Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Tell The Feds To Stuff It


    By JGillman, Section News
    Posted on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 02:02:26 PM EST
    Tags: Michigan, Institute for Justice, Tom McMillin, HB-5081, Seizures, IRS, Cash, Bureaucracy, Congress, Cowards (all tags)

    Due process is a critical component and a guarantee afforded by the United States Constitution.

    Of course, current events have shown that the constitution has has limited support from the cowards in congress. (Hint: the word is IMPEACHMENT) Inaction and a lack of oversight by congress into the executive operations has allowed the federal buraeucracy to operate with impunity. Adding to this, property forfeiture under the guise of criminal deterrence has been the source of income for local law enforcement that sells its soul to the justice department. From a Detroit News Editorial

    "Since the U.S. Department of Justice's Asset Forfeiture Fund was established in 1986, the federal government has used property forfeiture to deter criminal activity and to incentivize local governments to cooperate with federal anti-drug and anti-terrorism efforts. Under the 2001 Patriot Act, Congress expanded civil forfeiture to include cash transactions, requiring banks to report deposits of more than $10,000 to detect terror-related money-laundering schemes.

    But this instrument also has been used to harass law-abiding Americans, particularly business owners who regularly deposit cash of $7,000 to $9,000. The businesses are often seen as trying to skirt the $10,000 bank reporting requirement.

    Unfortunately innocent business owners have been paying the price for such over zealous efforts.

    Continued below the fold.

    But things could be worse.

    For example, a case in Michigan was dropped in Early November on a timing technicality, and two others followed suit for the same reason.  However, the IRS, and the Justice department are expected to pursue even more small businesses. From the same editorial

    "The small business had about $135,000 in assets taken. Stephen Dunn, of DUNN Counsel, which is representing the restaurant, says the failure of the government in this court action prompted the IRS to drop two other forfeiture cases.

    Consequently, Terry Dehko of Fraser, and Mark Zaniewski of Sterling Heights, both represented by Dunn, will get back all of their money. Dehko, who runs a grocery store, had $35,000 confiscated while Zaniewski, owner of a service station, lost about $65,000. Dunn is a local representative for the Institute of Justice, based in Arlington, Va., which has been fighting the stealth government seizures nationally.

    And the amplified cries of those we send to congress to defend us remain deafeningly silent.

    If not for the Institute for Justice (follow the link through - its well worth it) and the good men of Michigan's legislature like Representative Tom McMillin, business owners might just as well not plan on making enough to make those 'suspicious' deposits.

    Or any at all.

    < Tuesday Divertere - You Picked A Fine Time To Leave Me Blue Shield | Bentivolio Submits Government Website Legislation >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Old story, but still newsworthy. (none / 0) (#1)
    by KG One on Tue Dec 03, 2013 at 10:55:59 PM EST
    The local rag covered this story several months back.

    It's a little disconcerting that the gov't can take your money because...well just because.

    It's making predictions like this more and more likely.

    I commend Rep. McMillin for his efforts (none / 0) (#4)
    by Corinthian Scales on Wed Dec 04, 2013 at 11:49:49 AM EST
    I also would like to advise again that Rep. McMillin, and his cosponsors reconsider language within this bill.

    (4) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY [SHALL] CHARGE A FEE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT ENGAGE IN SEIZURES OR FORFEITURES DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD TO COVER THE ACTUAL COSTS TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR IMPLEMENTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION. A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY MAY USE FORFEITURE PROCEEDS TO PAY THE COST OF COMPILING AND REPORTING DATA UNDER THIS SECTION, INCLUDING ANY FEE IMPOSED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE.

    (5) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY [SHALL] WITHHOLD THE PAYMENT OF ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDS TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY THAT FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION UNTIL THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY COMPLIES WITH THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION.

    Without such change within the language, as observed elsewhere by our beloved public sector unionized State Jackboots, this bill is without teeth on that particular Centralized agency bureaucrats (MSP) in bed with the Feds.  An oversight I'm sure, however, that needs to be addressed all the same. Bottom line, these forfeitures re-venue seizures are nothing more than a racket for funding the shyster class <cough>Replevin & Performance Bond</cough>, anyway.  What a hundred some odd years of Publik Edjukshawn Skuewlz has done to dumb down Americans is simply gobsmacking, no, toe curling.

    Also noted is yet another union pensioned LEO foisting more treachery to run amok in a blatantly corrupt court system.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search