I have no problem looking for the possibility of corruption.  But Edwards threw Stamper in jail a year ago, long before Snyder appointed his son to the bench.  Edwards hasn't changed his stance on the MDOT/DIBC issue.  I think it's unfair to throw out the "Corruption!" flag when there's no evidence supporting the claim other than one coincidence, while there's a fair amount of evidence that Edwards is simply remaining consistent with his previous rulings on the issue.

Parent