I'm not against "labor" or even "big labor".  If "big labor" can survive in the marketplace - if it can survive by providing a fair value to the worker for the union due it extracts and workers willing continue to contribute - then I support it.  I oppose corrupt uses of that money, wasteful uses, involuntary uses, or uses that are not productive.  I'd guess that's what you meant as well, but just wanted to make my view on this issue clear and point to the importance of precision in our words on this issue.


Chetly Zarko
Outside Lansing & Oakland Politics