Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Dillon Vs. Dillon: "...a good chance to deceive."


    By leondrolet, Section News
    Posted on Mon Oct 27, 2008 at 04:22:57 PM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    "It is my belief that nearly any invented quotation, played with confidence, stands a good chance to deceive." - Mark Twain

    Michigan House Speaker Andy Dillon surely subscribes to the "big lie" theory; if you're gonna lie, lie BIG! That's exactly what Andy does in the fourth flier attacking his opponents recently mailed by the MI Democratic Party. In the upper right-hand corner, the flier claims that Dillon's recallers are, "spreading lies to protect the status quo in Lansing."

    Imagine, Dillon wants voters to believe that HE, the Speaker of the House and proponent of the biggest tax hike in state history, is fighting against Lansing and that those seeking to recall him are somehow out to protect Lansing's political establishment.

    It gets more outrageous. Check out this quote is from a pro-Dillon flier left at doors in Redford:

    "Andy Dillon knows that cutting taxes for residents and businesses will help get Michigan's economy back on the right track. Dillon voted to cut taxes 90 times for both businesses and residents - totaling $1.5 billion."

    What!!! Now Dillon, Granholm and Lansing cut taxes $1.5 billion instead of raising them $1.9 billion? Are voters that ignorant? We'll find out in about one week.

    In case you missed it, check out the front page story about the Dillon recall in today's Detroit Free Press here: http://www.freep.com/article/20081027/NEWS15/810270339.

    Finally, don't forget to let me know via email if you can help with any volunteer time this upcoming weekend or on election day in Redford?Dearborn Heights. We need you!

    I'll keep you posted!

    Leon Drolet
    www.mitaxpayers.org

    < October Surprise | Thank God: Decisive action saves Michigan >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Dillon and Unconstitutional HJR-NN Discharge? (none / 0) (#1)
    by DougDante on Wed Oct 29, 2008 at 03:05:32 AM EST
    Dillon and Unconstitutional HJR-NN Discharge?

    As Speaker of the House, Rep. Dillon was almost certainly aware of or involved in the unconstitutional handling of Rep. Stahl's motion to discharge HJR-NN, a joint resolution to put before the voters a parent's rights amendment.

    Rather than putting the motion before the entire House, as required by the Michigan Constitution, Dillon allowed the Judiciary committee to kill Representative Stahl's motion to discharge HJR-NN, violating both Michigan's Constitution and Michigan House Rules.

    " Rep. Stahl moved that the Committee on Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of House Joint Resolution NN."

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2007-2008/Journal/House/htm/2008-HJ-09-09-072.htm

    Michigan's constitution, covering motions to discharge from committee, reads in part:

    "Each house, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, shall choose its own officers and determine the rules of its proceedings, but shall not adopt any rule that will prevent a majority of the members elected thereto and serving therein from discharging a committee from the further consideration of any measure ..."

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-Article-IV-16

    Michigan House Rules are constitutionally appropriate, providing under Rule 42 for a vote to discharge among "a majority of the Members elected to and serving in the House":

    "(3)     Nothing in these rules shall prevent a majority of the Members elected to and
    serving in the House from discharging a committee from further consideration of any measure.
    (See Const 1963, Art 4 § 16) A notice of one session day shall be given of a motion to
    discharge any such committee, the notice to be in writing and entered upon the House Journal. If
    a committee of the House is discharged from further consideration of a bill, the bill shall be
    placed on the order of Second Reading."

    And further for motions to discharge must be handled each session under Rule 58:

    "Always in Order; Not Debatable.
          Rule 58. (1) The following motions are not debatable:
          (a)    Adjourn;
          (b)    Call of the House;
          .....
          (b)    Discharge a committee;
          ...."

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/publications/rules/house_rules.pdf

    Yet the only responsive action was a vote in the committee that is being discharged to postpone action within that committee itself for one day.

    "9/9/2008    HJ 72 Pg. 2115    motion to discharge committee postponed for day"

    http://www.legislature.mi.gov/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2008-HJR-NN

    The vote on the motion to discharge within the Judiciary Committee itself was irrelevant to the motion to discharge, and it violated both Michigan House Rules and Michigan's Constitution.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search