"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

    I cannot support House Bill 5524 and SB 213. These bills will drive up the cost for both consumers and Michigan Business. This bill will reduce competition to 10%, and give Consumers Power and Detroit Edison a guaranteed customer base of 90%, which by any measure is a virtual monopoly. It also mandates that 10% of our energy must be produced by renewable energy sources by 2020, and will add an additional charge on every Michigan citizen, business, and industrial user's bill.

    In a free enterprise system if someone wants to start a new business, build a new facility, or advance a new product line; they send out a venture capital, stock and bond offering inquiry to see if there is interest and support. If there is sufficient interest and support they get their venture capital, sell the stock and bonds, and they start the business, build the facility, and put the new line into production. That is how our entire capitalistic system works and has made America the greatest economic power in the world. This system should not be applied to one industry, but not another, it should apply to all industries equally. Consumers and DTE are great companies but why should the state of Michigan have to promise them anything, when they can do the same thing that every other private company does to raises capitol to build a new facility which will generate a profit.

    These bills limit consumer and business choice, create costly and unrealistic mandates, and monopolize Michigan's electric system, all of which will drive up electrical costs. Government should not pick winners and losers, they should not pick one energy company over another, and they should stay out of the market place!

    For these reasons, I will not support the proposed energy bills."

He is correct.  And acting on PRINCIPLE, a rarety in the Michigan legislature it seems, he and Jack Hoogendyk, and a few others voted to not allow this obvious setback of Michigan energy policy. What Michigan government has done is raised the cost on Michigan residents when they are already reeling from higher fuel and heating costs.

And though some say BUSINESS will receive some advantage in electrical rates, it is all just a matter of reshuffling the deck, and a little sleight of hand.  PEOPLE will pay more.  You, Me, and anyone who lives in or vacations here.  Business paying less? Not likely.  When you add the pay raise requests of the employees who all of a sudden are facing an extra $20 or more a month in electric rates per household, it all plays in the double dealt hand we have gotten from the bottom of the deck. Proponents have said the electric rates will "only" increase $6.50 a month for the average homeowner who pays $75 as month.   Yes..  The average home owner who has CNG water heat, Stove, and goes to bed at 8pm.

Gratuitous Friedman Quote:

   "Monopolies come from many sources, but direct and indirect government intervention is the most common, and it should be stopped wherever possible."

Arguably, the most economically astute man who has ever lived.

Monopolies exist, but for a short time..  unless they are institutionalized by government.  Free markets allow the challenge of emerging companies to break the monopolies by bringing a similar product to market in newer and more efficient ways.  In this case, if wind, solar or other renewable electricity producing products can be brought as an efficient alternative to the current production set, then they would prosper on their own.  The mandate as determined by those who have little understanding of how markets work or even the scientific basis of the production of electricity leaves us with law designed to protect inefficiency of the large energy concerns while they attempt to proceed in the path they had already started down on.