NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
MI Property Tax Relief, the MEA, and Human ShieldsBy Theblogprof, Section News
cross-posted at theblogprof
Yesterday, the Republican-controlled MI Senate fell short by 2 votes to push through a constitutional amendment, which would have to be voted on by Michigan residents in November, to prevent property taxes from increasing while home values are decreasing. Makes sense to me, but the Democrats sure don't like it. From the DetNews today: Mich. Senate comes up short in property tax relief vote. (The AP has a shorter report over at MLive)
The vote was 23-11 in favor of the resolution with three Senate members absent. It takes approval by two-thirds of the members in each chamber of the Legislature to put a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot, meaning 25 Senate votes would be needed to move the resolution over to the House for a vote.That's the good news. The bad news? It has to go through the MI House as well, controlled by Democrats. In the Senate, all 11 no votes came from Democrats. Why? Well, you can judge for yourselves, but here's something that comes up at the very end of the article:
The proposal also is opposed by the Michigan Education Association -- the state's biggest teacher union -- and the Michigan League for Human Services, a nonprofit representing low-income and other "vulnerable" residents.Ah yes - the MEA. And what do they trot out? Human shields. If we don't get a tax increase, your house will burn down! You won't be protected anymore! They never mention bloated pension benefits, bloated health benefits, bloated administrative costs, etc. Nope. We'll get rid of police officers and firefighters. Never mind the fact that this proposal would not decrease property taxes, only keep them from going up when home values are going down. In addition, the House and Senate cannot pass this amendment by themselves. It must be approved by the voters in November. So what the naysayers are saying is they don't want the voters to decide on this issue! Note also that these people consider the absence of a property tax increase as "lost taxes." Huh? Yep -the same logic (or lack thereof) that states that a decrease in the spending increase is tantamount to a cut in spending. Uh - no. No it is not. It is simply a smaller spending increase. Groan... Why doesn't the Detroit News call them out on the above points? The dishonest tactics? The false assertions? The human shields? It's almost as if there a liberal bias or something. Nah... Couldn't be...
MI Property Tax Relief, the MEA, and Human Shields | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
MI Property Tax Relief, the MEA, and Human Shields | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
|