Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Media double-standard: Detroit Free Press proposes revenue cuts without specific replacement


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 09:13:49 AM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    On the op-ed page of the Detroit Free Press today, the editors are calling for the state to ban smoking in public places.  Of course, Governor Granholm has taken great pains to raise the tax on cigarettes again and again and the state is currently stepping up enforcement at the Indiana and Ohio borders to stop residents from crossing state lines to buy cheaper smokes.

    Some have argued that she's balanced the budget on the backs of smokers.  And she's trying to push another smoke tax hike through this budget cycle.  Still, the Free Press demands that the state eliminate smoking in public places, thus decreasing the demand for cigarettes and taking a big bite out of the state coffers.

    My mind immediately returns to the summer of 2006 and the FREEP's demand that gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos propose a replacement for the "lost revenue" that would result from an elimination of the hated Single Business Tax.

    They were quite insistent.

    I thought I'd take this opportunity to call on the Detroit Free Press to propose a replacement for the lost revenue resulting from an elimination of smoking in public places.  

    And as DeVos' accurate assertion that much of the lost SBT revenue would be made up through the resulting economic growth was rejected as lacking specifics, so too must I reject the likely argument that the state might save on health-care costs should smoking decrease.  

    It's time the Detroit Free Press put it's money where it's mouth is.  Residents who depend on essential state services have a right to know specifically how they would replace this lost revenue.

    < Now it's personal | Granholm fails again: New auto plants...in Mississippi? 2,400 Michigan workers remain unemployed >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    No Need To Replace Revenue (1.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Mark J Muylaert on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:26:20 PM EST
    Nick, I don't think Michigan will lose any revenue from banning cigarettes in public places, afterall people are still allowed to smoke in their homes, at least for now.  I would agree with your comments if the Freep had called for a total ban on cigarettes for the state.

    Being the Libertarian I am, I feel the state has overstepped their authority by trying to ban smoking in Bars and Rests.  These are privately owned businesses and should not be told how to run their business.  

    I am sick and tired of the state usurping the rights of citizens, but we only have ourselves to blame because we have failed to keep tighter reins on our elected officials.  Until we educate more people to the fact that it is "We The People," who hold the power we will get this kind of legislation.

    don't disagree with you... (none / 0) (#2)
    by Nick on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 01:51:45 PM EST
    The article was written with a twinge of sarcasm.

    To the FREEP absolutely everything has a revenue component.  In fact it's their assertion in the column that by passing such a ban it would in fact lead to people smoking less (and, obviously, being exposed less to second hand smoke).  

    They view the proposal as a way to modify behavior, hence, my approach.

    You're right on about everything you said!

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!

    Related Links

    + Detroit Free Press
    + Also by Nick
    create account | faq | search