Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    Clearly . . . (none / 0) (#6)
    by Kevin Rex Heine on Sat Aug 13, 2011 at 07:56:39 PM EST
    . . . L4R, you weren't paying attention.  As I've already said on this:

    Primary:  Open or "closed," it's a dumb idea

    As I said previously, there is no such thing as a "closed" primary in Michigan.  A truly closed primary means that voters have to register their party affiliation (if they have one) no later than a certain amount of days before the partisan primary election, and that's the voter's party-of-record until the next partisan registration deadline comes due.  We don't do that here in Michigan, that's not how our laws work.  The only thing "closed" about our partisan primaries is that you can only vote on one side of the ballot (the left or the right) on primary day.  So, yeah, anyone who spouts the line about "closed" primaries is blowing so much smoke; and anyone who truly believes that Michigan's primaries are closed is buying into the lie that "straight ticket primary" means the same thing as "closed primary."

    And all I'm saying is that, since there is no such thing as a truly closed primary in Michigan, and that the Michigan Democrat Party will have an incentive to tinker with the outcome, the "ten percent of ten percent" rule is something that those still supporting the primary option might want to seriously consider.  If the objective is to keep the democrats out of the republican nomination process, then in my opinion a primary is most certainly not the best answer.

    Closing Arguments and Decision Dilemma

    Before concluding, let me briefly review the key points of my arguments thus far:

    * There is no such thing in Michigan as a "closed" primary.  Under Michigan's current election law, any primary is wide open to any registered voter in this state, with total disregard for actual party affiliation.  Any pretense otherwise is a bathtub-sized crock of horse manure, and ought to be called out as such.  Also, any non-republican who votes in a republican primary cannot be expected to cast a vote that will be in the best interests of the GOP.  Thus, the question must be asked as to who benefits from a contaminated primary.

    The advantages of special primary election:

    • Doesn't "blow a hole" in party federal election spending limits
    • The mechanism for conducting a primary is already in place

    The disadvantages of special primary election:
    • Exposes the party to accusations of "wasting tax dollars"
    • Likely will require legislative action to schedule the date
    • Wide open to democrat party crossover contamination
    • Doesn't require any special organizing efforts by candidates
    • Questionable data collection for Voter Vault

    So, regardless of what the reasons are, MIGOP has opted for a presidential nomination method that is wide open to non-republican contamination . . . and they have done so in the face of better knowledge.

    And I'll tell you, in doing my dead level best to make the case for a county-by-county firehouse-style caucus, I received some responses from state committee members that were . . . well, let's just call them unnecessarily personal and leave it at that.  One or two even swore up and down that approving any method other than what the policy committee recommended would tear the party apart at the seams and pave the way for the democrats to run the table in 2012.  (Quite frankly, I hold the opinion that people who seriously espouse such a position need to be permanently shown the door at the next available opportunity.)

    Nevertheless, as things stand right now, the "ayes" have it and this is what we have to work with whether I like it or not.  So I'm going to my dead level best to make damn sure that any potential fifth-columnists in my hometown won't be able to offset an overwhelmingly unified conservative turnout.  (Because, unlike those who chose to resort to personal attacks against me, I am not going to allow an act of executive stupidity to wreck my mojo.)  And I recommend that all like-minded conservatives take a similar position.

    Parent

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search