Yes, this is precisely the paragraph that Saul Anuzis and the others used to justify their ignoring the by-the-rules outcome of Tuesday's election.  (Not unlike the NPV would take advantage of a necessary constitutional loophole to ignore the state-by-state outcomes in favor of the nationwide popular vote total.)  But if this paragraph provides the committee the authority to do as it damn well pleases, then what's the purpose of having the rules (or the meeting in which the rules were agreed upon) in the first place?


Parent