Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Losing credibility much?


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 06:59:00 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    The MSM has just discovered what we've known for months now here in the real world.  The way the Democrats are behaving in Michigan lately is A) not so good and B) could cost them at the polls in November.  For Pete's sake, a recent Rasmussen poll put Republican John McCain ahead of both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama here in the Wolverine State, a State that hasn't gone red since 1988.  That's 20 years.  That's longer than a good portion of Right Michigan readers have even been alive.  

    Scandal after scandal continue to chip away at the Dems chances this November while their likely nominee's decision to treat Michigan as fly-over country hasn't helped either.  All of that mixed with the DNC's insistence that our delegates to their convention just plain won't count hurts them in the abstract and has driven down their poll numbers but the Ivory Tower highlights another problem for the lefties.  With Kwame Kilpatrick embroiled in legal proceedings that threaten his freedom for the next fifteen years what's he going to be able to do to turn out Detroit?

    Throw in the acrimony between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and threats from some of their supporters to either stay home on Election Day or cross party lines if their candidate isn't the nominee, and turnout for Democrats in Detroit, one of the state's biggest cities, looms larger in importance.

    "The only reason Michigan is a blue state is because blacks vote for a Democratic candidate," said Vincent Hutchings, an associate professor at the University of Michigan's Center for Political Studies. "Obviously, a mayor plays a nontrivial role here."

    Three key Democratic Party insiders -- all of whom spoke to the Free Press on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity surrounding the mayor's situation -- said there are issues that will have to be addressed regarding the get-out-the-vote apparatus in Detroit if Kilpatrick is still in office battling felony charges come fall.

    Would you look at that... Democrats fighting amongst themselves.  Paying attention Senator Schauer?  (Remember, Mark told the big MDP fundraising dinner last weekend that the left isn't really fighting at all... no problems... none at all... no word on whether or not he's brining me that pony when he comes back from dream land.)

    Read on...

    Still, as much as I'd like to seize on the article and claim that things are a mess and the end of the Dem dominance is nigh I'm just not that crazy.  There's only one thing that could keep Detroit voters home and it has nothing to do with Kwame Kilpatrick this year.  

    If Barack Obama is the Dems nominee, and barring theft on the convention floor in Denver he should be, Detroit will turn out.  If Clinton continues to go nuclear on the Barackstar and steals the thing from under his nose the whole ballgame changes.

    Two cycles ago I'd be singing a different tune.  The importance of the mayor in turning out the vote in Detroit is well documented and universally understood among the political hack class.  Things changed a little bit in 2006.  The feud between the mayor and Jennifer Granholm is legendary and some observers on the ground have suggested that the full machinery of the turn-out machine remained stalled throughout that fall.  Didn't make a lick of difference.  

    There was a lefty tsunami sweeping the nation and Detroit was caught up in it like everyone else.  Turnout was through the roof and the Dems coasted.  Add a character like Barack Obama to the mix in a city like Detroit and frankly, I think we'll break turnout records.  And those aren't John McCain voters.

    But hey, props to the FREEP and Democrat strategists for wringing their hands over the idea.  I hope they're right and I'm wrong.

    Either way they won't need help from Robert Brager, this gay cat living in the Netherlands so he can be with his husband.  (What a world.)  This is the gentleman that Detroit News columnist Charlie LeDuff lionizes in perhaps the worst headlined piece since the Soviets proclaimed "Russian car finishes second, American second to last" following a two car race.

    This headline declares:  Democratic exile offers to help Mich.

    Doesn't take much reading to learn that it's less an article about helping Michigan than about the "travails" of a homosexual lawyer from New Jersey who fell in love with a Dutch judge and knows next to nothing about Michigan.  But he knows he likes committing sodomy with men.  That much he knows.  

    Mr. Brager is the chairman of Democrats Abroad and a delegate to the Dems convention in Denver.  He and twenty-one other ex-pats will each have one half of a vote on the floor (which, coincidentally, is more than any Michigan resident will have).  He likes Obama.  He's really really gay.  He hates America.  He likes long walks in the park.  I'm not kidding.  All of this is in the article.  Helping Michigan?  Not so much.  But we do get this treat...

    He gasped to learn that Michigan leads the nation in unemployment and population loss and consistently ranks near the top in home foreclosure rates. "My God, I didn't know things were that bad there."

    Sound like a guy who's out to help Michigan?  Who's capable?  He also says we're "one of those" when he learns that we banned gay marriage.  Oh yeah, I can feel the love.  The platonic love.  Not the other kind.

    Nineteen paragraphs in the article and you've got to read through the whole piece to find out how, precisely, the man offers to help Michigan.  Because that was the headline... the title of the article.  Dem exile offers to help Michigan.  Ready for it?

    "If you want me to do something for Michigan, then let Bob come home," he said. "Change the law."

    If you hadn't guessed, Bob is his big blonde Dutch boy toy.  

    So I'd like to go ahead and take this moment to congratulate the Detroit News for publishing A) the most misleading headline I've maybe ever read, B) a pro-sodomy fluff piece (I said fluff... no "er") and C) blowing every shred of editorial credibility they had left by mixing the two.  Agenda much?  Think you could tag Charlie LeDuff's politics and pet issues from a hundred yards away?

    What a joke.

    But I hey, the Tigers finally won last night so I really can't complain about anything this morning.

    < The Michigan Axis of Evil | Thursday in the Sphere, April 10 >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    just some thoughts about creativity (none / 0) (#1)
    by maidintheus on Thu Apr 10, 2008 at 02:44:00 PM EST
    TODD SPANGLER:

    "Take Detroit out of the statewide totals for both candidates...

    To be sure, most people in Detroit will vote for a Democrat, as they have for decades."

    These statements indicate an unaltered view from eras such as the "Jim Crow" era.  Perhaps any people who have been through a holocaust or genocide, as the black folk have, would have (understandably) this view.  

    It must be true that most people in Detroit believe that the Federal Government is their savior and that the State will not be able or willing to protect them if needed.  Perhaps this is the real (underlying) issue that needs to be addresses aggressively via a public dialog/campaign. It can be compared to the Jewish vote that appears to think that all Christian's are the problem based on the back stabbing in Europe during the WWII era (and others).

    There is much experience, handlers, speech writers, scholars, think tanks, Senior Fellow's of institutions of learning, and I'm not seeing that all these resources have equipped our elected official (or anyone else) to develop an intelligent dialog about these problems. The black folk are still heard saying that the conservatives are not reaching out or are not listening. If one thinks they are reaching out and listening, but still being told they're not, this can be frustrating.  Frustration doesn't get you anywhere though. It would seem that with all these resources we would come up with a way to successfully be approaching this. Very insignificant in this.  

    That there (still) isn't a sustained dialog going on to address these concerns and problems strikes me as acting out from fear.  Just as the above vote indicates an underlying fear so this lack of addressing this is an underlying fear.  Perhaps a fear of offending.  Hey, the offence has already happened and is "taken."  Nothing to change there.  Those issues must be fully acknowledged and embraced.  How can one ask someone to ask themselves if the thinking, fears, opinions, they have are current, effective, and apply?  Perhaps it starts with addressing the underlying perceptions, fears, and beliefs.  I can't believe this isn't being done, can't be done, successfully.

    So often I see avoidance of the issues and I assume it's due a great discomfort because some of the details are so ugly.  Like immigration.  A fear of offending.  This isn't helping and it doesn't alleviate the problem.  Agreeing with something that's in error in order to avoid offending is circular reasoning in these areas. So, here we are. Again. Still. Surely there's nothing wrong with looking at ourselves and recognizing there's a lot of untapped creativity out there.

    Part of the problem seems to be a lack of connecting the dots, on all sides.  Perhaps due the fear thing.  Conservatives don't where the "state" versus "smaller government" and "I thought you wanted to be free."  Free at last was provided by the Feds coming in and providing life saving measures and access.  Larger government would appear to be better then allowing some states to have their way.

    Perhaps a change of focus.  Asking why we should wait on a Federal Government that takes hundreds of years to come to our rescue might be helpful.  On the other hand, insisting that the states should retain more power is proven scary...power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    Shouldn't we focus on whom we can really rely and on whom the power should be retained?  Me and you...sort of like "we the people" and all that.  

    A message of "give power to the states" isn't appropriate when one is really trying to get power to the people.  Obviously, the disconnect, misunderstandings, fears...continue to obscure.

    I fail to understand, with all the resources and great minds, this isn't being applied and addressed...successfully.  

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search