Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Talk about a conflict of interest!


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 01:18:16 PM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    I'm not much of a pro-basketball guy.  If I'm laying around the house at night and the Pistons are on I might have the game on in the background while I'm on the web or cleaning up but it's not must-see TV.  I'm much more a hockey fan.  I love the game.  If I can make the time and a game's on the tube the Red Wings become the center of attention at the De Leeuw household.  

    So there wasn't much of a contest this past Friday when the Wings started their game at Calgary in the middle of the Piston's home tilt with the Bucks.  The channel changed.  But that doesn't mean I don't care.  I'm a sports guy and I'm a Detroit sports guy (other than the NFL... go Broncos!) so I was curious enough to flip back to the Stones during first intermission.  And when I did I couldn't believe what I saw.

    There was Democrat State Representative Barbara Farrah standing at half-court wearing a brightly colored  t-shirt jumping up an down like she'd just won the lottery. Which, I found out a moment later, was appropriate.  Because she had. To the tune of $2 million.

    The current chair of the House Regulatory Reform Committee, one of the committees most commonly associated with legislative matters regarding the Michigan Lottery (and a committee that has already dealt with thirteen pieces of gambling related legislation this term), had just accepted a $2 million pay out from an organization with regular business before her committee.

    I watched in a state of still semi-disbelief as she was interviewed by the venerable Piston's TV and radio announcer George Blaha. Apparently oblivious to the fact that he had one of the State's 150ish most powerful elected officials sitting next to him he asked "Barb" all sorts of questions about the experience.  The best was the last.  

    Blaha: Have you ever won anything before?

    Farrah: ...(pause)...(pause)...(smile)...'Nothing like this!'

    Hey, I get it.  How could three big wins in an only marginally Democrat seat compare to two million dollars?  I don't think there's a person reading this who wouldn't trade six years in Lansing for a couple million bucks!  But that's neither here nor there. Farrah's "prize" raises two suddenly pressing questions:

    Read on...

    1)    Was the drawing above the board?

    And

    2)    Does Farrah have a conflict of interest in accepting a $2 million pay out from an organization with frequent business before her committee?

    Let's start with question number one.  I'm not saying the fix was in... but...

    I gave the Michigan Lottery a quick telephone call to ask about the rules for this particular drawing.  Farrah was one of eight-hundred some odd $1,000 winners via any of the State's $20 instant games.  Completely random.  No sweat.  

    The next step was a privately held drawing at Michigan Lottery headquarters where the five finalists were determined.  According to their central office that particular drawing is held in Lansing by the "Drawing Manager" and is not recorded or broadcast but is "independently audited."

    If there were any shenanigans this is where they'd have happened.  But let's not lose our minds.  We aren't talking about Al Gore's recount magicians eight years ago or Chicago in the 60s.  I'm sure the drawing manager and the auditors are pretty darn close to being above reproach.  But have stranger things happened?  Sure.  

    The final step in the drawing was held live in front of thousands of screaming Pistons fans.  No problems there.

    Farrah won.  Probably fair and square.  But that brings us to question number two and the answer is unequivocally YES.  There's one whale-sized conflict of interest here.

    State Representative Barb Farrah chairs a committee that regularly deals with the Michigan Lottery.  The Michigan Lottery just cut her a check for $2 million.  Think that'll make a difference the next time lotto business comes before her committee for a hearing or to her desk for a vote?  There are two million reasons the answer is yes.  

    The Lotto itself takes steps to avoid this sort of conflict of interest.  The official rules of the lottery state, in part:

    R 432.2   Employees and contractors.

    Rule 2. An officer or  employee  of  the  bureau  and  any  spouse,  child, brother, sister, or parent residing as a member of the same household in  the principal place of abode of an officer or employee of the  bureau  shall  not  have any interest, direct or indirect, in dealing in the lottery  or in  the ownership or leasing of any property or premises used by or for the lottery.

    No one even remotely affiliated with the operations of the lottery is allowed to have anything to do with the drawings, the contests or the cash.  While a Committee Chair responsible for the lottery's operation is not specifically described by law as an "officer or an employee of the bureau" is there any doubt that the same concerns that lead to "Rule 2" apply here equally, if not to a greater extent?

    Barb Farrah won $2 million from the Michigan Lottery.  Good for her.  She told the Detroit News last week that it'd be nice to win since she doesn't have a job lined up after her time in Lansing is over.  Now she'll retire in comfort.  

    But as long as she's in Lansing and keeps that cash she has no business chairing a committee overseeing the organization that just cut her that monster sized check. She should resign her chairmanship immediately, promise to permanently recuse herself from any and all gambling related votes and hearings or just plain give back the money.  Since the cash makes her so happy it shouldn't be a tough decision.

    < The Obama Cult and Plantation Politics by Akindele Akinyemi | Governor Jennifer Granholm Supports Child Abuse By Denying Parental Alienation Awareness Day >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Shouldn't (none / 0) (#1)
    by tenex22 on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 03:31:15 PM EST
    I think is the key word. She Shouldn't be able to keep both. Stranger things happen every day in Lansing...

    What are the chances? (none / 0) (#2)
    by wctaxpayer on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 03:50:07 PM EST
    I don't think she should resign from the committee. I think she should give the money back to the state. Then, I would believe she help to increase out taxes because the state needed the money. Or, She could resign. That would be good as well.
    Rose Bogaert, Chair Wayne County Taxpayers Association, Inc.
    appearances (none / 0) (#3)
    by leondrolet on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 06:46:44 PM EST
    There is a reason that lottery employees are prohibited from winning the lottery: to prevent the appearance of impropriety.

    That is why lawmakers who are in charge of lottery issues in Lansing should face the same prohibition from winning. Especially when the drawing to determine the five finalists is non-public.

    Do I believe that Rep. Farrah did anything improper? No, I don't. Might some members of the public be suspicious? Probably.

    That is why I have asked Attorney General Mike Cox to review the non-public drawing that occurred in the lottery building. The public deserves assurances when a coincidence like this occurs.

    Rdww... that'd fly in the regressisphere (none / 0) (#4)
    by Nick on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 08:47:41 PM EST
    but not here.  Keep it above the board, chief. :)

    Upside (none / 0) (#5)
    by TheCurrentPodcast on Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 09:38:35 PM EST
    There is one upside to this...

    after she sees the taxes on that $2 mil she may just switch to the other side of the aisle.

    --jacob
    thecurrentpodcast.com

    This tops it! (none / 0) (#6)
    by NoviDemocrat on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 06:15:50 AM EST
    Of all the phony controversies that Nick has dragged across this blog, I think this tops them all. With ZERO proof that anyone has done anything illegal, Nick insinuates that there MAY be something illegal about the Representative's win. When he says:

    "Farrah won.  Probably fair and square."

    The implication is that maybe she didn't win fair and square and that someone or somebodies did something illegal to rig the game so that the Representative would win. Nick smears everyone involved in the process and based on what? Where's your proof that anyone involved in that game did anything to justify your sleazy little comment of "Probably". You've got nothing and you're little game of sleaze is disgusting.

    C'mon now boys and girls... (none / 0) (#8)
    by Nick on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 08:05:34 AM EST
    Better behavior.  Lets not pick on the woman's appearance.  That's how the other side behaves.  We're better than that.  

    This story has been making the rounds... (none / 0) (#9)
    by KG One on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 08:33:03 AM EST
    ...quite a bit on the local media this am.

    Surprisingly, aside from the usual "I'll be paying some bills and investing the rest", there has been no comment from the good representative on what else she'll do.

    The local meat puppets haven't gotten around to asking her directly about the points mentioned above.

    Sadly given the state of "journalism" today, I highly doubt that they will.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search