RightMichigan.com || Comments || And So It Begins

Advertise on RightMichigan.com

RightMichigan.com

Buzz

Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?
Tweets about "#RightMi, -YoungLibertyMI, -dennislennox,"

Raise the curtain.

And So It Begins | 37 comments (37 topical, 0 hidden)

Poor argument (none / 0) (#23)
by Nathan Inks on Wed Jul 03, 2013 at 11:52:21 AM EST

Just because Congress doesn't say it's a tax doesn't mean it's not a tax.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

If they started calling it an "income penalty" and had that collected by the IRS, that wouldn't change the fact that it's still an income tax.

I have read the Constitution (many times), and did quite well in Constitutional Law, and government in high school. ;)

There is no violation of the Tenth Amendment here, because the power to tax was delegated to the United States.

Parent

The bill originated in the Senate by JGillman, 07/03/2013 12:16:44 PM EST (none / 0)

And before you embarrass yourself any further by JGillman, 07/03/2013 12:20:53 PM EST (none / 0)

Are talking about the shell by JGillman, 07/03/2013 12:37:37 PM EST (none / 0)

Show me the case where SCOTUS agrees with you by Nathan Inks, 07/03/2013 12:38:53 PM EST (none / 0)

I could care less what SCROTUS says. by JGillman, 07/03/2013 12:49:31 PM EST (none / 0)

Where does the Constitution reference shell bills? by Nathan Inks, 07/03/2013 01:01:28 PM EST (none / 0)

What does sticking with sporks have to do with it? by Nathan Inks, 07/04/2013 06:08:35 AM EST (none / 0)

And is ist circumventing the Constitution by Nathan Inks, 07/03/2013 01:10:39 PM EST (none / 0)

*is it by Nathan Inks, 07/03/2013 01:10:54 PM EST (none / 0)
I guess your lack of reply by Nathan Inks, 07/07/2013 01:56:06 AM EST (none / 0)

It did not originate in the Senate by Nathan Inks, 07/03/2013 12:23:35 PM EST (none / 0)

And So It Begins | 37 comments (37 topical, 0 hidden)

Tweet along with RightMichigan by following us on Twitter HERE!