Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Bart Stupak: Blacks must work for peanuts, whites get free cash from Congress (and other inanity)


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 07:12:37 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    With the State's unemployment rate stuck at 7.2% and Democrats in Congress like Sander Levin trying to strip funding for our troops to pay unemployed workers to sit around the house for an extra thirteen weeks you'd think Congressman Bart Stupak might relish the opportunity to boost actual employment in his home district.  Alas, he's fighting instead to round up a whole slew of new work visas to continue giving Michigan jobs to folks from other countries.

    One of a rash of recent decisions by Michigan Democrats that seem to fly directly in the face of decades worth of established lefty thinking.  Only a couple of days from 4/20 it makes a brother wonder... what are they smoking over at MDP and did they get into the good stuff early?

    The Stupak about-face is maybe the most confounding.  We've got the highest unemployment rate in the nation.  We're one of only two states over 6% for crying out loud.  And he's actively fighting in Congress to help businesses avoid hiring Michigan residents?  

    At issue are the work visas of hundreds of employees of the Grand Hotel on Mackinac Island.  There used to be a federal loophole where aliens who'd worked here in the past didn't count against the federal cap on work visas but the Dem Congress let that expire last year.  Now Bart wants a do-over.  

    The Ivory Tower reports:

    In prepared testimony to the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Musser said the Grand Hotel tries to recruit Americans to work at the hotel, but they aren't available on a seasonal basis. The immigrant workers, he said, "are the lifeblood of our seasonal business."

    "Our workforce during the summer is made up of approximately 600 employees -- 250 American citizens and 350 or so H2B workers," he said. "Our American jobs depend on our H2B workers..."

    Said AFL-CIO President John Sweeney: "Until this program undergoes major reform -- such as a more transparent recruitment process, a meaningful way for workers to enforce promises made to them by employers, access to legal services and receive fair prevailing wages -- Congress should not vote to extend or expand any exemptions."

    So the union doesn't like Stupak's idea either.

    Those of you fortunate enough to have never stepped foot in the Grand Hotel don't know what you're missing and that's a good thing.  I don't mean to speak ill of a "primo" Michigan tourist destination but the whole plantation-chic thing never really worked for me.  The place goes out of it's way to convince you you're hanging out in the 1830s on a cotton farm and you couldn't do that if you had to hire native yoopers.  Their skin just isn't dark enough.

    But let's ignore (if we can) the overwhelming institutional racism of the place and the way everyone turns a blind eye and pretends they're clueless about their little adventure in role-playing.  We've got a 7.2% unemployment rate.  The Dems are talking about giving folks 13 more weeks of unemployment benefits.  The Grand Hotel needs seasonal help for the summer.  Hundreds of jobs.

    I suppose I could be wrong, but I think that's what the kids these days are calling "an opportunity."

    Instead of doing the right thing, Stupak's doing the politically opportune thing.  He's protecting the only place in Michigan where everyone who isn't a Caucasian is forced to dress like a lawn jockey, working for peanuts so that he can give the white folks sitting at home on their fat backsides a fatter check for doing nothing.  

    Lefty logic, apparently.  Hey, I don't get it either.  I'm just telling you about it.  And, sadly, the insanity is contagious.  It struck the Michigan House yesterday as a panel officially moved the first part of Andy Dillon's big energy plan to the floor of the chamber where action could come today.

    Read on...

    This is the bill that grants DTE and Consumers Energy a monopoly in Michigan, kills competition, dramatically drives up rates, drives smaller suppliers out of business and immediately dries up billions in potential free-market investment in alternative energy for a "promise" that the Big 2 will TRY to do that job themselves.  The Associated Press reports:

    The bill also would change how rates are raised and help utilities recover some financing expenses from customers during the construction of new multibillion-dollar power plants.

    And it would ensure all customers pay the actual cost of the electricity they receive. Rates historically have been "skewed" by regulators so residential customers pay less than actual costs while business customers pay more. About $350 million would be shifted from the bills of companies, universities and others to residential customers over five years under the measure.

    Well that sounds like one heck of a good deal, doesn't it?  Our rates are going to go up period.  They're going to go up more since they're shifting costs onto the backs of Michigan families.  They'll go up MORE once the Dems pass their alternative energy package that taxes moms and dads $8 BILLION over the next twenty years.  And all so that Big Energy will TRY to increase alternative energy production?  No mandates.  No benchmarks.  No guarantees.  Just a fat payday for the new monopolies.  

    Remember when the Democrat party used to at least PRETEND be all about defending the little guy?  So much for that.

    Even sadder, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce joined the lefties yesterday at a presser pushing this inane legislation and the hidden tax hike that goes along with it.  I think that miiiiight have something to do with the fact that Consumers and DTE are pretty big power players in the business community but hey, what do I know?  I'm sure the whole cost-shift away from businesses and directly onto consumers helped too.

    But that's not to say everyone's lost their minds.  The AARP, the Catholic Conference and the Grand Rapids Chamber among others continue to rightly oppose this death-blow to the free market.  

    And as the Dems look to expand their personal power on the backs of the unemployed and those already struggling with skyrocketing energy bills a record number of folks are lining up at the trough to get a taste of that power for themselves.  The Detroit News reports this morning that a record number of folks want to represent Michigan at the Dems' national convention in Denver.  Only one small problem... that job, "technically, doesn't exist."

    ...Around 600 -- will compete on Saturday for the honor at 15 congressional district conventions around the state. Eighty-three will be selected: 47 by groups of Hillary Clinton supporters and 36 from among formally uncommitted activists who will mostly back Barack Obama.

    They're part of the 156-member Michigan delegation that as of today is still banned from this summer's convention in Denver. Despite the ban, state chairman Mark Brewer said he's confident the delegates elected Saturday will be seated.

    They've been saying that for months now.  Literally.  And they continue to tell us that they're just waiting for Hillary and Barack to formally agree on the plan that will seat our delegates.  That's all that's standing in the way.  And yet somehow nothing's getting done.  

    At some point regional pride's going to kick in, right?  Please?

    < Enough is Enough: Governor Granholm Should Repent or Face Ex-Communication from the Catholic Church | Thursday in the Sphere, April 17 >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Is it me? (none / 0) (#1)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02:48 PM EST
    Surely, nothing can be this confusing unless one sets out to make it so.  I have whip lash from trying to keep up with what they're saying. "I voted this way but I didn't mean to (Obama is a hoot!), I said this but I meant that, I'm against carrying guns but I'm all for clinging to them, I am for freedom except in America.

    "The bill also would change how rates are raised and help utilities recover some financing expenses from customers during the construction of new multibillion-dollar power plants." What the...!! I thought they were against companies making money. Aside from the obvious monopoly, why would a "capital" gain be allowed by anyone?  Perhaps this is their way of saying, "Help! I'm a compulsive hypocrite and cannot control myself!" And what's with the "actual cost" statement? That's referencing something that doesn't exist. Perhaps that was a joke meant to be phunny .Also threatening that others will do what they (look freakin' around you!) have already done:If you don't agree "you are painting a bleak and a poor future for our state because we won't have the jobs..."


    Let's ignore if unpopular or proven doable. (none / 0) (#2)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 12:09:15 PM EST
    It's seems certain things are popular. Like ignoring facts. So, lets ignore that when the gas powered engine became more widely used it contributed to unemployment. Lets ignore the many things that contribute to unemployment! Let's ignore the fact that unemployment, at this time, is a world wide problem...not just an American problem. And by all means let's ignore what will actually be a wise approach to an over simplified issue. And lets ignore that it certainly takes more then a bunch of wimps, sucking hind teat at the breast of government programs, to successfully make it through.

    Yeah, lets ignore success, too!  I know a sure way to create lots of work, let's outlaw the automobile and make everyone use a horse for everything, no nasty engines or fossil fuel.  We could all be equal and equally busy trying to keep up.

    Wow! Dang! With these ideas I could raise money and run for president...nah, that's something I know can actually be done.  

    Stuff that's popular. (none / 0) (#3)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 12:15:20 PM EST
    Let's instead look at it through the race card thingy. That being so popular and all. Perhaps we can even get lucky and find that miracle program that will cause total reception of policies that have always, in the history of the world, miserably failed.  

    Plantation-chic: (lawn jockey's don't dress like that anymore) They are obvious in their choice of underwear, chains in their pockets, skull caps, tattoo required, everything baggy so they can "cling" to their gun, and they turn to religion via Rev. Wright type pastors without a trace of "bitterness", and are more adept at follow the leader then follow the law. I wonder what's with the lack of attention to the "school to work" programs.

    Perhaps the more unemployment we have the more obvious it is that these government programs don't work.  

    Yeah, "work" is a funny word.  Perhaps it has nothing to do with a job and getting reimbursed by an employer for ones efforts... I be workin' that street gansta theme...


    squirrels always go for the program (none / 0) (#4)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 12:21:51 PM EST
    It's all about da programs, see.  These here union folk do agree with Bart Stupid and this is their convoluted way of attaching more benefits unto these worker programs for the lawn jockeys and "guests."  Just watch, this will be the next step.  

    What these "I need help, You owe me, Offer me a program, only bitter criminals should be allowed to benefit from the II Amendment" people (selfishly look only at what I want now) don't realize is this is how you trap rodents.  If I offer a rodent something it really wants/needs it will blindly go for it and I have accomplished rendering it defenseless.

    And then they will not be spared. The "squirrels" certainly won't be given the benefit of the II Amendment anymore.  Just as a terrorist will not spare a fellow Muslim, when one is defenselessly dependant on a bunch of programs one can put a knife to their neck and throw them into the ovens or make slaves of.  

    Who will they blame this time for not looking at this "follow the leader" problem?      


    Talk about being on a role! (none / 0) (#5)
    by Nick on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 12:50:29 PM EST
    That's awesome.

    Some good points, Nick, but... (none / 0) (#6)
    by rdww on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 02:55:07 PM EST
    ... it sounds like you got some really bad room service at the Grand Hotel and are still PO'ed at them.

    Okay, let's go over Econ 101 here... (none / 0) (#8)
    by KG One on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 06:47:57 PM EST
    ...'cuz apparently the people on Mackinac Island (and Rep. stupak) need a refresher big time.

    The "Americans(/locals) aren't willing to do the work" argument is missing one key phrase: for what the market will bear.

    The workers are there, they just don't care for what's being offered.

    We have immigration laws for a reason. We don't need to waive them every time some Tom, Dick and Harry come along complaining that the cost of things are going up.

    The businesses will need to understand this simple fact and adapt.


    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search