Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Why I Opposed the Massive, $700 Billion Taxpayer Financed Bailout


    By TimWalberg, Section News
    Posted on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 05:29:44 PM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    Through the thousands of calls, emails and letters sent to my office over the last week, I know that my constituents want Congress to take action to avert further economic distress. But south-central Michigan believes Congress must not take action just to take action. As many of you know, the House voted twice, first on Monday and then later on Friday, on legislation to bailout Wall Street. I opposed the massive, $700 billion taxpayer financed bailout both times, though it passed the second time around.

    From the outset, I had deep reservations about this legislation. President Bush, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and a frenzied media climate eliminated the possibility of further debate to work on a deal that would protect taxpayers. Instead, Secretary Paulson refused alternative plans, demanded unprecedented power for the Treasury Department and asked the American people for a blank check to cover speculative investments and mistakes made by investment bankers. President Bush refused to consider other options and thrust this legislation on the American people in a way that only created more uncertainty.

    Our financial markets face serious challenges that could result in dire consequences, but this is exactly the time when cooler heads need to prevail and real debate needs to occur. Instead, a rushed piece of legislation was brought before the House for a vote. Though House Republicans were able to improve Secretary Paulson's initial proposal, the final bill was nothing more than an expensive, taxpayer-funded band aid that will not solve our long-term economic problems.

    After a couple days of deliberations, the Senate then passed a revised version of the bill. The Senate version contained some positive changes, including a provision to provide greater FDIC protection to Americans and to America's hometown banks, but it also contained several unrelated spending items.

    As too often is the case in Washington, a 100 page bill at the beginning of the week turned into a 400 page bill by the week's end.  Special interest provisions were tacked on to the final bill, including millions of dollars for makers of wooden arrows, the Puerto Rican and Virgin Islands rum industry, wool fabric producers and Hollywood movie makers. These spending items have no place in an economic rescue bill, do nothing to address America's financial crisis and fail to provide the fundamental reform our economy desperately needs.

    In spite of this wasteful spending, the House passed the revised bill and the President signed it into law. Taxpayers are now on the hook for $700 billion. Our Treasury Secretary now has extraordinary power over this massive amount of money with few guidelines and, at best, limited oversight.

    The vast majority of my constituents are working hard, paying their bills and making ends meet for their families, and they believe real alternatives exist to running up the bill the government sends to taxpayers. One move I previously suggested was addressed this week by the SEC, which announced plans to reform mark-to-market accounting to reflect true value. I also suggested approving net worth certificates and reducing tax and regulatory barriers that currently prevent new capital from entering our markets. Congress needs to lower the capital gains and corporate tax rates to enable American companies to compete, innovate, grow and expand.

    Additionally, Congress must demand increase transparency and accountability on Wall Street. Since our government will now be buying up all of these toxic assets, I would like to see audit reports of failed companies to ensure that the financial standing of these troubled companies was accurately portrayed.

    Finally, Congress must realize that it is in many ways the most responsible for our current situation. Bad policies and poor oversight from Congress led to an artificial housing bubble that eventually had to burst. Congress should not make these mistakes again.

    < Live from GVSU! Dan Tietema debates Robert Dean! | One more reason to love Gov. Palin >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Love ya, Tim; but this ain't leadership (none / 0) (#2)
    by Angry White Male on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 10:21:40 PM EST
    "Rep. Paul Ryan said he also realized this was a 'Herbert Hoover moment, where he sat by and let a Wall Street crash turn into a Great Depression . . . There are times when free-markets stop and rational thinking goes out the window. It then isn't enough to be a laissez-faire conservative and let Rome burn . . .'

    "His colleagues (who unlike him opposed attempts to reform Fannie and also voted against the bailout) are spinning their votes as bravery, crowing that it was they who listened to constituents and they who acted on free-market principles. Never mind that these principles were nowhere in evidence back when it mattered. And never mind that should America crash, it will be the free market offered up as sacrifice to the regulatory mob."

    from WSJ, "What Leadership Looks Like," http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122299041527400421.html


    What the hell? (none / 0) (#3)
    by jgillmanjr on Fri Oct 03, 2008 at 11:14:39 PM EST
    You opposed the bailout both times, yet you voted yes on this latest iteration?

    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over?

    Whew.... (none / 0) (#5)
    by Rougman on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 08:13:51 AM EST
    Thank God the wooden arrow industry is safe.  

    The WSJ is wrong, Walberg lead. Ryan caved (none / 0) (#6)
    by Republican Michigander on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 10:04:48 AM EST
    I like Paul Ryan, but he didn't leave. He caved to the fatcats who wanted a bailout.

    Real leadership isn't Paulson's bailout. Real leadership is fixing the root causes of this mess so it does not happen again. This happened because of a glut of debt, increased energy costs and food prices, subprime mortgages, Fannie and Freddy, etc. That was not addressed by this.

    This Bill Is (none / 0) (#7)
    by MarkMuylaert on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 10:10:31 AM EST
    an abomination, loaded with pork.  I guess you CAN buy votes in congress as long as it is with other people's, (i.e. taxpayers,) money.

    I'm sick and tired of congress patting themselves on the back whenever they spend more tax dollars.  IT ain't your goddamn money.  

    Republicans had a great opportunity to tell the American people that they would stand firm and cut the size of government so as not to pass this huge deficit onto the people, but as usual, they went along to get along.  And then you mental midgets wonder why you're losing elections.

    VIVE LIBERTE'
    Vote libertarian!

    Woulda, shoulda, coulda (none / 0) (#8)
    by Ed Burley on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 12:23:27 PM EST
    Had McCain really wanted to win, show the world that he's a true maverick, and that he gives a rat's ass about the taxpayer; he would have voted 'no' on this bill (getting all the Repubs to go along), and then explained to the American people why he voted no.

    If McCain would have just explained to people what good economic policy is, and how he would implement it, he would be leading Obama right now. Instead, he makes these anti-Obama ads, and then votes identical to Obama.

    Had he voted against the bill, he could have pointed out to the world that OBAMA VOTED WITH BUSH ON THE BAILOUT, and he didn't. OMG, how simple can it get?

    Too simple for these simpletons, eh?

    Everyone (none / 0) (#10)
    by maidintheus on Sat Oct 04, 2008 at 10:07:07 PM EST
    needs to stop for a sec and rethink this.

    In light of the fact that McCain has made a stand for certain things that were extremely unpopular, we can assume that he would, does and will again.

    Let's remember who was willing to throw lives and national interests aside for partisan purposes all these years.

    I can see how things have been manipulated so that McCain gets little credit and dirt thrown in his face.

    I'm just suggesting a slow, long, look at all the facts, angles, reasons, in light of what we know of past performance.  Also, a calm and further study of the purpose of the Bill in question and a future commitment to keep pressure on our public servants to do the necessary follow up required.

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    Related Links

    + Also by TimWalberg
    create account | faq | search