Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    It Appears Bart Stupak has caved


    By JGillman, Section News
    Posted on Sat Mar 20, 2010 at 01:06:30 AM EST
    Tags: Bart Stupak, Health Care, Abortion, Constitutionality (all tags)

    I know I was hoping he wouldn't, but it seems Mr. Stupak may have accepted some form of payoff on his reticence, and Pelosi was willing to piss off a few others to get him on board:

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has made a deal with Rep. Bart Stupak in order to secure his vote and that of other anti-choice Democrats for the health care bill, which is scheduled to be voted on this Sunday. According to a member of Congress who was briefed on the matter, Pelosi has agreed to let Stupak have a vote on his amendment either before or after the House votes to pass the Senate bill. It instructs the Senate to substitute the language in his amendment for the Senate language on abortion.

    The language used to cajole Mr Stupak into acquiescence, and upsetting that towering intellectual (read: sarcasm) Grayson of FL, demonstrates Stupak's pro-life stand is not very deep indeed...

    In the language it clears hurdles for tax payer funds paying for abortions of special nature.  We will all be accessories to the acts of abortion.. like it or not.

    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

    MR. STUPAK (for himself, MR. Berry, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Cao, Ms. Dahlkemper, Mr. Driehaus, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Mollohan, and Mr. Rahall) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the committee on ____

    CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Correcting the enrollment of H.R. 3590

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring) That in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3590, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the following corrections:

    (1) In the section 1303 amended by section 10104(c) of the bill -

    (A) in the section heading, insert "RELATING TO COVERAGE OF ABORTION SERVICES" after "SPECIAL RULES"; AND

    (B) strike subsection (a) and all of subsection (b) that precedes paragraph (4) and insert the following:

    "(a) IN GENERAL -- Nothing in this Act (or any amendment made by this Act) shall be construed to require any health plan to provide coverage of abortion services or allow the Secretary or any other person or entity implementing this Act (or amendment) to require coverage of such services.

    "(b) LIMITATION ON ABORTION FUNDING -

    "(1) iN GENERAL -- None of the funds authorized or appropriated by this Act (or an amendment made by this Act), including credits under section 36N of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, shall be expected for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion, except in the case where a woman suffers from the physical disorder physical injury, or physical illness that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, including life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, or unless the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.

    "(2) OPTION TO PURCHASE SEPARATE COVERAGE OR PLAN _- Subject to paragraph (1), noting in this subsection shall be construed as prohibiting any non-Federal entity (including an individual or a State orlocal government) from purchasing separate coverage for abortions for which funding is prohibited under this subsection, or a plan that inclues such abortions, so long as such coverage or plan is not purchased using the non-Federal funds required to receive a Federal payment, including a preminum payment required for the qualified health plan towards whith the credit described in paragraph (1) is applied or a State's or locality's contribution of Medicaid matching funds.

    "(3) OPTION TO OFFER COVERAGE OR PLAN -- Subject to paragraph (1), noting in this subsection shall restrict any non-Federal health insurance insurer offering a qualified health plan from offering separate coverage for abortions for which funding is prohibited under this subsection, or a plan that includes such abortions for which funding is prohibited under this subsection, or a plan that inclue3s such abortions, so long as any such insurer that offers a qualified health plan through any Exchange that includes coverage for abortions for which funding is prohibited under this subsection also offers a qualified health plan through the Exchange that is identical in every respect except it does not cover such abortions."

    (2) In subsection (a) of the section 1334 added by section 10104(q) of the bill, strike paragraph (6) and redesignate paragraph (7) as paragraph (6).

    We can only pray this constitutionally prohibitive monstrosity finds no more support than the current count (as of this writing ) of 208 votes for passage.  Stupak will face his maker, as we all will someday, and be judged appropriately, but in the meantime we will fight to have this bill stopped, or at the very least stricken as unconstitutional when passed on Sunday.

    In November we can hopefully find constitutionally competent legislators to fill their shoes, who are willing to PLEDGE removal of this and other social progressive bills that have damned a nation to outrageous debt and relative acceptance of tyranny.

    < Citizen legislators versus professional politicians. | Kill or Nullify the Health Care Bill Rally This Sunday! >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    I want a Ferrari too. (none / 0) (#1)
    by RushLake on Sat Mar 20, 2010 at 06:03:08 AM EST
    Stupak has at least two things going for him here in Michigan. He has his district which includes lots of union and retired union, Ann Arbor North (a.k.a. TC), and "Republican" constituents who can be counted on to vote for him because "he seems like he knows what he's doing."

    He also has a nearly non-existent Republican Party organization that has allowed him to get as far as he has because it doesn't and won't take him on, just as Karl Lenin gets a free ride election after election. Stupak has gotten his name "up in lights" through out this whole fiasco on all the big media, and WTCM local hosts give him a free pass everytime they get him on the air. Even if it turns out that Pelosi hasn't flipped him and his band of merry men, he is still a bad penny. And, he can stick his thumb in our eyes as long as he likes while insulting us with his condescending views on what's best for us in the process.

       

    I knew (none / 0) (#2)
    by grannynanny on Sat Mar 20, 2010 at 08:15:45 AM EST
    I knew he would cave in my heart of hearts so this is no surprise.  Just hoping the good doc in Iron Mountain who is running against him can knock him out in November.

    huh? (none / 0) (#5)
    by combs on Sun Mar 21, 2010 at 02:22:28 AM EST
    Where exactly anywhere do you find this to be true?

    ---"In the language it clears hurdles for tax payer funds paying for abortions of special nature.  We will all be accessories to the acts of abortion.. like it or not."----

    I am personally against abortion and against tax funds being used for abortions, although it being I am pro-choice.  But what you're saying is just flat out not true in any form of what is accurate.

    But I love how you claim A. He was paid off to vote this way. Even though he voted yay the first time around.  And B) that he will meet his make. As if, if God is looking down on us bitching about the government and taxes rather than the well being of the human race.  Give me a break.

    Stupak makes it official (none / 0) (#7)
    by Rougman on Sun Mar 21, 2010 at 05:34:43 PM EST
    His vote is yes.  

    A huge victory for socialist leaning bureaucrats who, if this bill passes and is implemented, pretty much have themselves cemented into a lifetime job.  

    A huge loss for patients, taxpayers, and freedom loving citizens.  Of course Stupak was going to vote yes.  

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search