Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Mike Cox Letter To The Freep After Hit-Piece Editorial Scolding The AG For Doing His Job!


    By Theblogprof, Section News
    Posted on Thu Jul 09, 2009 at 09:18:52 AM EST
    Tags: media bias, Michigan, Mike Cox (all tags)

    (Promoted by Nick... Thanks, Prof, for being all over the Ivory Tower on this one! They should be embarrassed.)

    Cross-posted at theblogprof

    I wrote just last night about how the Detroit Free Press in an act of utter and blatant dishonesty painted Mike Cox as a rogue politician trying to get a leg up on the Governors race in 2010. (Uberliberal Detroit Free Press Pens Editorial Hatchet Piece On MI AG Mike Cox (and the 2nd Amendment too)) They did this by pointing to the AGs filing an Amicus brief to the SCOTUS regarding an unconstitutional handgun ban in Chicago that mirrors a similar ordinance that was shot down (heh) by the SCOTUS in the Heller decision. The NRA opposed the ordinance. The Free Press totally failed to mention, deliberately versus by shear ignorance I think, that Cox joined 33 other states in the filing. Or that Cox filed an amicus brief, again alongside other states, in said Heller decision. This is a typical function for a state AG when bad law even has a possibility of becoming incorporated thereby forcing all 50 states to abide by that decision.

    Mike Cox wrote a letter today to The Detroit Free Press:

    A stand for principle on gun rights.
    The Free Press editorialized Wednesday -- "Your taxes at work for the NRA (and Cox)" -- against my filing of a legal brief with the U.S. Supreme Court that supports the National Rifle Association's challenge of a Chicago ordinance banning the possession of most handguns.

    My support for this challenge to the Chicago gun ban is rooted in Michigan's own Constitution, which states: "Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state."

    My defense of this constitutional principle is longstanding. In 2007, I filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in opposition to the District of Columbia's drastic ban on guns, arguing that the Second Amendment's right "to keep and bear arms" is an individual right. The Supreme Court agreed with that position and overturned the D.C. ban in its Heller decision.

    The Free Press failed to mention that 34 attorneys general signed on to the NRA's challenge of Chicago's strict gun ban, including both Democrats and Republicans. This isn't about politics; it's about standing up for principle.

    It may come as news to the Free Press, but this office files amicus briefs all the time to protect the rights of the state and its citizens. For example, this office has filed amicus briefs in support of the Big Three auto industry and tougher standards to protect the Great Lakes.

    In my own experience of more than 13 years as a homicide prosecutor and head of the homicide unit of the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office, I never saw anyone charged with murder who had a license to legally carry a concealed weapon. Most people who want to possess guns are law-abiding and present no threat to others. Rather than the availability of weapons, my experience is that gun violence is driven by culture, police presence, or the lack of same, and failures in the supervision of parolees and probationers.

    Since becoming attorney general, I have worked to ensure that the rights of Michigan citizens to defend themselves are protected. For example, I have expanded the number of states that recognize Michigan CCW permits from eight states to 35 states. And I'll continue to take action when constitutional priciples are threatened.

    I make no apologies for my support of the Constitution and the Second Amendment.

    Mike Cox

    Michigan Attorney General, Lansing
    Darned right! Kudos to Mike Cox for the quick response. The Free Press, as of this morning, has nothing to say.  Except this:

    By the way, who wants to bet dollar to doughnuts that the freep never slammed Granholm for filing any such amicus brief when she was the MI AG and also running for Governor?

    < Thursday in the Sphere: July 9 | Markets provide low-cost alternatives for uninsured >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    I'm coming around. (none / 0) (#1)
    by MoparMan on Thu Jul 09, 2009 at 09:26:54 AM EST
    I was skeptical about Cox - but between this and his tax cut talk, he's starting to make me a believer.  


    If Mr. Cox wants to show how serious he is... (none / 0) (#3)
    by KG One on Thu Jul 09, 2009 at 10:16:26 AM EST
    ...then he should push for a repeal of ALL laws regarding law-abiding citizens obtaining firearms here in Michigan and STRONGLY advocates going to Vermont-style carry.

    If he steps up to the plate and does that, then he'll get my attention (and maybe even my support).

    If not, then this is just another dog-and-pony show to garner media attention and not really showing any committment to the Second Amendment.


    • Yeah by quigonjames, 07/09/2009 04:10:15 PM EST (none / 0)
    In for a penny... (none / 0) (#5)
    by KG One on Thu Jul 09, 2009 at 11:40:28 AM EST
    ...in for a pound.

    I see where you're coming from, but the status quo of nickle-and-diming us on our rights needs to end.

    Yes, he got the hackles up on the fish paper over his support. But can you imagine the Maalox moment they'll be experiencing on Fort Street when he pushes for a full-blown repeal?

    And on your second part, even though I loved to play with revolvers as a kid (cap guns, of course), as an adult, I prefer a Glock-19 over a revolver any day

    The Second Amendment is a US (none / 0) (#7)
    by RushLake on Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 05:36:59 AM EST
    Constitutional right and should be protected by people like Karl Lenin, Stabenow, Conyers, Obama, Holder, Cheeks Kilpatrick, etc, under the guidance and diligence of we the people. Some of us aren't doing our job.

    Since we can't reach those Washington politicians who could care less what we think about the 2nd Amendment or any of the rest of the Constitution, let's kick hell out of State politicians who do stand up. Let's just do nothing. That'll show them won't it?

    .45 Springfield XP.

    Historical ignorance (none / 0) (#9)
    by stevenstmason on Fri Jul 10, 2009 at 11:41:51 PM EST
    Why do conservatives have to be so historically ignorant? You say:

    "Me also thinks that there are 56 signers spinning in their graves."

    about the lack of the Pledge and the Motto. The motto dates back to the Civil War and didn't become the official motto until the 1950s. The Pledge was first written by a Socialist in the 1890s and the current version wasn't adopted until the 1950s. The 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence would have no knowledge of either the Motto or the Pledge.

    I just don't know... (none / 0) (#11)
    by rdww on Sat Jul 11, 2009 at 09:49:13 AM EST
    ...on the one hand, Cox makes the right noises on the Second Amendment here.  On the other hand:
    A: He still owes some major apologies to single dads.
    B: He's still a creep.
    C: He looks too much like Seann William Scott.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search