Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Good news and bad news on Michigan's economy, which is at least a step in the right direction


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 06:54:28 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    Here's a nice change of pace for you.  Yesterday was actually a mixed bag for Michigan on the economic news front!  Yep, there was the daily dose of bad news but there was some potentially encouraging news mixed in too.  Now, it's nothing earth shattering, nothing that you'd normally go ga-ga over but these days I'll take what I can get.

    The good news comes out of the UAW of all places where four Michigan Chrysler plants voted yesterday on ratification of the recently bargained contract.  Going into the Locals votes the pact's opponents had an edge with more voting against the plan than in favor of it raising the specter of another strike or worse.

    There was (and is) a feeling throughout much of the union that Ron Gettelfinger hadn't delivered all that he could have throughout the bargaining process and that the proposed contract sold the union down the river.  That particular feeling seems to be especially pervasive outside of Michigan where the majority of the "no" votes have taken place.  Here in the Wolverine state it seems even union workers are just thankful to have a job.

    Read on...

    Four shops voted last night and each of them voted yes by pretty substantial numbers.  There are even folks claiming today that last night's votes do enough to guarantee overall passage, preventing tens of thousands of Michigan Chrysler workers from pulling out a gun, pointing it at their foot and pulling the trigger.  That's not to say everyone sees the process as peaches and cream.  According to this morning's FREEP:

    No matter the outcome of overall ratification votes, Gary Chaison, a professor of industrial relations at Clark University in Worcester, Mass., said he believes the UAW already has lost something.

    "Even if the contract is approved, it's not going to be a victory for the leadership of the UAW. The vote is in essence a protest against the company and a protest against the union," Chaison said. "A vote against the company for what it offered and against the union for accepting it."

    Talk about seeing the glass as half empty.  That seems to be a trend with impartial third party's looking in on Michigan this week, which brings us to the bad news.  A report issued yesterday by the Milken Institute ranked America's top 200 big cities and 179 small cities, looking at things like entrepreneurship, the overall business environment and the cost of doing business.  Guess who brought up the rear.

    The Detroit News reports that six of Michigan's small cities fell in the bottom twenty while eight of Michigan's big cities rank in the bottom twenty with our best showing, Ann Arbor at a pathetic 184.  Of course, that's a heck of a lot better than Lansing which ranked dead last.

    That's right, Lansing is ranked the WORST city for business in the United States of America.  Congratulations.

    Nolan Finley blogs at the News:

    Gov. Jennifer Granholm and lawmakers have adopted tax policy that discourages entrepreneurs from locating here, and will drive up the overall cost of doing business in the state.

    Already, many consulting and other service industry firms are saying they will leave the state if the new service tax on selected businesses isn't revoked.

    Michigan's fate will only change through sound growth policies. Unfortunately, that's not what Lansing is delivering.

    Finley's a consistent critic of the administration (with very good reason) but I think he's being generous here.  Dead last boys and girls.  That's not just not delivering, that's an abject failure.  These are real people's real lives we're talking about.

    And while we're on the good news / bad news tip, the Associated Press has an awesome profile piece on the Gary Peters controversy up at Central Michigan University, bad news for Peters and his Democrat supporters in the CMU administration but good news for taxpayers and proponents of common sense everywhere.  Oh, and Dennis Lennox, a conservative blogger who's been after Peters like an attack dog since he decided to take a job "educating" students while running full-time in a primary contest against the extremely popular anti-war Democrat Nancy Skinner some 200 odd miles away.  

    Bill Ballenger, who was the Griffin Endowed Chair before Peters, had Lennox in class last school year. He characterizes him as intelligent, polite, well-spoken and a political junkie, but adds: "He has a way of irritating just about everybody -- except me."

    The editor of a Lansing political newsletter and a former Republican state lawmaker, Ballenger says there are legitimate questions about whether Peters can continue in the job when the campaign gets into full swing. He also thinks the university could have handled Lennox's tactics better.

    "He's got them back on their heels. They don't know how to deal with him," he said.

    Which is good news, except that it's resulted in campus wide censorship as CMU becomes the only public university in the state to ban recording devices and to prevent students from recording Gary Peters' lectures.  Not like they were getting their money's worth anyway.

    The article is highly recommended.  So is Lennox's blog, the Peters Report.

    < Damage Control? Granholm's DCH Suspends Abortionist "Dr. P.'s" Medical License | T-Minus 6 Days: Things are getting scarier! >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Entrepreneurialism (none / 0) (#1)
    by Ed Burley on Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 12:26:27 PM EST
    It has for too long been the goal of just about everyone to find a way to collect taxes. After all, it is argued, we need taxes to run government. What is humorous about that scenario is that what we call government today shouldn't be running.

    A government that protects its citizens is a government that is wanted by its citizens. Citizens willingly pay to have such a government in place and running. It is in the public's best interest to fund such an endeavor.

    With government becoming a "Sugar Daddy" doling out favors to everybody in the state, it creates an entitlement mentality. People don't want to PAY for an entitlement - they want someone else to; usually someone who has more money than they. This is why taxes have become so difficult to collect. No one wants to pay for their government, even those who expect to benefit from such.

    If state government was scaled back to provide the constitutionally guaranteed protections, citizens would voluntarily send in a check each month, making sure that the police, the fire department, courts and corrections were fully funded. In addition, some form of "victim assistance" may also be in place to ensure that those victims are taken care of (e.g., foster care and adoption, since the removal of children SHOULD fall under law enforcement and be subject to the same restrictions of other crimes; e.g., due process).

    This would enable entrepreneurs to be able to truly get creative in ways of making money, without having to worry about things like sales tax, service tax, etc. There would be no "under the table" since people desiring only the protection afforded them by the government would gladly pay for that protection. There would be no overtaxation, since government would no longer be involved in education, health, social welfare, parks and recreation, etc.

    Everyone, current citizens or prospective citizens, would be able to start their own business - in their home, or in a facility. Baby shoe bronzing, massage therapy, consulting, etc. would not have to worry about being the new collection agent for the state. In fact, if certain "immorality-based" activities were left to one's own conscience rather than the courts, a huge number of entrepreneurs could practice freely in our state, becoming bread-winners rather than bread-takers.

    The fundamental governance in any society must be self-governance. Our society is slowly, progressively taking that away, and putting all governance in the hands of the State. Individualism is being swallowed up by the Collective, rather than the Community being strengthened by Individualism. It must change, or we can kiss our freedoms goodbye; as well as our prosperity.

    ed


    Circuses and Bread (none / 0) (#2)
    by Victor Laszlo on Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 10:57:26 PM EST
    I'm wondering when the Granholm administration is going to start providing publicly funded circuses and bread to the public.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search