Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Despite continuing challenges, America achieving success in Iraq


    By TimWalberg, Section News
    Posted on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 09:36:14 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    (Promoted by Nick... welcome back to Right Michigan, Congressman!)

    General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker return to Capitol Hill this week to provide an update on American efforts in Iraq. Both the General and Ambassador will share significantly better news than during their last Congressional briefing in September 2007.

    American and Iraqi forces have stabilized and secured much of Iraq, and Iraqi leaders have made modest but meaningful political progress. While continuing challenges remain in Iraq, the remarkable counterinsurgency strategy implemented by General Petraeus and the heroic efforts of American troops have transformed Iraq from a nation on the verge of civil war into one filled with potential for freedom and democracy.

    More below.

    General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker return to Capitol Hill this week to provide an update on American efforts in Iraq. Both the General and Ambassador will share significantly better news than during their last Congressional briefing in September 2007.

    American and Iraqi forces have stabilized and secured much of Iraq, and Iraqi leaders have made modest but meaningful political progress. While continuing challenges remain in Iraq, the remarkable counterinsurgency strategy implemented by General Petraeus and the heroic efforts of American troops have transformed Iraq from a nation on the verge of civil war into one filled with potential for freedom and democracy.

    Unfortunately, the success story authored by our troops has garnered little attention in the media as the fourth estate largely took a six month vacation from covering Iraq. As I learned in January during a trip to Iraq, troops feel the American public is not receiving a full perspective about positive developments in Iraq, and many have started their own blogs or websites to communicate their point of view.

    So this week as we evaluate our future involvement in Iraq, it is important that the American public receives a full picture of what is going on in Iraq.

    I entered Congress in January 2007 in the middle of a war that was not going well. Our troops were fighting an asymmetrical war with traditional, outdated tactics and folks like Senator John McCain were rightly calling for a new strategy.

    Two options existed: surrender or, as many military experts demanded, employ a surge. Despite the objections of some, Congress allowed our military leaders to do what they have been trained to do, and a new strategy was implemented. Today, America and Iraq are both reaping the benefits of the surge.

    According to a recent study, terrorist activities killed 1,087 in Baghdad during February 2007, but that number dropped to 178 in January 2008. Iraq is rebuilding its infrastructure and communities are blossoming again.

    More importantly, Iraqi military forces are fighting alongside American troops against terrorists in Iraq, and as we saw recently in Basra, Iraqis are increasingly taking more responsibility for their own security. The Iraqi army is stepping up and now suffers three times the casualties suffered by U.S. troops. Overall, causalities have declined.

    I am confident General Petraeus has Iraq moving in the right direction. He told me personally that a carbon copy of America should not be expected in Iraq, nor is it necessary, but Iraq must continue to become more independent and accept greater responsibility. This is exactly what Americans should expect to hear from our leadership in Iraq.  Iraq has the potential to be a stable democratic state and U.S. ally, and most importantly, a state that does not harbor terrorists.

    Many in Michigan are tired of the cost of the Iraq War, and I understand these frustrations. Though undeniable progress is being made in Iraq, an immediate withdrawal of American troops would be a significant setback in our comprehensive battle against terrorists.

    We need to continue recent progress and maintain order and peace in Iraq so terrorists do not take control. The last thing the world needs is another terrorist-sponsoring country aiming destructive powers at free nations.

    Just as we are driving terrorists out of Afghanistan and monitoring terrorist cells worldwide, American and Iraqi forces must continue working in Iraq against foreign-backed terrorists, and fighting these terrorists in Iraq makes Americans safer here in the United States.

    < Sen. Ray Basham: "Smoking cigars sadder than troops dying." | The Michigan Axis of Evil >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Well... (none / 0) (#1)
    by jgillmanjr on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 12:29:36 PM EST
    "Shock and awe" really isn't what it claimed it was. Of course it wasn't any help that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz berated Shinseki and kept him from really doing his job - making decisions aimed to benefit the United States Army in it's assigned missions.

    If this thing was to succeed on a quicker time table, the damn politicians have to let the military leadership do what they have to do. In my opinion, Rumsfeld and his yes men fucked this up, and made things harder than they had to be if only he had kept his mouth shut.

    I'm not anti-war. Hell, I'm completely opposite of that. I'm just saying the damn politicians need to keep their noses out of stuff they know nothing about. Rumsfeld's history as a Naval aviator does not a good leader necessarily make.

    Yes, it's in the past, but I just wanted to mention this thing probably could have gone a lot better..
    </rant>

    Thank you Congressman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (none / 0) (#2)
    by maidintheus on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 07:59:55 PM EST
    Dear Congressman Walberg,

    Thank you for taking the time to update us on this issue. Our military is very precious and I appreciate the great job they're doing with this vital work that is required of them.

    Sincerely yours.

    American Military achieving success despite ... (none / 0) (#3)
    by maidintheus on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 08:33:55 PM EST
    ...egregious attacks from the home front.

    People, if we go back and look at all our successful wars we would find a lot of (even terrible) mistakes were made. Not to excuse any but those involved before would have had an easier time regrouping if there had not been a huge effort going on to undermine there every action. They were damned if they did/didn't. Prior to the surge, even during the Rumsfeld era, if the "right" talked about more troops, the "left" cried out against it. If the "right" said okay, we can do without more troops, the "left" cried for more. When it was certain that we had won the "surge propaganda" there were cries against sending more troops and how it wouldn't work.

    One can know the magnificent accomplishments of our military efforts those on the ground. When a Marine was there in 2006 it was a mess. They made a difference but it was Blood, Sweat, and Tears. They returned home without some of their brothers, who gave their all. When this same Marine was there in 2007-08, he called his family to say, "We're winning this war, I've seen it with my own eyes." When he called his little brother (also a Marine) they spoke of how they were winning the hearts of the Iraqi people and that the "real" war was here, at home.

    why, why, why (none / 0) (#4)
    by maidintheus on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 09:04:27 PM EST
    Why do we hear so much parroting of the cost of this war? Thank God we will never know the cost of not doing this war. Think about it. All those people, whose ideas and opinions you think are so rotten for us are the very ones who spew this crap. Don't you think that's suspect?

    Regardless, if we were this vocal of all the wasteful spending, wasteful programs, all the wasteful crap, we'd have lots to spend on a war when needed. This country does not have a lack of money. Just what should our government be taking, then spending? Just what the heck should our government spend it on? If the Constitution counts for anything, there is only a handful of things the government should be spending money on.

    Why, after the government has made provision to tax and spend for an innumerable number of things far and wide, do we get all concerned when we have a war effort expenditure that puts us into debt. Why do some seem to see the military/war as the budget problem? A clue: Those who spew this strawman the loudest, who know we are at war and it's costing a lot, haven't slowed their spending and are even now devising new programs and expanding others. Don't you think that if it was a fiscal concern they were truly after they would slow their spending? Hypocrites and liars!

    Why would we tie our military's hands like this? This is no way to treat (any of) those who work to keep the peace.

    We're either going to believe that the Constitution should be followed or not.

     

    Big difference.. (none / 0) (#6)
    by jgillmanjr on Wed Apr 09, 2008 at 11:35:41 PM EST
    between civilian control of the military and how operations are handled. Once the civilian government decides to have an operation go down, they should get the hell out of the way and let the experts decide how to make it happen.

    Good officers don't micromanage, and we'd appreciate it if the civilian government didn't micromanage either.

    By the way, I'm not the only that that believes Rumsfeld was incompetent.

    This is more what I was trying to say! (none / 0) (#8)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 02:19:38 PM EST
    Dear goppartyreptile,

    I could have a wonderful time just going through your post and researching. Beautifully written. Great balance. Objective eye on the whole court.

    Thank you for saying so intelligently what was in my heart.

    Another comparison you make me think of is the results and why...would take looking at the whole picture there too. Some that you mention from the past are so different from now, due the home front. Makes me almost (!) sorry for the rascally Rumsfeld...

    • I appreciate by goppartyreptile, 04/11/2008 09:55:24 PM EST (none / 0)
    jgillmanjr (none / 0) (#10)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 03:02:55 PM EST
    I think your rant was great!  I think we're all saying "kind of" the same here. And a word for those guys who are on the ground (Yea!!! and ever grateful!)and know what's going on. They haven't been calling this a Corporal's war for nothing.  But they all have a valid job even though they seem to compete.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    Related Links

    + Also by TimWalberg
    create account | faq | search