1. Fair enough.  But, now you have a TEA/Conservative (yes, with a capital 'C') movement that has been put through the wringer by a slimy Snydholm gov, shat upon by Third World voting Shostak whose heir apparent is already walking back on ObamneyCare, Thad McFraud, the Nancy Classless Star Chamber, Bolgergate, MB Kelly queefing a dimwitted goonion gimme Pandoras box, RNC convention rules FUBAR, and now you want those TEA/Conservative folks to aid you more?  Why?

2. But of course the Party players had a big push for Kelly/Young.  They paid for them, and are in the right to be p!ssed off at them for their bonerhead pandering to the goonions.  RPY/MBK should know best of the Golden Rule: he who has the gold makes the rules.  It is the Rule of Law.  Any decent bill by the hour ambulance chaser can find that buried in some archaic footnote they've created to entrench themselves as something that we all just can't possibly live without.

3. I just love your logic here: "Chalking O'Brien up as the "establishment approved" candidate rings a bit hollow now since she was chosen by a popular vote of the delegates."  Well, then I must then assert this: "Speaking with the Wiz on the floor afterward, we both agreed that many if not most of the voters probably do not know why they are voting in a particular way on these judicial races.  That most of the results do arrive from political means. (Wiz, please correct me if I read you wrong)"

For clarification, I'm going to ask you again: So, tell us, how much is a Justice war chest paying for the rewrites of history these days?