NAVIGATION
|
NEWS TIPS!RightMichigan.com
Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"
|
Grassroots Pro-Lifers Must Strongly Oppose the Expansion of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in MIBy Andrew Shirvell, Section News
This month, the Michigan Catholic Conference (MCC) and Right to Life of Michigan (RTL of MI) have begun a massive state-wide informational campaign in order to educate their respective supporters concerning their moral opposition to the expansion of embryonic stem cell research in Michigan.
The in-house educational campaign is seen as a precursor to what will take place in the larger public arena if and when, as expected, a pro-embryonic stem cell research petition initiative develops in the coming months and places the issue squarely before Michigan voters in November 2008. The MCC and RTL of MI are correct to start with educating and motivating their own membership on this crucial moral issue, which has many political implications. The truth is that many pro-life politicos have been far from faithful in opposing the destruction of human embryos for research purposes. Moreover, misleading polling questions give the impression that there is a huge amount of public support for embryonic research/experimentation (unlike for abortion on demand, for instance, since polling shows that a majority of Americans consistently remain "uncomfortable" about that issue). This deceptive impression of citizen support for embryonic stem cell research in turn leads otherwise pro-life politicians to support such research, or, more often, to sit on the sidelines of the debate. Hence, a vicious circle ensues, which inherently benefits proponents of embryonic stem cell research.
RTL of MI and the MCC's educational campaign on embryonic (versus adult) stem cell research is a good start in attempting to unify grassroots pro-lifers within the state on this crucial issue. Unifying and motivating Michigan pro-lifers will electrify the core base of the Michigan Republican Party, and the Michigan conservative movement in general, since the base of each of those two entities is strongly pro-life. This electrification of the base will in turn spur Michigan pro-life politicians to jump in on the right side of the debate over expanding embryonic stem cell research when such a discussion really gets going in the summer and fall of 2008, if indeed a pro-embryonic stem cell research ballot question is placed before Michigan voters.
Yet, there is one major problem that the stem cell debate inherently causes for those trying to rally the troops against embryonic stem cell research, which is that it tends to be much, much less of an emotionally-charged issue for people, and pro-lifers in particular, than say abortion or saving Terri Schiavo, for example. As a true believing pro-lifer, I know in my heart that opposing embryonic stem cell research is just as important as opposing the daily slaughter that takes place in the abortion mills, since tiny, microscopic embryos in a Petri dish are just as much human beings as those unborn children with heartbeats and brain activity who are further developed and live in their mothers' wombs. But it is true that, if given a choice, I will probably spend a greater amount of my time advocating against abortion than against embryonic stem cell research. I suspect that many of my fellow Michigan pro-lifers would agree with me. Nevertheless, I think the leadership of RTL of MI and the MCC can motivate the pro-life grassroots to get as passionate about protecting human embryonic life (in a Petri dish) as we have been concerning unborn life in the womb. In fact, a recent RTL of MI mailing piece from long-time president Barbara Listing identifies who the opposition is and likens it to the arch-enemy of abortion opponents: "Universities, various members of the academia, hospitals, health care systems, independent laboratories, researchers of all stripes, and politicians representing both major political parties have formed an unholy alliance hellbent on destroying innocent human life all in the name of research." . . . "This debate is nothing new. It is as old as time itself. It's all about lies and deception in pursuit of the almighty dollar! Come to think of it. . .those are the identical motives behind the abortion industry. Now, isn't that a coincidence?" It sure isn't. And neither is it a coincidence that RTL of MI's strategy in mobilizing its supporters against the expansion of embryonic stem cell research is, in part, to compare this relatively new fight to the long-time struggle to end the abortion holocaust. Well, I think this strategy can work. I know that hearing about the evil of embryonic stem cell research at Mass this past Sunday - Respect Life Sunday - as well as reading about it in the parish bulletin and receiving several informational pieces in the mail over the past few days has me more motivated to fight the potential expansion of embryonic stem cell research here in Michigan. This week's column is your evidence for that last assertion. P.S. To find out more about adult versus embryonic stem cell research, including what the current Michigan laws are concerning both forms of research, please see: http://www.stemcellresearchcures.com About the author: Andrew Shirvell, Esq., is a pro-life citizen activist who writes a weekly column that is published every Thursday for RightMichigan.com in which he focuses upon Michigan pro-life issues. Shirvell attended Ave Maria School of Law - Ann Arbor, where he served as president of the school's Bioethics Society, from 2004-2005. He also served as president of Students for Life at the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor, from 2000-2002.
Grassroots Pro-Lifers Must Strongly Oppose the Expansion of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in MI | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)
Grassroots Pro-Lifers Must Strongly Oppose the Expansion of Embryonic Stem Cell Research in MI | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)
|