NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
The single greatest argument against abortionBy Theblogprof, Section News
This is the forth post in a series focusing on the pro-life issue leading up to the critical 2010 elections, which will be a turning point for Michigan and the nation. As every week passes I am convinced of this. Life is, however, constantly under attack. Always on the defense. Always the target. Not only the unborn anymore, but our seniors as well. Seniors who need more health care than younger Michiganders and Americans in general. Going forward, we must arm ourselves with knowledge, and fight such devaluing as it affects us all as a society. Thus the reason for this important series of posts.
In the last few weeks, I covered the moral and scientific pro-life arguments against the murder of the innocent. In formulating both of those argument, I mentioned that we all live within the framework of certain laws. These are universal laws that were imposed by The Creator over which we have no control. The natural laws are layered, in my estimation, as such:
With all of the information brought forth in the last few weeks, it is not enough. You could argue with the other side regarding logic, reason, the 2nd law, and morality until you are blue in the face. It is likely that the other side won't go there with you. Pro-aborts simply will not argue the morality of abortion itself for instance. But there is one argument that is undeniable, that can't be turned aside, that everyone knows but some are afraid to look. The single best argument against abortion. Drum roll please... ... ... ... ... ... ...
The baby is the best argument against abortion. The one thing the pro-abort movement was successful in was stripping the baby of his or her personhood. Just a clump of cells. Just tissue. Nothing more than a blob of flesh. Medical science has changed that. Since we can now literally look into the womb with sonograms and so called 4-D ultrasound, there is no question as to what we are looking at. What are pro-aborts to do, then? Simple. Prevent women from looking at an ultrasound. The latest news on this front comes just a few states over from us. In North Dakota, an abortion business has recently sued to prevent women from seeing the ultrasound, which is now part of an informed consent law there, even though the abortion clinic does an ultrasound as a standard procedure before the abortion anyway. It's not the ultrasound, it's the mother seeing what the abortionists are seeing.
In fact, I found it interesting that former abortionists who have repented later told there stories. One common thread was that they themselves wouldn't look at the remains in the sock of the 'vacuum cleaner.' They may have early on, but someone else checks the remains. They had trouble with the ultrasound as well. It's far easier to deliberately turn a blind eye to obvious evil. Some finally looked, and knew immediately that a murder was committed. Here are a few revealing snippets from former abortionists via Pro-Life America: Former abortionist, Joseph Randall, M.D., says, "The picture of the baby on the ultrasound bothered me more than anything else. The staff couldn't take it. Women who were having abortions were never allowed to see the ultrasound."These former abortionists have repented of their great sins. They saw the obviousness of the truth. They woke up and took the red pill and saw reality. Unfortunately, the majority of pro-aborts wake up and take the blue pill and pretend then to live in ignorant bliss. Except they don't. When one does something wrong, something against the moral order, the conscience is there to sound the alarm bell. But the bell can be ignored. As time goes on, the ringing of that bell can be heard less and less until the person is tone-deaf to their own conscience. They have hardened their heart. Don't take my word for it, though. Take the word of the above former pro-aborts. From The Forerunner, here's how Dr. David Brewer from above finally woke up: "I didn't have a moral or ethical background when I went into residency. I remember the first abortion I witnessed. It was performed by the resident physician. I didn't know what to expect. It was my job afterward to undo the jar and see what was inside. It was a new experience, and I've always found it exciting to learn new things. When I opened the little bag, the resident physician said, `Put it on the blue cloth to see if we got everything out.'A hot poker right through the conscience indeed. If that account alone doesn't send a chill down your spine, doesn't light your fire for the truth of the pro-life movement, then maybe your wood is wet. Click over and read the other accounts. The reality of what is in the womb is no longer at issue. In essence, it is no longer an issue about what the baby is, but rather where the baby is. The argument is the personhood of the baby. In essence, the pro-aborts have painted themselves into the same corner that the pro-slavery movement found itself in so many years ago. As the argument went then, a slave really isn't a person. The argument was that there were two different "persons" in the U.S. Constitution. One for slaves, and one for everyone else. As ridiculous as that sounds today, it held water for many years, primarily by judicial fiat perpetrated by activist judges legislating from the bench rather than upholding the Constitution. An ironic parallel in history indeed. The pro-aborts are in the same place today. If ever you want to condone murder, simply redefine someone as a non-person. Viola! Problem solved! Reality, of course, is quite different and not subject to man-made legal definitions. In whatever argument you find yourself with a pro-abort, or those sitting on the fence, never forget the baby.
Previously in this series:
The single greatest argument against abortion | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)
The single greatest argument against abortion | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)
|