NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
Counterpoint to Mr. Lennox. Michigan does not need a Constitutional ConventionBy Republican Michigander, Section News
In another thread posted here, Dennis Lennox makes the case that Michigan needs a Constitutional Convention. While it is an elequoent case, based on term limits and the poor judiciary takeover attempt by the democrats with their latest ballot proposal, I could not disagree more with him at this time for several reasons.
First off, too many elitist types will hijack a constitutional convention to get rid of our top safeguards against tax increases - the Headlee Amendment and Proposal A. If the constitution is opened up, that is fair game, as is our version of the 2nd Amendment (Article 1, sec 6) and a host of other issues.
The main pushers of this group pushing for the conbention is the current bunch at "Citizens for Michigan" lead by elitist democrats and liberal republicans. People like newspaper publisher and former UM trustee Phil Power (D), tax hike supporter Joe Schwarz and his buddy Harry Gast, Former AG Frank Kelley, Debbie Dingell, John Hertel, and Dan DeGrow. That gets my guard up if there ever was one. Most of those legislators were not exactly the epidomy of greatness while in Lansing. Anyone in Southeast Michigan who reads the Brighton Argus, Livingston County Press, and Observor and Eccentric Newspapers know the leanings of Mr. Power. Back in late 2006, they had a study with several recommendations to change our constitution. Their recommendations are as follows.
1. Increase Term Limits 2. Make it harder for constitutional amendments to be passed here. This was in response to the holy grail of the elite and the Richard Florida crowd - affirmative action. That's a large part of what spun this into action. Now the left is trying to gore our ox on the ballot initative. Maybe so, but that's not a good reason to throw this out.
3. - Eliminating the state Natural Resources and the Agriculture commissions and allowing the governor to appoint her entire cabinet 4. Allowing the governor to appoint members of the State Board of Education and the governing boards of the state's three largest universities, subject to advice and consent of the State Senate and a partisan balance. Currently, members of the State Board of Education, regents of the University of Michigan, trustees of Michigan State University and governors of Wayne State University are elected. Again, why should Granholm have this power? While I'm not a fan of the convention nomination system and prefer old fashion primaries, I at least have SOME say with that system. I'd rather let people have the say as opposed to the elite. Maybe it's just my Jeffersonian roots. If this is going to be changed, let there be primaries. 5. Allow the governor to appoint Supreme Court Justices to a single 10-year term with partisan balance on the high court. HELL NO! Dealbreaker right off the bat. Partisan balance does not exist and will not as long as there are appointments. The most powerful branch of government needs to be balanced by the people and not by politicians. While I do not agree with a convention nomination system, anything that takes away the checks and balances away from the people is damn wrong. If Stephen Reinhardt is appointed under this new proposal, I have no say whatsoever in opposing his disregard for the constitution. Under the current system, I can vote him out.
6. - Levy an additional statewide mill to fund school district building programs that over time would reduce bonding mills at the local level A tax increase. No way.
7. Eliminate super-majority voting requirements spelled out in the constitution. Banking code amendments were one example of voting requirements. Why? Why was there a supermajority in the first place? 8. - Eliminate restrictions on local taxation, particularly for transportation No. I remember the days of the runaway millages back in the late 80's. People were taxed out of their homes. We need fiscal responsibility instead and less taxes. I don't have Phil Power's money. 9. - Eliminate the Headlee rollback provision in Article IX, Section 31 That is the number one goal of the leftists who want to have a constitutional convention. Eliminate the barriers so our taxes go up. 10. Alter language regarding local elected official recalls so that the only reason for recall would be malfeasance or misfeasance The democrats are still mad about losing the state senate after the 1983 tax increase. Tax increases are a damn good reason for a recall. It's another check and balance the leftists and the elitists want to take away from us since they believe they know better. 11. Allow the governor the option of a "pocket-veto" We do not need to give the executive any more powers. We have the veto and override. That's good enough. There's a reason why we do not have a lot of constitutional conventions. People are rightly suspicious when it comes to changing it. I really would not want to see the elimination of Headlee or the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, ex post facto laws, or tax safeguards in this state. They were enacted for a good reason. Government abused its power, and people moved to limit it. With a constitutional convention, all these safeguards are on the table to be removed. That is unacceptable. I will say this. If there will be a constitutional convention, I will run for constitutional delegate and will knock on 15,000+ doors and try and raise $50,000+ if I have to win that delegate spot in an election. Freedom will be attacked, and it must be defended with absolute vigilance.
Counterpoint to Mr. Lennox. Michigan does not need a Constitutional Convention | 7 comments (7 topical, 0 hidden)
Counterpoint to Mr. Lennox. Michigan does not need a Constitutional Convention | 7 comments (7 topical, 0 hidden)
|
Poll
|