Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise with Right Michigan
      Advertise on RightMichigan.com


      NEWS TIPS!

      Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


      RightMichigan.com

      Buzz

      Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

      Raise the curtain.

      Display: Sort:
      Dillon and Unconstitutional HJR-NN Discharge? (none / 0) (#1)
      by DougDante on Wed Oct 29, 2008 at 03:05:32 AM EST
      Dillon and Unconstitutional HJR-NN Discharge?

      As Speaker of the House, Rep. Dillon was almost certainly aware of or involved in the unconstitutional handling of Rep. Stahl's motion to discharge HJR-NN, a joint resolution to put before the voters a parent's rights amendment.

      Rather than putting the motion before the entire House, as required by the Michigan Constitution, Dillon allowed the Judiciary committee to kill Representative Stahl's motion to discharge HJR-NN, violating both Michigan's Constitution and Michigan House Rules.

      " Rep. Stahl moved that the Committee on Judiciary be discharged from further consideration of House Joint Resolution NN."

      http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2007-2008/Journal/House/htm/2008-HJ-09-09-072.htm

      Michigan's constitution, covering motions to discharge from committee, reads in part:

      "Each house, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, shall choose its own officers and determine the rules of its proceedings, but shall not adopt any rule that will prevent a majority of the members elected thereto and serving therein from discharging a committee from the further consideration of any measure ..."

      http://www.legislature.mi.gov/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-Article-IV-16

      Michigan House Rules are constitutionally appropriate, providing under Rule 42 for a vote to discharge among "a majority of the Members elected to and serving in the House":

      "(3)     Nothing in these rules shall prevent a majority of the Members elected to and
      serving in the House from discharging a committee from further consideration of any measure.
      (See Const 1963, Art 4 § 16) A notice of one session day shall be given of a motion to
      discharge any such committee, the notice to be in writing and entered upon the House Journal. If
      a committee of the House is discharged from further consideration of a bill, the bill shall be
      placed on the order of Second Reading."

      And further for motions to discharge must be handled each session under Rule 58:

      "Always in Order; Not Debatable.
            Rule 58. (1) The following motions are not debatable:
            (a)    Adjourn;
            (b)    Call of the House;
            .....
            (b)    Discharge a committee;
            ...."

      http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/publications/rules/house_rules.pdf

      Yet the only responsive action was a vote in the committee that is being discharged to postpone action within that committee itself for one day.

      "9/9/2008    HJ 72 Pg. 2115    motion to discharge committee postponed for day"

      http://www.legislature.mi.gov/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=2008-HJR-NN

      The vote on the motion to discharge within the Judiciary Committee itself was irrelevant to the motion to discharge, and it violated both Michigan House Rules and Michigan's Constitution.

      Display: Sort:
      adzerk tracking image

      Login

      Make a new account

      Username:
      Password:
      Tweet along with RightMichigan by
      following us on Twitter HERE!
      create account | faq | search