get it.

    As heartbreaking as today's executive order is, though, the testimony, conviction and commitment of the men and women and children who came together yesterday in DC is equally encouraging.  And they weren't alone.

    Yesterday hundreds gathered at the steps of the Capitol in Lansing, Michigan as well.  It was cold, it was windy and it was overcast... the meteorological equivalent of the political climate for life, but there wasn't an ounce of quit or loss of compassion in these families.

    Nearly a dozen legislators were in attendance... Representatives Rick Jones, Tom McMillin, Matt Lori... Democratic Senator John Gleason.  Senator Alan Cropsey spoke to the crowd, encouraging them to continue championing life and reminding everyone of the importance of the cause.  He cautioned that the new administration would likely attempt, soon, to overturn the global gag order and encouraged folks to press their Congressmen hard and frequently to influence the administration in the cause of life.  

    Today the President made Cropsey a prophet.  And now I can only wonder how Senator Gleason rationalizes his support of a man that helped enable the new slaughter of thousands of children across the globe.

    < Friday in the Sphere: January 23 | Commissar Carl Levin >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Mexico City Policy means more abortions, not less (none / 0) (#1)
    by Brady on Fri Jan 23, 2009 at 10:49:53 AM EST
    It's ironic that Obama's move to end the Mexico City policy is being held up as a sign of how pro-abortion he is.  The truth is that the Mexico City policy actually increases the number of abortions performed overseas, not less.

    The Mexico City policy cuts off USAID funding to foreign organizations that perform some abortions.  The theory behind the policy is that those organizations would stop providing abortions in order to retain this financial assistance from the U.S. government.  It was a good idea that failed miserably.

    Instead, most of these foreign organizations continue to provide abortions.  But the resulting elimination of USAID also cut off access to US supplies of condoms and other forms of birth control.  This has lead to a decrease in contraceptive use and an increase in the rates of unintended pregnancies and abortion.  It also has led to a decrease in the ability of these organizations to provide sex education which has also resulted in an increase in unplanned pregnancies and abortions.

    And on top of that, there are so many loopholes in the Mexico City policy, that a number of organziations continued to provide abortions even while the policy was in effect.  For more information on this, please visit:  http://covenantnews.com/bortvote.htm

    The Mexico City policy is one that sounds good in a political stump speech and is used for partisan political purposes, but it is effectively a pro-abortion policy, not a pro-Life policy.

    A prime example of Ronald Reagan's quote that "Governments tend not to solve problems, only to rearrange them," would be the Mexico City policy he instituted.

    By eliminating the pro-abortion Mexico City policy, Obama has made good early on his pledge to provide smart government, rather than more government or less government.

    "On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.  We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things."

    One goal, two approaches (none / 0) (#4)
    by Brady on Fri Jan 23, 2009 at 12:28:55 PM EST
    Nick, you and I have a common belief on this issue and a common goal, to prevent as many abortions as possible.  However our approach to this issue is very different.  While your approach is to prevent abortions by attempting to make abortion illegal, my approach is to prevent abortions by reducing the number of unplanned pregnancies.

    Your approach works very well as a partisan wedge issue to turn out voters.  But, after 36 years of us trying that approach, we are no closer to overturning Roe v. Wade or making abortion illegal in any country in which we supply aid dollars to.

    My approach is post-partisan.  Thankfully, there are many conservatives, libertarians, Libertarians and Republicans who understand the social and fiscal wisdom of limiting unplanned pregnancies in the first place.

    I'm suspecting there is something deeper here that is not being put forward.  Are you opposed to contraception and comprehensive sex education?

    • Bologna by Nick, 01/23/2009 01:18:14 PM EST (none / 0)
    • Perhaps, by quigonjames, 01/23/2009 07:46:59 PM EST (none / 0)
    • limiting unplanned pregnancies by Crippy, 01/24/2009 01:52:01 AM EST (none / 0)
    • Also by Crippy, 01/24/2009 01:56:05 AM EST (none / 0)
    You must support abortion to oppose abortion? (none / 0) (#9)
    by Theblogprof on Mon Jan 26, 2009 at 01:24:03 PM EST
    I'm not feeling Brady's argument.  Keep abortion legal to make abortion more rare?  I mean hey - you can't have the day without the night, right?  No good if not for evil?  Where have I heard this before.  Oh yes - here it is:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX2H3ArHXN8

    Trying to reduce unintended pregnancies is commendable, but it will never be too limited.  It will always happen, and not in small numbers.  Because a pregnancy is unintended has nothing to do with the 'right' to kill that unintended baby.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search