"we as conservatives are supposed to want judges who will do the right thing, no matter how much that person disagrees with the politics of it!  That is what sets us apart from the left: we believe in the Rule of Law, which means that even if it leads to bad results for us, we want our judges to judge things as the text of the Constitution or statute or contract or whatever requires. "

We can frame our analysis around our desired outcomes, but the truth is the truth.

Last note:

"And for heaven's sake, please do not let the fact that a judge has, once, voted for a case where you may disagree with the outcome sour you on a person's entire judicial philosophy or record. "

Still studying on these candidates.  The words 'liable' and 'responsible' being bridged did not sufficiently convince me that Markey is not rule of law in that case.