Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    Really? (none / 0) (#10)
    by jgillmanjr on Sat Dec 19, 2009 at 02:22:57 PM EST
    The counter to that is "Well, they can choose to go to another business"...  they can, but that choice itself is forced upon them.

    Do you really want to go there?

    Going on that logic, with the passage of this law, smokers who wish to smoke while enjoying a drink or food are forced to go to "underground" establishments (prohibition, speakeasies, what?). What say you?

    As for this:

    There is no philosophical or Constitutional reason a State can't choose to regulate time and place with smoking - where's the Constitutional prohibition.

    No philosophical reason? Are you kidding me? So then you would agree with the statement that there is no philosophical or constitutional reason the state couldn't ban smoking? Would you also agree with the statement that there is no philosophical or constitutional reason the state couldn't place arbitrary restrictions upon the use of private property?

    I suppose you agree with the Wickard v. Filburn decision?

    Parent

    • Give a break by chetly, 12/20/2009 09:04:12 PM EST (none / 0)
      • Um, no? by jgillmanjr, 12/20/2009 09:56:18 PM EST (none / 0)

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search